EGU25-3840, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3840
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X5, X5.58
Effect of dispersion normalisation on PM10 elemental sources at a rural background site in Central Europe 
Petra Pokorná1, Laurence Windell1,2, Adéla Holubová Šmejkalová3, Ondřej Vlček3, Naděžda Zíková1, Radek Lhotka1, Jaroslav Schwarz1, Jakub Ondráček1, and Vladimír Ždímal1
Petra Pokorná et al.
  • 1Aerosol Chemistry and Physics Research Group, ICPF of the CAS, Prague, Czech Republic (pokornap@icpf.cas.cz)
  • 2PSI Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
  • 3Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

Rural background sites, representative of a wider area, are important for investigating the influence of regional and long-range transport as well as long-term trends in PM concentrations (Putaud et al., 2010). Dispersion normalisation using the ventilation coefficient has recently been shown to be an effective approach that provides improved source apportionment results with clearer diel and seasonal patterns for speciated PM datasets (Dai et al., 2020). The focus of this study was to assess the influence of dispersion conditions represented by ventilation coefficient on speciated PM10 concentrations and their origins at the National Atmospheric Observatory Košetice (NAOK, 49°35'N, 15°05'E), a rural background site in Central Europe (LRI ACTRIS ERIC, https://www.actris.eu/).

PM10 elemental composition was measured every 4-h for three years (2021 – 2023) by the Xact625i (Cooper Environmental Services, USA), an online ED-XRF ambient multi-metals monitor. Ventilation coefficient was calculated with 1-h resolution by the numerical weather prediction model ALADIN for subsequent dispersion normalisation of highly time-resolved and speciated PM10 data. Advanced receptor modelling (US EPA PMF 5.0) was applied to both non-dispersion and dispersion normalised highly time-resolved PM10 elemental datasets.

PMF resolved five factors of PM10 (secondary sulphate, residential heating – biomass and coal, soil/re-suspended dust, sea/road salt, industry) for both datasets with almost identical chemical profiles. The factor contributions were positively (lower contributions – secondary sulphate, residential heating, and salt) and negatively (higher contributions – soil/re-suspended dust and industry) influenced by dispersion conditions. Dispersion normalisation provided improved source apportionment results with clearer diel and seasonal patterns, primarily for secondary sulphate and residential heating, the main sources of elemental PM10.

This conference contribution was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under grant ACTRIS-CZ (LM2023030).

 

Putaud, J.P., et al., 2010. A European aerosol phenomenology — 3: physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe. Atmos. Environ. 44, 1308–1320.

Dai, Q. at al., 2020. Dispersion Normalized PMF Provides Insights into the Significant Changes in Source Contributions to PM2.5 after the COVID-19 Outbreak. Environ. Sci. Tech. 54, 16, 9917–9927.

How to cite: Pokorná, P., Windell, L., Holubová Šmejkalová, A., Vlček, O., Zíková, N., Lhotka, R., Schwarz, J., Ondráček, J., and Ždímal, V.: Effect of dispersion normalisation on PM10 elemental sources at a rural background site in Central Europe , EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-3840, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3840, 2025.