4-9 September 2022, Bonn, Germany
EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts
Vol. 19, EMS2022-95, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2022-95
EMS Annual Meeting 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

The Intricacies of Identifying Equatorial Waves

Peter Knippertz1, Maria Gehne2, George N. Kiladis2, Kazuyoshi Kikuchi3, Athul Rasheeda Satheesh1, Paul E. Roundy4, Gui-Ying Yang5, Nedjeljka Žagar6, Juliana Dias2, Andreas H. Fink1, John Methven7, Andreas Schlueter8, Frank Sielmann6, and Matthew C. Wheeler9
Peter Knippertz et al.
  • 1Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 2NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 3International Pacific Research Center, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
  • 4Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA
  • 5National Centre for Atmospheric Science and University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • 6Meteorological Institute, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  • 7Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • 8Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • 9Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Equatorial waves (EWs) are synoptic- to planetary-scale propagating disturbances at low latitudes with periods from a few days to several weeks. Here this term includes Kelvin waves, equatorial Rossby waves, mixed-Rossby gravity waves and inertio-gravity waves, which are well described by linear wave theory, but also other tropical disturbances such as easterly waves and the intraseasonal Madden-Julian Oscillation with more complex dynamics. EWs can couple with deep convection, leading to a substantial modulation of clouds and rainfall. EWs are amongst the dynamic features of the troposphere with the longest intrinsic predictability and models are beginning to forecast them with an exploitable level of skill. Most of the methods developed to identify and objectively isolate EWs in observations and model fields rely on (or at least refer to) the adiabatic, frictionless linearized primitive equations on the sphere or the shallow water system on the equatorial β-plane. Common ingredients to these methods are zonal wavenumber-frequency filtering (Fourier or wavelet) and/or projections onto predefined empirical or theoretical dynamical patterns. This paper gives an overview of six different methods to isolate EWs and their structures, discusses the underlying assumptions, evaluates the applicability to different problems and provides a systematic comparison based on a case study (20 February-20 May 2009) and a climatological analysis (2001-2018). In addition, the influence of different input fields (e.g. winds, geopotential, outgoing longwave radiation, rainfall) is investigated. Based on the results, we generally recommend employing a combination of wavenumber-frequency filtering and spatial-projection methods (and of different input fields) to check for robustness of the identified signal. In cases of disagreement, one needs to carefully investigate which assumptions made for the individual methods are most probably not fulfilled. This will help choose an approach optimally suited to a given problem at hand and avoid misinterpretation of the results. 

How to cite: Knippertz, P., Gehne, M., Kiladis, G. N., Kikuchi, K., Rasheeda Satheesh, A., Roundy, P. E., Yang, G.-Y., Žagar, N., Dias, J., Fink, A. H., Methven, J., Schlueter, A., Sielmann, F., and Wheeler, M. C.: The Intricacies of Identifying Equatorial Waves, EMS Annual Meeting 2022, Bonn, Germany, 5–9 Sep 2022, EMS2022-95, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2022-95, 2022.

Supporters & sponsors