EGU25-7821, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7821
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Monday, 28 Apr, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Monday, 28 Apr, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.17
 Cloud microphysics in Arctic and Antarctic environments derived from infrared emission spectroscopy
Joseph Hung1, Penny Rowe2, Emily McCullough3, Liam Kroll3, Raia Ottenheimer1, Rachel Chang3, and Kimberly Strong1
Joseph Hung et al.
  • 1University of Toronto, Department of Physics, Canada
  • 2NorthWest Research Associates, USA
  • 3Dalhousie University, Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Canada

Climate models struggle to accurately represent polar regions, particularly during polar night, when cloud cover is especially prevalent. The uncertainty budget is dominated by cloud and cloud-aerosol interactions, but the difficulty in maintaining robust field observations means a lack of long-term validation datasets for key cloud parameters. Long-term measurements of the downwelling thermal infrared (400 - 3000 cm-1) have been recorded since 2008 with an Atmosphere Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI) at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) in Eureka, Nunavut, Canada (80°N, 86°W) and operated by the Canadian Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Change (CANDAC), while a similar instrument was deployed at McMurdo Station for 2016 as part of the ARM [Atmosphere Radiation Measurement] West Antarctic Radiation Experiment (AWARE) program. We analyse the downwelling infrared emission of the polar atmosphere recorded by these AERI instruments, with supplementary data from observations and models, to derive a climatology of microphysical and optical properties of clouds at Eureka (since 2008) and McMurdo (2016), including optical depth, thermodynamic phase, and liquid droplet and ice crystal effective scattering radii. A comparison of these Arctic and Antarctic cloud properties reveals an abundance of cloud morphological states at these two polar locations. This presentation will also describe the temperature dependence of cloud microphysics, seasonality in the timeseries, and the effect of inversions on cloud boundaries, as well as challenges in performing these retrievals.

How to cite: Hung, J., Rowe, P., McCullough, E., Kroll, L., Ottenheimer, R., Chang, R., and Strong, K.:  Cloud microphysics in Arctic and Antarctic environments derived from infrared emission spectroscopy, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-7821, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7821, 2025.