EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts
Vol. 22, EMS2025-167, 2025, updated on 30 Jun 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2025-167
EMS Annual Meeting 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Skill assessment of seasonal forecasts for crop breeding in the Nordic and Baltic region
Otto Hyvärinen and Andrea Vajda
Otto Hyvärinen and Andrea Vajda
  • Finnish Meteorological Institute, Weather and Climate Change Impact Research, Helsinki, Finland (otto.hyvarinen@fmi.fi)

In Northern Europe, crop growth conditions are specific due to harsh local climate and day length. The NorBalFoodSec project aims at increasing food security in the Nordic and Baltic regions by increasing knowledge on how to better adapt crop breeding and agricultural production to future climates. As part of the project, tailored seasonal climate forecasts relevant for agri-food production are developed and issued to crop breeders to improve the quality of crop management. The limitations in predictability of key variables for growing season, i.e. temperature and precipitation, are investigated and the findings presented.  We have post-processed and evaluated the skill of temperature and precipitation from SEAS5 seasonal forecast system from ECMWF using the CSTools package for R, which implements most of commonly used methods from the literature. These methods range from the simple bias removal to the ensemble calibration methods that correct the bias, the overall forecast variance and the ensemble spread. In addition, we have explored EMOS (nonhomogeneous regression) that makes it easier to add additional information. For precipitation, downscaling methods from CSTools were also explored.  

The skill of the forecasts varies depending on the season and the temporal and spatial aggregation of the forecast data. The use of different verification measures also leads to different estimates of how long the forecast is still skillful: Simpler, non-proper, measures, such as anomaly correlation, indicate skillful forecasts for up to four months, while stricter, proper, measures, such as CRPS, indicate skillful forecasts for only one to two months. Therefore, engaging in discussions with users is crucial to understand what types of forecasts would be most beneficial for them. As the next step, indicators will be developed for breeders based on these variables, such as the widely used Growing Degree Days (GDD) and novel indicators tailored to specific regional needs. 

How to cite: Hyvärinen, O. and Vajda, A.: Skill assessment of seasonal forecasts for crop breeding in the Nordic and Baltic region, EMS Annual Meeting 2025, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 7–12 Sep 2025, EMS2025-167, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2025-167, 2025.