Most of the global actions for sustainability focus on the biosphere, overlooking the role of abiotic components, embedded in and supported by the geosphere and its ecosystem services [1]. As a consequence, proxy for geodiversity evaluation can act as indicator of areas with a strong propensity for naturalness, enhancing their protection and promoting conservation strategies. Geodiversity assessment depends on the size of the study area, the nature and resolution of available data, and the choice of an empiric or a quantitative method to define a categorical geomorphodiversity index [2]. Geomorphodiversity, a simpler but meaningful quantity, describes the diversity of landforms in an area, resulting from the surface processes modelling the landscape.
We recently defined a geomorphodiversity index (GmI) considering a few morphological features derived from digital elevation models: slope angle, drainage density, and landforms (through the geomorphons model [3]), as an approximation to field-observed features, and lithological information, as descriptors of the geological constraints and geomorphological processes of the landscape. Compared to previous approaches [4-6], we introduced a scale–independent method that considers contributions of the partial diversities of the four descriptors, calculated through focal statistics with a range of radii. The partial maps were classed, combined, and classified again into a raster with five final GmI classes. We dropped the dependence from the window radius by combining the set of radius–dependent GmI maps into a single map, selecting for each cell the most common value across the set of maps [7]. This approach has the advantage or removing the parameter dependence and embedding information from different scales in each grid cell of the GmI, which makes it suitable for and suitable accuracy for national, regional and urban scale analysis [8].
We implemented the method in a simple and versatile GRASS GIS procedure, suitable for implementation in a general-purpose raster module. The software accepts a variable number of raster or vector layers, and for each layer it calculates partial diversities with the desired working resolution and a user-defined number of different radii for focal statistics. The software combines intermediate layers with different weights, defined by the user based on the available geomorphological information, and reclassified into a final geomorphodiversity index.
Results show that such GmI proxy can reproduce the essentials of the observed distribution of landforms, using a small number of widely available datasets. We consider the proposed GmI map as a discrete measure of richness and variability of abiotic components, providing an intuitive information, readily available for subsequent applications in different locations and at different resolutions.
References
[1] Schrodt et al., PNAS (2019). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911799116
[2] Zwoliński et al., Geoheritage (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00002-2
[3] Jasiewicz & Stepinski, Geomorphology (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.11.005
[4] Benito-Calvo et al., Earth Surf. Proc. Land. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1840
[5] Melelli et al., Sci. Tot. Env. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.101
[6] Burnelli et al., Earth Surf. Proc. Land. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5679
[7] Burnelli et al., Geomorphology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109532
[8] Burnelli et al., Geomorphology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109582