EGU25-9397, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9397
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 09:20–09:30 (CEST)
 
Room F2
Aerosol processes and activation in OpenIFS cycle 48r1 portable global aerosol-climate and weather prediction model
Eemeli Holopainen1 and Athanasios Nenes1,2
Eemeli Holopainen and Athanasios Nenes
  • 1Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas - Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Center for the Study of Air Quality and Climate Change, Patra, Greece (holopainen.tatueemeli@epfl.ch)
  • 2Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts (LAPI), School of Architecture, Civil & Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Aerosol-cloud interactions are complex processes that contribute significantly to uncertainties in predicting global climate. Cloud droplet formation is influenced by factors such as the hygroscopicity of soluble aerosol particles, aerosol processing within clouds, aerosol particle number concentration, and updraft velocity. Accurately understanding these factors is crucial for better representing cloud droplet numbers on a global scale. Updraft velocity is characterized by the probability density function (PDF) of the vertical velocity distribution. Earth system models (ESMs) typically assume a constant standard deviation (σw) for the vertical velocity PDF (van Noije et al. 2021; Mulcahy et al. 2020). However, this assumption may be inaccurate, as it has been shown that the σw exhibits significant diurnal variability (Bougiatioti et al. 2020). In this study, we implemented the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) calculations to OpenIFS cycle 48r1 (OIFS48r1) following Bastak Duran et al. (2018). In addition, we implemented Morales and Nenes (2014) activation parameterization (M&N) to OIFS48r1 including the TKE to calculate the σw instead of using a constant σw for the vertical velocity PDF. OIFS48r1 is derived from the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) developed by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and it will be the main atmospheric model used in the newest version of European Community ESM (EC-Earth 4). First, we investigated the effects of using constant σw values of 0 and 0.8 m/s on the TKE-derived σw and their impact on column averaged cloud droplet number concentrations. The results showed that using σw of 0 m/s led to very low droplet numbers, as weaker updraft variability resulted in smaller supersaturations, causing fewer particles to activate. On the other hand, using σw of 0.8 m/s produced stronger activation, particularly in regions with high aerosol particle number concentrations. When using the TKE-derived σw, the differences in droplet numbers compared to the activation scheme with σw of 0.8 m/s were minimal. Next, we compared the monthly column-averaged and boundary-layer (BL) average number of activated particles obtained from the TKE-derived σw activation routine with the pre-existing Abdul-Razzak and Ghan (2000) activation parameterization (AR&G). The results showed that the AR&G scheme produced stronger activation than the M&N scheme, both in terms of the total column average and the BL-averaged regions. One of the reasons for this difference could be due to the activation calculations in the M&N scheme, which are only performed in areas where clouds are present, while in the AR&G scheme, activation is calculated for every gridbox.

How to cite: Holopainen, E. and Nenes, A.: Aerosol processes and activation in OpenIFS cycle 48r1 portable global aerosol-climate and weather prediction model, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9397, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9397, 2025.