Remote sensing and model-based soil moisture datasets now provide global, frequent, and overall consistent surface soil moisture estimates. However, the complexity of hydrological processes involved in soil moisture evolution, especially over challenging environments may exceed the capabilities of these datasets.
Each type of soil moisture product has inherent limitations depending on their technique (e.g., coverage, interferences, signal-to-noise ratio, residual trends). However, there are soil moisture processes' characteristics, such as heterogeneity and transient states, that can affect each product differently depending on their capabilities across a range of spatial and temporal scales. Often, the performance of soil moisture products concerning these process-related factors is overlooked. Given the wide range of features (e.g., resolution, frequency, coverage) of current global soil moisture products, intercomparing them in complex soil moisture regimes can inform about their suitability for monitoring soil moisture in challenging environments of compromised resilience at regional and global scale.
This study evaluates several cutting-edge surface soil moisture products for effective monitoring, including (1) active remote sensing (from ASCAT and Sentinel-1 radar data), (2) passive remote sensing (ESA Climate Change Initiative passive dataset (CCIp) and NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission), and (3) model-based products (GLOFASv4 using the LISFLOOD model). The intercomparison is applied across regions with distinct challenging soil moisture regimes, such as Africa's monsoonal belts, Europe's convective storm corridors, and the Mediterranean basin. These areas, often less understood and instrumented, are characterized by regime transitions differing in spatial and temporal scale, and range and pace of soil moisture alteration, making them useful for testing soil moisture products beyond the ordinary range used to test their performance. The study period is 2016-2022, with a 5 x 5 km resolution and two temporal resolutions 10-day period and daily scale (considering the revisit times often span several days). Validation uses surface soil moisture data from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) across Europe and Africa.
Results indicate that hydrological monitoring focused on the long-term evolution of soil moisture (e.g., water resources assessment, drought, rainfed agriculture monitoring) is consistent across scales and environments for most products. However, monitoring soil moisture in areas with high spatial and temporal heterogeneity is more uncertain. Sentinel-1 data, with its high spatial resolution, excels in identifying patterns even at local scale but has limitations in temporal coverage, better addressed by products of short revisit times like ASCAT or model-based datasets less sensitive to time. CCIp, despite resolution constraints, effectively reproduces heterogeneity of the spatial patterns in the semi-arid areas of quick regime transitions, where active remote sensing and model-based estimates struggle. The more event-driven the process, the more uncertain the estimate of soil moisture evolution becomes, thus highlighting the need for higher temporal frequency over spatial resolution for near-real-time monitoring of impactful short-term events (e.g., floods, flash droughts). The study emphasizes the worth of evaluating products from the perspective of the target processes and encourages further research on their suitability to monitor soil moisture in unconventional conditions of regional and global relevance.