EGU26-9308, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9308
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall A, A.14
Detection of Groundwater–surface water Contributions in a Subarctic Stream using Distributed Temperature Sensing, Topographic Indices, and Spatial Hydrological Model
Parsa Parvizi1, Hannu Marttila1, Samuli Launiainen2, Pertti Ala-aho1, Jari-Pekka Nousu2,4, Danny Croghan1, and Ilkka Martinkauppi3
Parsa Parvizi et al.
  • 1University of Oulu, Faculty of Technology, Eater and Environmental Engineering Unit, Finland (parsa.parvizi@oulu.fi)
  • 2Natural Resource Research Institute of Finland - Luke
  • 3Geological Survey Finland (GTK), Oulu, Finland
  • 4Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France

Groundwater (GW) seepage into streams plays a crucial role in sustaining streamflow and regulating thermal regimes in boreal and arctic headwaters. However, spatial variation of seepage and interactions with the stream network remain difficult to observe, especially in snow-dominated catchments with seasonal freezing. This study used high-resolution distributed temperature sensing (DTS) to identify groundwater and surface-water contributions along a sub-arctic headwater stream in northern Finland. Stream temperature was continuously monitored at 2 m spatial and 30 min temporal resolution over a 2 km reach. Seasonal slope-based thermal patterns were used to distinguish stream sections dominated by groundwater inflow. In addition, melt-active nights with observed snow cover and elevated stream discharge were used to capture surface and near-surface inputs to the stream. These DTS-derived signals were compared with commonly used terrain-based predictors, including upslope contributing area (UCA) and topographic wetness index (TWI), as well as with lateral inflow simulations from the SpaFHy-2D hydrological model. The results show that topography-based indices captured broad-scale surface convergence but failed to consistently identify local groundwater discharge zones. SpaFHy-2D reproduced the general distribution of major groundwater-influenced reaches but shows local mismatches, particularly in esker-controlled sections. This study highlights the value of in-stream temperature observations and hydrological modeling for detecting groundwater–surface water interactions in cold-region, where strong seasonality and snow-dominated hydrology limit traditional field methods.

How to cite: Parvizi, P., Marttila, H., Launiainen, S., Ala-aho, P., Nousu, J.-P., Croghan, D., and Martinkauppi, I.: Detection of Groundwater–surface water Contributions in a Subarctic Stream using Distributed Temperature Sensing, Topographic Indices, and Spatial Hydrological Model, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-9308, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9308, 2026.