EGU25-9761, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9761
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X2, X2.25
Are all deep reflectors Moho? A case study of the Newfoundland margin
Laura Gómez de la Peña1, César Ranero1,2, Manel Prada1, Donna Shillington3, and Valentí Sallarès
Laura Gómez de la Peña et al.
  • 1Insitute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona-CSI, Barcelona, Spain (lgomez@icm.csic.es)
  • 2ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
  • 3Northern Arizona University School of Earth and Sustainability, Flagstaff (AZ), USA

The crustal structure of the Newfoundland-West Iberian conjugate margins has been extensively studied with seismic data and drilling legs. Recent surveys in the West Iberian margin have revealed a complex crustal architecture with continental, oceanic and exhumed mantle domains that change along the margin. In contrast, the Newfoundland margin, with lower seismic and drilling information available, remains comparatively more poorly understood. The main wide-angle and streamer SCREECH survey was acquired in 2000 and was modelled with comparative computational limitations at the time. The resulting images and model have been debated and did not unequivocally characterize the nature of the basement domains along the margin. Thus, the evolution of the deformation during rifting and the symmetry or asymmetry of the conjugate pair of margins are still discussed.

The SCREECH data acquisition parameters are similar to modern data, and we took advantage of their quality to re-process, image the structure and model the seismic phases with methodologies that have been refined during the last decade. Recent developments in parallel computing and novel geophysical approaches provide now the means to obtain a new look at the structure with enhanced resolution seismic models and a mathematically-robust analysis of the data uncertainty, that was formerly difficult, if not unfeasible, to achieve.

We use the SCREECH original field data, formed by three transects with coincident multichannel seismic (MCS) reflection data acquired with a 6-km streamer and wide-angle data recorded by short-period OBS and OBH spaced at ~15 km. We reprocessed the streamer data and also performed the joint inversion of streamer and wide-angle OBS/OBH seismic data, using reflections and refraction arrivals, which improved the definition of the geological units and the spatial resolution of the velocity model for each unit. We performed a statistical uncertainty analysis of the resulting model, supporting the improved reliability of the observed features.

Our results reveal previously unrecognized crustal heterogeneity, including variations in crustal thickness and composition along the margin. In particular, the crustal domain classification and the COT location were done considering the existence of a deep reflector, interpreted as the Moho and defining a 4-5 km crust that was interpreted as oceanic. Our results suggest that this reflector may not represent the Moho, as the observed crustal properties are not consistent with typical oceanic crust. The integration of the MCS images with the velocity models allowed us to re-interpret the crustal structure of this margin and integrate all the observations in a refined evolution model for the West Iberian – Newfoundland conjugate margins.

How to cite: Gómez de la Peña, L., Ranero, C., Prada, M., Shillington, D., and Sallarès, V.: Are all deep reflectors Moho? A case study of the Newfoundland margin, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9761, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9761, 2025.