EGU26-19190, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19190
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.80
Estimation of secondary organic aerosol from biomass burning using observations of formaldehyde, NO2 and AOD
Fiona Román de Miguel1,2, Betty Croft5, Maria Gonçalves7, Francesco Marangio7, Jeffrey Pierce8, Alexandra Tsimpidi3, Twan van Noije6, Ryan Vella4, and Nick Schutgens1,2
Fiona Román de Miguel et al.
  • 1Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Earth Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands (f.j.romandemiguel@vu.nl)
  • 2SRON, Space Research Organisation Netherlands, Leiden, Netherlands
  • 3Institute of Energy and Climate Research – Troposphere (IEK-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
  • 4Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 5Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
  • 6Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, Netherlands
  • 7Earth Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
  • 8Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA

Wildfires are a major source of atmospheric organic aerosol (OA), emitting primary organic aerosol (POA) and volatile organic compounds that oxidize to form secondary organic aerosol (SOA). This oxidation also produces formaldehyde (HCHO), which is additionally emitted directly from fires alongside nitrogen dioxide (NO₂). Both HCHO and NO2 are detectable from space, offering the potential to observationally constrain organic aerosol formation during biomass burning. However, this potential remains poorly quantified.

Here, we evaluate whether satellite observations of HCHO and NO₂ can be used to estimate POA and SOA from biomass burning events. We compare simulations from four models with satellite measurements from OMI (HCHO, NO₂) and POLDER (AOD). All models reproduce correctly the observed spatial patterns of HCHO, NO2 and AOD, but they overestimate trace gas concentrations and slightly underestimate AOD. Despite differences in magnitude, models and observations show linear relationships between HCHO and AOD.

Building on these observed relationships, we develop a satellite-based methodology to estimate POA and SOA with minimal use of model assumptions. The observed HCHO-AOD correlation is combined with satellite-derived mass extinction coefficient to relate observed AOD to organic aerosol. In addition, the relationship between NO2 and POA fraction, derived from in-situ measurements, is used to separate the two types of organic aerosols. Together, these relationships allow the estimation of POA and SOA from HCHO and NO2 observations, and sensitivity analysis shows that the method is robust. Application to the Amazon and African savanna indicates that observation-based POA formation is 3.82 and 5.53 times higher, respectively, than modeled values, while SOA formation is higher by factors of 2.4 and 3.5, suggesting model underestimation of organic aerosol production from biomass burning. 

How to cite: Román de Miguel, F., Croft, B., Gonçalves, M., Marangio, F., Pierce, J., Tsimpidi, A., van Noije, T., Vella, R., and Schutgens, N.: Estimation of secondary organic aerosol from biomass burning using observations of formaldehyde, NO2 and AOD, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-19190, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19190, 2026.