EGU25-6589, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-6589
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 29 Apr, 14:20–14:30 (CEST)
 
Room F1
The perfect storm: loss potential of Eunice-like cyclones in a counterfactual climate
Nicholas Leach1,2, Shirin Ermis1,3, Aidan Brocklehurst4, Dhirendra Kumar5, Alexandros Georgiadis4, Lukas Braun4, and Len Shaffrey5
Nicholas Leach et al.
  • 1Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (nicholas.leach@physics.ox.ac.uk)
  • 2Climate X Ltd, 166 Borough High St, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (nicholas.leach@climate-x.com)
  • 3Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales
  • 4Aon Impact Forecasting, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales
  • 5Department of Meteorology and National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales
Storm Eunice was a severe windstorm that impacted Central Europe in February 2022, causing over €2.5 Bn in insured loss. It formed on a cold front west of the Azores before undergoing explosive cyclogenesis and tracking across Central Europe, producing recorded wind gusts of up to 55 ms-1. The contribution of climate change to the storm dynamics and severity was examined by Ermis et al., who found that in counterfactual weather forecasts - given an identical initial synoptic setup - climate change had measurably increased the severity of the storm. 
 
Here we move beyond their meteorological attribution and quantify the role of climate change in the losses incurred during Eunice. We combine the same counterfactual weather forecasts with two loss models, including one state-of-the-art catastrophe model, finding that the increases in meteorological severity do translate through to substantial increases in estimated loss. We compare the loss model results with a commonly used “loss index” finding that the index inadequately represents the heavy tail of the loss distribution, demonstrating the importance of using impact models for quantitative assessments of loss in a changing climate.
 
Of particular note is the existence of several “boosted” members within the forecast ensembles whose losses are far greater than what unfolded in reality. This includes one realisation, simulated in a warmer “future” climate, in which the total loss nearly reaches €50 Bn. The plausible existence of such a catastrophic loss is of considerable relevance to a wide variety of stakeholders across adaptation planning, and the financial sector. We suggest that our results demonstrate not only the potential utility of weather forecast models in quantifying impacts attributable to climate change, but also the value of academic - private partnerships in which the two sectors are able to bring different areas of expertise.

How to cite: Leach, N., Ermis, S., Brocklehurst, A., Kumar, D., Georgiadis, A., Braun, L., and Shaffrey, L.: The perfect storm: loss potential of Eunice-like cyclones in a counterfactual climate, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-6589, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-6589, 2025.