EGU26-7466, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7466
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 08:30–10:15 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall A, A.141
Validation of ADCP Velocity Measurements in Open-Channel Flow Using PIV and CFD
Mohammd Tanvir Haque Tuhin1,2, Marc Ladwig3, Mudassar Razzaq4, Florian B. Zirngibl3, Daniel P. Gradzki3, Marcel Gurris4, Ralph Lindken3, Reinhard Hinkelmann2, and Christoph Mudersbach1
Mohammd Tanvir Haque Tuhin et al.
  • 1Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Hydromechanics, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bochum, Germany (mohammd.tuhin@hs-bochum.de)
  • 2Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Water Resources Management and Modeling of Hydrosystems, Institute of Civil Engineering, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Thermo- and Fluid Dynamics, Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Bochum, Germany
  • 4Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Bochum, Germany

Accurate experimental characterization of velocity profiles in open-channel flows is essential for hydraulic research and field-scale monitoring; however, the performance of Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) near flow boundaries remains insufficiently constrained due to acoustic blind zones and instrument-induced biases. This contribution presents a comprehensive multi-method validation framework combining laboratory-scale Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), ADCP measurements, and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to quantify ADCP accuracy and limitations under controlled conditions.

Initial experiments were conducted in a straight rectangular flume under six steady flow conditions spanning Reynolds numbers from 6.5 × 10⁴ to 1.76 × 10⁵. High-resolution 2D2C-PIV provided near-wall velocity measurements with millimeter-scale spatial resolution and served as the primary experimental reference. ADCP measurements were obtained using a 3 MHz profiler (RS5). Validated CFD simulations reproduced the mean velocity profiles across the full flow depth and were used to complement regions inaccessible to acoustic measurements.

Results show that ADCP-derived mean velocities agree well with both PIV and CFD in the core flow region, with typical deviations within ±3–5%. Larger discrepancies occur in the lower and upper parts of the water column, where ADCP velocities exhibit depth-dependent measurement bias of up to 25–30% at low Reynolds numbers, associated with blanking distance, reduced signal correlation, and side-lobe interference. A tendency toward reduced velocity discrepancies with increasing Reynolds number is observed in the lower part of the water column, although the trend is not strictly monotonic across all flow cases. Consistent agreement between PIV and CFD confirms that the observed deviations primarily arise from instrumental limitations rather than flow physics. Building on these validated results, ongoing work focuses on optimizing ADCP configuration parameters, developing CFD- and PIV-assisted blind-zone reconstruction strategies, and extending the framework toward instrument-aware CFD and field-scale applications. The study establishes a reproducible benchmark for ADCP validation and provides practical guidance for interpreting acoustic velocity measurements in laboratory and natural open-channel flows.

How to cite: Tuhin, M. T. H., Ladwig, M., Razzaq, M., Zirngibl, F. B., Gradzki, D. P., Gurris, M., Lindken, R., Hinkelmann, R., and Mudersbach, C.: Validation of ADCP Velocity Measurements in Open-Channel Flow Using PIV and CFD, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-7466, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7466, 2026.