EGU25-9815, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9815
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 01 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 01 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.163
Links to atmospheric circulation vary for individual heat wave types in Middle Europe
Jan Kysely1,2, Zuzana Poppova1, Jan Stryhal2, and Ondrej Lhotka2,3
Jan Kysely et al.
  • 1Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czechia (kysely@ufa.cas.cz)
  • 2Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 3Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic

We evaluate links to atmospheric circulation for three-dimensional heat wave types in Middle Europe over 1979–2022. Heat waves are classified according to their vertical structures of temperature anomalies in ERA5 into near-surface (HWG), lower-tropospheric (HWL), higher-tropospheric (HWH), and omnipresent (HWO) types. Jenkinson–Collison classification of daily mean sea level pressure patterns is used to identify circulation types (CTs) with increased frequency for the individual heat wave types. In all heat wave types, CTs with southerly flow are more common compared to the June–September climatology but differences are found for other groups of CTs. In HWG, the CT occurring most frequently is indeterminate flow, corresponding to a little pronounced pressure field with no clear role of anticyclonic vorticity or flow direction. The expected pattern of increased anticyclonic and decreased cyclonic flow is clearly manifest only for HWH, while it is reversed during HWG. The role of warm advection increases for the other two heat wave types, HWL and HWO. Anticyclonic circulation supporting gradual warming is important mainly before the onset of most heat wave types, except for HWH. The reported differences reflect diverse processes leading to the various heat wave types, with the dominant roles of anticyclonic vorticity for HWH and land–atmosphere coupling under little pronounced circulation patterns, following previous drying, for HWG.

How to cite: Kysely, J., Poppova, Z., Stryhal, J., and Lhotka, O.: Links to atmospheric circulation vary for individual heat wave types in Middle Europe, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9815, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9815, 2025.