EGU26-5980, updated on 20 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5980
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.66
Comparison of the results of hydrocarbon oxidation experiments in an indoor and an outdoor atmospheric simulation chamber
Hendrik Fuchs1,2, Paul Wills3, Mixtli Campos-Pineda3, Shogo Saito3, Amir Ben Brik4, Claudiu Roman4, Satheesh Chandran3,5, John Wenger4, Anna Novelli1, Michelle Färber1, Yichen Gu1, Peeyhush Kharee1, Ralf Tillmann1, Dhanya Wilson1, Robert Wegener1, Max Gerrit Adam1, Birger Bohn1, and Albert A. Ruth3
Hendrik Fuchs et al.
  • 1Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, ICE-3 Troposphere, Jülich, Germany (h.fuchs@fz-juelich.de)
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • 3School of Physics and Sustainability Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • 4School of Chemistry and Sustainability Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • 5Centre for Advanced Photonics and Process Analysis, Munster Technological University, Cork, T12 P928, Ireland

Experiments in atmospheric simulation chambers enable the parameters of reaction kinetics to be determined and chemical mechanisms to be tested. However, observations are also affected by processes within the chambers that must be considered when interpreting experiments. This work compares results from experiments conducted in two chambers: the outdoor chamber SAPHIR at Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany and the indoor chamber IASC at University College Cork in Ireland. The experiments were conducted on the same hydrocarbon oxidation processes. Box model calculations that included the chemical mechanisms of the species under study and the chemical and physical processes related to the chambers demonstrate good agreement between the modelled and measured time series of the observed species. This shows that the effects of the chambers were accurately characterised. The results could be used as a template for quality assurance and quality control protocols for simulation chambers, particularly within the ACTRIS research infrastructure.

How to cite: Fuchs, H., Wills, P., Campos-Pineda, M., Saito, S., Brik, A. B., Roman, C., Chandran, S., Wenger, J., Novelli, A., Färber, M., Gu, Y., Kharee, P., Tillmann, R., Wilson, D., Wegener, R., Adam, M. G., Bohn, B., and Ruth, A. A.: Comparison of the results of hydrocarbon oxidation experiments in an indoor and an outdoor atmospheric simulation chamber, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5980, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5980, 2026.