EGU25-9194, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9194
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Monday, 28 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Monday, 28 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall A, A.106
Reanalysis of published eDNA for Hydrologic Process Understanding 
Rosetta Blackman1,2, Ueli Ammann3, and Natalie Ceperley3
Rosetta Blackman et al.
  • 1University of Zurich, Dept. Evolutionary Biology & Environment, Switzerland (rosetta.blackman@eawag.ch)
  • 2Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Institute of Geography & Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Environmental DNA (eDNA) consists of genetic fragments suspended in the water column. Recently, it has been heralded as an effective tool for biodiversity monitoring (Blackman et al., 2024), resulting in a considerable diversity of studies and data collection. Most of the data from these studies are published in open access repositories (e.g., ENA, eDNAexplorer, Genbank) but have minimal or no re-analysis, therefore offering a currently up-to-date resource. Recently, eDNA observations have been explored as a tool for understanding hydrological processes (Good et al., 2018; Mächler et al., 2021; URycki et al., 2024). Here, we explore published eDNA datasets that contain hydrologic data or are relevant for hydrology.

We have compiled published eDNA datasets that might also inform hydrologic process knowledge or be otherwise relevant for hydrology.  For the moment, this is a metanalysis of those datasets and their publications, but as this work continues, we are exploring genetic and hydrologic data mining to repurpose this data for something other than its original intended objectives.  In this presentation, we give an overview of our proposed workflow for hydrological reanalysis of published genetic data and define a baseline for large-scale reanalysis and future projects that want to satisfy both objectives (i.e. understand biology and hydrologic processes).  

References

Blackman, R., Couton, M., Keck, F., Kirschner, D., Carraro, L., Cereghetti, E., Perrelet, K., Bossart, R., Brantschen, J., Zhang, Y., & Altermatt, F. (2024). Environmental DNA: The next chapter. Molecular Ecology, e17355. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17355

Good, S. P., URycki, D. R., & Crump, B. C. (2018). Predicting Hydrologic Function With Aquatic Gene Fragments. Water Resources Research, 54(3), 2424–2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr021974

Mächler, E., Salyani, A., Walser, J.-C., Larsen, A., Schaefli, B., Altermatt, F., & Ceperley, N. (2021). Environmental DNA simultaneously informs hydrological and biodiversity characterization of an Alpine catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(2), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-735-2021

URycki, D. R., Good, S. P., Crump, B. C., Ceperley, N. C., & Brooks, J. R. (2024). Microbial community storm dynamics signal sources of “old” stream water. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0306896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306896

How to cite: Blackman, R., Ammann, U., and Ceperley, N.: Reanalysis of published eDNA for Hydrologic Process Understanding , EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9194, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9194, 2025.