EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts
Vol. 22, EMS2025-420, 2025, updated on 30 Jun 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2025-420
EMS Annual Meeting 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluation of ensemble prediction systems in terms of solar irradiance in Germany
Frederik Kurzrock1, Marie Mähnert1, Bernhard Mayer2, Philipp Gregor2, Anthony Voitus1, and Nicolas Schmutz1
Frederik Kurzrock et al.
  • 1Reuniwatt, Sainte Clotilde, Réunion, France
  • 2Meteorologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

In solar power forecasting, the consideration of uncertainties in the forecast is becoming increasingly important and is being taken into account more and more. Ensemble predictions systems (EPS) can provide information about the uncertainty of cloud cover and solar irradiance. The goal of this study is to evaluate the quality of different operational ensemble predictions systems in Germany in terms of global horizontal irradiance (GHI). Therefore, the models ICON-EU-EPS (horizontal grid spacing approx. 13 km, 40 members), ICON-D2-EPS (horizontal grid spacing approx. 2 km, 20 members), IFS-ENS (horizontal grid spacing approx. 9 km, 50 members), GEFS (horizontal grid spacing approx. 28 km, 30 members), MOGREPS-G (horizontal grid spacing approx. 20 km, 17 members), and WRF-Solar-EPS (horizontal grid spacing 9 and 3 km, 30 members) are evaluated. The 00UTC run is considered for all models. The evaluation period is summer 2024 (1st of June to 31st of August) with observational GHI data for 25 sites from Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). A quality check of the observational data reveals that more than 99% of the available observational data is of high quality. For reasons of computational time, WRF-Solar-EPS forecasts are evaluated for four selected days only. The forecast quality is evaluated using rank histograms and the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) among other metrics. The results show that the quality is similar for all models, while WRF-Solar-EPS does not necessarily stand out despite its higher spatial resolution. The rank histograms reveal that 38-46% of the observations lie outside of the range of all members, meaning that all models are highly over-confident. Post-processing methods and model calibration are not part of this study but seem necessary to increase the forecast reliability.

How to cite: Kurzrock, F., Mähnert, M., Mayer, B., Gregor, P., Voitus, A., and Schmutz, N.: Evaluation of ensemble prediction systems in terms of solar irradiance in Germany, EMS Annual Meeting 2025, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 7–12 Sep 2025, EMS2025-420, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2025-420, 2025.