- 1Natural Resources Institute Finland, Stable Isotope Laboratory of Luke (SILL), Helsinki, Finland (katja.rinne-garmston@luke.fi)
- 2Forest Soils and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
- 3College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China.
- 4Forest Dynamics, Dendrosciences, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
- 5Faculty of Science, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Physics, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- 6Department of Geography, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Temporal variability of tree-ring cellulose δ2H (δ2Hring-cel) can be a unique tool for understanding tree physiology and climate. However, we do not fully understand the drivers of temporal variability in δ2Hring-cel. Investigating seasonal δ2Hring-cel in boreal forests is particularly challenging. Previous studies on intra-annual tree-ring δ18Ohave shown that tree-ring isotope variability can result from the combined but opposing effects of source water and leaf assimilates, a dynamic likely relevant for δ2Hring-cel as well. To be able to use δ2Hring-cel as a standalone and reliable bioindicator, it is important to understand the variable hydrogen isotope fractionation between source water and tree rings. Our study aimed to provide context to this variability in a natural forest by being the first study to trace intra-annual δ2Hring-cel to the δ2H of its sources and drought indices.
The δ2H of source water, leaf water and carbohydrate pools (i.e. water-soluble carbohydrates, starch) were analysed from five pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees during 2019 at Hyytiälä forest, Finland. Their δ2H were used to model continuous δ2H of source water (δ2Hsource) and leaf sugars (δ2Hleaf-sug). Modelled and measured δ2Hleaf-sug matched moderately for 2019, and the model was applied to predict δ2Hleaf-sug during 2018. Intra-annual δ2Hring-cel were analysed in these two years at a resolution of 5-10 timepoints per year, and they were allocated to xylogenetic timepoints. They were then compared to time-integrated δ2Hsource, δ2Hleaf-sug, net assimilation rate, evapotranspiration and drought indicators.
Carbohydrate δ2H was significantly different among leaves, branches and stems. δ2Hring-cel had strong time-integrated relationships to modelled δ2Hsource, net leaf assimilation rate and evapotranspiration, but the direction of their relationships was different between years. At monthly resolution, water-soluble carbohydrate δ2H measured from one year-old needles had a strong, positive relationship to δ2Hring-cel. Similarly, the modelled δ2Hleaf-sug, had strong positive relationships to δ2Hring-cel, which were robust between years. δ2Hring-cel also had strong relationships to Standardized Soil Moisture Index (SSMI).
We show that the role of δ2Hleaf-sug superseded the role of δ2Hsource in intra-annual δ2Hring-cel, because δ2Hleaf-sug had a consistent relationship to intra-annual δ2Hring-cel in both years while δ2Hsource did not. This clearly supports the growing body of evidence that δ2Hring-cel is strongly mediated by physiological processes. Our results show promise for δ2Hring-cel functioning as a bioindicator of soil drought related physiological stress signals in long-term tree ring chronologies.
How to cite: Angove, C., Lehmann, M., Saurer, M., Tang, Y., Sahlstedt, E., Young, G., Treydte, K., Szejner, P., Leppä, K., Schiestl-Aalto, P., Wiesenberg, G., and Rinne-Garmston, K.: Intra-annual tree-ring cellulose δ2H as an indicator of drought, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9771, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9771, 2025.