EGU25-9318, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9318
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 29 Apr, 11:50–12:00 (CEST)
 
Room -2.20
Meta-analysis on soil organic carbon and cereal production in organic farming systems across Europe
Elena Valkama1,2, Julia Fohrafellner3,4, Rajasekaran Murugan4, Klaus Jarosch5, Lena Weiss5, Peter Maenhout6, Claudia Di Bene7, Valentina Baratella7, Mariangela Diacono7, Rosanna Epifani7, Annamaria Bevivino8, Milena Stefanova8, Luciana Di Gregorio8, Ernesto Rossini8, Manuela Costanzo8, Gabriele Buttafuoco9, Romina Lorenzetti10, Gianluca Carboni11, and Valentina Mereu11,12
Elena Valkama et al.
  • 1Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Bioeconomy and environment, Turku, Finland (elena.valkama@luke.fi)
  • 2The Finnish Organic Research Institute (FORI), Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria
  • 4BOKU University, Institute of Soil Research, Vienna, Austria
  • 5Agroscope, Agroecology and Environment Zürich, Switzerland
  • 6Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium
  • 7CREA - Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Rome, Italy
  • 8Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Rome, Italy
  • 9National Research Council of Italy (CNR) Institute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, Rende, Italy
  • 10National Research Council of Italy (CNR) Institute for BioEconomy, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy
  • 11Agris Sardegna - Regional Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Cagliari
  • 12CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Italy

Organic farming may improve agroecosystems’ resilience against external stressors, favour below-ground biodiversity, soil health, and increase soil water holding capacity. At the same time, organic farming systems are repeatedly reported to have lower average crop yields than conventional systems. To date, global meta-analyses on organic farming systems include a diverse range of crops, but none of them specifically focus on arable systems with cereal-based rotations. Further, they are not representative for specific European agro-environmental zones and often show weaknesses in the applied meta-analytical methodology.

This meta-analysis aimed at quantitatively summarizing existing knowledge and outcomes on soil organic carbon (SOC) in the topsoil (0-20/30 cm) and cereal production (i.e., yields and yield stability) in organic farming systems compared to conventional farming systems across Europe.

The database consisted of 43 independent field studies on SOC and 50 field studies on cereal yields across 16 European countries, covering nine European agro-environmental zones. Cereal-based rotations were cultivated organically and conventionally on mineral soils, up to several decades. Yields for winter rye, winter and spring wheat, spring barley and spring oats were annually measured. SOC was measured as stock or concentration at the end of the experiments. Organic farming systems relied either on animal-based or plant-based fertilizers, or on both sources of nitrogen input. Conventional systems received solely mineral fertilization in most experiments. For both farming systems conventional tillage was applied without irrigation. The meta-analysis was conducted by using Meta Win 2.0 and IBM SPSS Statistics 29. As an index of effect size, we used ln (R), i.e., relative SOC, yield or temporal yield variation.  All studies were weighted by inverse variance.

The overall effect of organic farming was a 5% increase of topsoil SOC (95% CI: 1% – 9%, n=43) compared to conventional systems. Pedoclimatic factors, such as mean annual precipitation and clay content had a profound impact on SOC response under organic farming (p=0.014). With increasing annual precipitation and clay content, SOC response to organic farming was increasing, and reached 20% in areas with clayey soils and annual precipitation of 700 mm. In addition, the response of SOC to organic farming showed some positive trend with increasing soil pH (p=0.059).

Overall, cereal yield in organic farming was about 30% lower compared to conventional farming systems. However, yield performance of organic systems varied statistically significantly across farming types (p=0.021): a 20% yield gap was observed in organic systems using animal-based fertilizers, while a 35% yield gap was shown in organic systems using only legumes or mixed green manure. Moreover, the yield gap decreased with increasing average annual temperature (p=0.002). Overall, the temporal yield variation of organic farming systems was about 50% larger than in conventional systems, which was not related to any pedoclimatic factors studied.

In conclusion, organic farming systems had a positive impact on SOC in the topsoil, compared to conventional systems. The magnitude of this influence mainly depended on pedoclimatic characteristics in Europe. In terms of cereal production, organic farming had lower yields and yield stability compared to conventional farming.

How to cite: Valkama, E., Fohrafellner, J., Murugan, R., Jarosch, K., Weiss, L., Maenhout, P., Di Bene, C., Baratella, V., Diacono, M., Epifani, R., Bevivino, A., Stefanova, M., Di Gregorio, L., Rossini, E., Costanzo, M., Buttafuoco, G., Lorenzetti, R., Carboni, G., and Mereu, V.: Meta-analysis on soil organic carbon and cereal production in organic farming systems across Europe, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9318, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9318, 2025.