EGU25-7297, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7297
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.33
Key Atmospheric Processes in The Canadian Oil Sands Identified through Model Evaluation
Sepehr Fathi1, Paul Makar1, Colin Lee1, Alexandru Lupu1, Craig Stroud1, Stefan Miller1, Mahtab Majdzadeh1, Junhua Zhang1, Ali Katal1, Eric Edgerton2, Matt Landis3, Emily White4, Oumarou Nikiema5, Véronique Brousseau-Couture5, Ivana Popadic5, Helen Burgess5, Calin Zaganescu5, Andrea Darlington6, and Greg Wentworth7
Sepehr Fathi et al.
  • 1Modelling and Integration Research Section, Air Quality Research Division, Toronto, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada (sepehr.fathi@ec.gc.ca)
  • 2Atmospheric Research & Analysis, Inc.
  • 3Integrated Atmospheric Solutions, LLC
  • 4MAED Consulting
  • 5Air Quality Policy-Issue Response Section, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada
  • 6Processes Research Section, Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada
  • 7Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Alberta, Canada

We describe the current status of the ongoing model improvement and evaluation of the Oil Sands version of the Global Environmental Multiscale – Modelling Air-quality and CHemistry (GEM-MACH-OS) model.  GEM-MACH-OS was designed to provide 2.5km horizontal grid cell size model predictions for the chemical processing of gases and particulate matter emitted from industrial activities in the Canadian Oil Sands and other sources in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and neighboring regions.  Starting in 2022, a successive series of model updates and evaluations were carried out for the model simulation year October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018.  We report here on several of these simulations how the comprehensive dataset from different monitoring networks was used to improve GEM-MACH-OS predictions, and identify key processes for Oil Sands chemistry.  The monitoring networks included the Wood Buffalo Environmental Association (WBEA, which provided hourly air concentration data for NO2, SO2, PM2.5, O3, NO and CO, daily intermittent total and speciated PM2.5 and PM10, and passive monthly to bimonthly SO2, NO2, HNO3, NH3 and O3), the National Trends Network (NTN, providing weekly precipitation totals and ions in precipitation for SO42-, NO3-, NH4+, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+ and Cl-), the National Air Pollution Surveillance program (NAPS, providing continuous hourly samples of NO2, SO2, PM2.5, O3, NO and CO, as well as daily intermittent samples of HNO3, SO2 speciated PM2.5, speciated total PM at CAPMoN stations), and the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network (CAPMoN, providing daily intermittent samples of precipitation and ions in precipitation for the same species as NTN).

Examples of evaluation over 5 consecutive model versions will be shown, demonstrating both the improvement in model performance over time, and identifying chemical species for which further improvement is desired.  The evaluation also identified key processes governing chemical transformation in the region.  These included: (1) O3:  relatively little photochemical production from local emissions takes place, but down-mixing from the upper atmosphere creates a substantial seasonal signal; (2) SO2:  mostly emitted from large stacks, with the plume heights depending on a parameterization including latent heat release from combustion water (Fathi et al., 2024), and co-deposition potentially has a significant influence on SO2 deposition; (3) NO2:  a key reaction governing concentrations in the region is the reaction of NO2 on particle surfaces to form HONO and HNO3; (4) Forest fires in the region emit much lower levels of SO2 and NOx than standard inventory emission factors would suggest, and have a different particle speciation; (5) Particulate matter from Oil Sands fugitive dust sources is influenced both by vehicle-induced turbulence and meteorological modulation (with coarse mode emissions dropping off as temperatures drop below a fixed temperature when the ground is frozen, during rainfall and snowfall events, and as the surface soil water increases).  Planned next steps in model improvement will also be discussed.

How to cite: Fathi, S., Makar, P., Lee, C., Lupu, A., Stroud, C., Miller, S., Majdzadeh, M., Zhang, J., Katal, A., Edgerton, E., Landis, M., White, E., Nikiema, O., Brousseau-Couture, V., Popadic, I., Burgess, H., Zaganescu, C., Darlington, A., and Wentworth, G.: Key Atmospheric Processes in The Canadian Oil Sands Identified through Model Evaluation, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-7297, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7297, 2025.