EGU25-4384, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-4384
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 16:15–16:25 (CEST)
 
Room N1
Developing land use strategies in Europe under climate change and legislative constraints
Konstantin Gregor1, Christopher P.O. Reyer2, Thomas A. Nagel3, Annikki Mäkelä4,5, Andreas Krause1, Thomas Knoke1, and Anja Rammig1
Konstantin Gregor et al.
  • 1Technische Universität München, Land Surface - Atmosphere Interactions, München, Germany (konstantin.gregor@tum.de)
  • 2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany
  • 3University of Ljubljana, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Biotechnical Faculty, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 4Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, Helsinki, Finland
  • 5Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research / Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Finland

Land use, land management, and land cover change (LULCC) play a pivotal role in shaping ecosystems, influencing global and local climate, biodiversity, and the provision of resources.
Therefore, effective land use strategies need to consider the trade-offs between these often competing objectives. 

Legislative frameworks, including the EU Biodiversity Strategy, EU Forest Strategy, and national policies, aim to protect natural landscapes, enhance ecosystem services, and leverage resources for climate mitigation and the bioeconomy. However, reconciling these objectives poses a critical challenge for policymakers, land managers, and conservation stakeholders.

Using process-based ecosystem modeling and robust multi-criteria optimization, we analyzed how portfolios of forest management strategies could sustain multiple ecosystem services across diverse climate scenarios. The study incorporated strict constraints, such as protecting 10% of Europe’s land area and maintaining stable harvest levels under all climate scenarios. Results revealed significant trade-offs: limited flexibility due to the constraints led to low-diversity portfolios that compromised multi-functionality and increased regional risks. Moreover, productive northern regions would need to prioritize timber provision to compensate for declining harvests elsewhere, conflicting with targets for increasing forest carbon sinks in those regions. The uneven distribution of protected areas also introduced disparities in conservation efforts.

Our findings underscore the need for coordinated European land use strategies that address these conflicts. Complementary measures to the EU strategies are essential to achieve goals for carbon sequestration, resource availability, and ecosystem services under a changing climate. While the analysis focused on forests, the approach can be adapted to other land use types.

How to cite: Gregor, K., Reyer, C. P. O., Nagel, T. A., Mäkelä, A., Krause, A., Knoke, T., and Rammig, A.: Developing land use strategies in Europe under climate change and legislative constraints, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-4384, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-4384, 2025.