EGU25-9988, updated on 30 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9988
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 02 May, 16:40–16:50 (CEST)
 
Room -2.20
Comparing thermogravimetric, TDR, ERT and EMI measurements of space and time evolution of water content along a transect during an infiltration experiment 
Antonio Coppola1, Andrea Vacca1, Gian Piero Deidda2, Shawkat Basel Mostafa Hassan3, Stefania Da Pelo1, Francesca Lobina1, Mostafa Saeed Mohamed Abdelmaqsoud1, Faiza Souid3, Riccardo Biddau1, Nicola Manis1, and Alessandro Comegna3
Antonio Coppola et al.
  • 1Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • 2Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • 3Department of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy (shawkat.hassan@unibas.it)

Monitoring and modelling of soil hydrological processes at large scales require measuring the spatial and temporal evolution of soil volumetric water contents, θv. Direct measurement of θv can be done by sampling and laboratory analyses. Although such methods are straightforward, they require a lot of time and effort for the collection of several samples to account for the spatial and temporal variability. Time-domain reflectometry, TDR, can be a good alternative as it is used to indirectly measure θv in the field by measuring the travel time of an electromagnetic pulse in a probe. However, it is an intrusive, point-scale method making it impractical at large scales and at subsurface measurements. Other geophysical methods, such as earth resistivity tomography, ERT, and electromagnetic induction, EMI, sensors represent a practical solution for their time efficiency and the ability to measure at large scales. In particular, compared to the ERT, which still requires the insertion of several electrodes at the soil surface and their connection with a cable network, the EMI has the further advantage (in terms of measurement rapidity) of not requiring insertion in soil to take measurements. Nevertheless, the toll to pay for this larger scale applicability, is that they do not directly measure θv and require complex electromagnetic inversion models to obtain either the electrical resistivity, ρb, or the bulk electrical conductivity, σb, spatial distributions over time respectively from the pseudo-sections coming from ERT and the series of apparent electrical conductivity, ECa, coming from EMI. In this sense, these methods require further efforts to correctly translate the ρb and the σb distributions in as many θv distributions. Accordingly, this study aims at comparing thermogravimetric, EMI and ERT systems to obtain the spatio-temporal evolution of θv at a transect scale. For this purpose, a series of measurement campaigns were carried out at a transect 24 m long and 1 m wide at a sprinkler-irrigated field in Arborea area in Sardinia, Italy. A large database of spatially, vertically and temporally distributed measurements was created from auger samples, undisturbed samples, Campbell TDR-200, ERT and CMD mini-explorer EMI sensor. TDR measurements were used to find a relationship between θv and σb. Inversion models were then used to obtain the σb distribution from ERT and EMI measurements, utilizing a previously determined characterization of the soil profile, e.g., layering, depth to groundwater table, texture, etc. The TDR-obtained θv - σb relationship was then utilized to estimate the θv distributions from EMI- and ERT-based σb distributions.

How to cite: Coppola, A., Vacca, A., Deidda, G. P., Hassan, S. B. M., Da Pelo, S., Lobina, F., Abdelmaqsoud, M. S. M., Souid, F., Biddau, R., Manis, N., and Comegna, A.: Comparing thermogravimetric, TDR, ERT and EMI measurements of space and time evolution of water content along a transect during an infiltration experiment , EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-9988, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9988, 2025.