EGU26-17738, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17738
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall A, A.122
Nanoplastics in Loch Ness and surrounding rivers and channels
Dušan Materić1, Mike Peacock2, and Stuart Gibb3
Dušan Materić et al.
  • 1Department of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Germany, Leipzig, Germany (dusan.materic@ufz.de)
  • 2Department of Geography & Planning, University of Liverpool, UK
  • 3Environmental Research Institute, The University of the Highlands and Islands – North, West and Hebrides, UK

Nanoplastics (NPs) are an emerging class of pollutants that remain challenging to accurately quantify in environmental matrices. Increasing evidence suggests their potential for long-range atmospheric and aquatic transport, contributing to their global distribution [1,2]. Understanding NP occurrence in remote environments is therefore essential for identifying sources, transport pathways, and baseline background levels.

In this study, we analyzed water samples from Loch Ness and surrounding rivers and channels in the Scottish Highlands to assess the presence and composition of nanoplastics using Thermal Desorption – Proton Transfer Reaction – Mass Spectrometry (TD-PTR-MS) [3]. This represents one of the first reports of nanoplastics in UK inland waters.

The dominant polymer types detected were polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), and tire-wear particles (TWP). Nanoplastics were present even at depths exceeding 100 m in Loch Ness. Subsurface NP concentrations in lakes were influenced by the proximity of local sources, while among the rivers, the Ness River showed the highest levels near urban areas, with some tributaries exhibiting no detectable NPs.

Spatial patterns suggest a mix of local and long-range inputs. Elevated NP concentrations near populated and industrial areas point to local emissions, while consistent background levels of PET across remote sites indicate atmospheric or diffuse sources. These findings demonstrate  nanoplastics to be pervasive even in isolated freshwater systems, and underline the need for integrated monitoring approaches to better understand their transport and fate.

 

References

[1]        D. Materić, M. Peacock, J. Dean, M. Futter, T. Maximov, F. Moldan, T. Röckmann, R. Holzinger, Presence of nanoplastics in rural and remote surface waters, Environ. Res. Lett. 17 (2022) 054036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac68f7.

[2]        D. Allen, S. Allen, S. Abbasi, A. Baker, M. Bergmann, J. Brahney, T. Butler, R.A. Duce, S. Eckhardt, N. Evangeliou, T. Jickells, M. Kanakidou, P. Kershaw, P. Laj, J. Levermore, D. Li, P. Liss, K. Liu, N. Mahowald, P. Masque, D. Materić, A.G. Mayes, P. McGinnity, I. Osvath, K.A. Prather, J.M. Prospero, L.E. Revell, S.G. Sander, W.J. Shim, J. Slade, A. Stein, O. Tarasova, S. Wright, Microplastics and nanoplastics in the marine-atmosphere environment, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. (2022) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00292-x.

[3]        D. Materić, A. Kasper-Giebl, D. Kau, M. Anten, M. Greilinger, E. Ludewig, E. van Sebille, T. Röckmann, R. Holzinger, Micro- and Nanoplastics in Alpine Snow: A New Method for Chemical Identification and (Semi)Quantification in the Nanogram Range, Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 2353–2359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07540.

How to cite: Materić, D., Peacock, M., and Gibb, S.: Nanoplastics in Loch Ness and surrounding rivers and channels, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-17738, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17738, 2026.