Europlanet Science Congress 2022
Palacio de Congresos de Granada, Spain
18 – 23 September 2022
Europlanet Science Congress 2022
Palacio de Congresos de Granada, Spain
18 September – 23 September 2022
EPSC Abstracts
Vol. 16, EPSC2022-542, 2022, updated on 23 Sep 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2022-542
Europlanet Science Congress 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Exploring the variability of the Venusian Thermosphere with the IPSL Venus GCM

Antoine Martinez1, Sebastien Lebonnois1, Enora Moisan1, Ehouarn Millour1, Thomas Pierron1, Gabriella Gilli2,3, and Franck Lefevre4
Antoine Martinez et al.
  • 1Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD/IPSL), CNRS, Paris, France (antoine.martinez@lmd.ipsl.fr)
  • 2Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucia (IAA-CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomia s/n, Granada, España
  • 3Instituto de Astrofisica e Ciencias do Espaço (IA), OAL, Tapada da Ajuda, PT1349-018 Lisboa, Portugal
  • 4LATMOS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Versailles St Quentin, Paris
  • Introduction

                    Based on the simulations provided by the IPSL Venus GCM, our team is now ready to offer access to a reference climatological model for use by the scientific community that study the atmosphere of Venus and by engineers that develop mission designs and instrumentation for Venus exploration. The VCD is now available (see http://www-venus.lmd.jussieu.fr), and provides a climatology (mean values and variability) for many characteristics of the Venusian atmosphere from the surface to the exosphere, validated against available observations.

In order to provide a predicted atmosphere reproducing as closely as possible the observations, a few adjustments and tunings were done to the IPSL Venus GCM model ([1,2]) basic processes in the context of the Venus Climate Database (VCD). To validate the thermosphere model and tuning, temperature, mass density and number densities measurements from Pioneer Venus, Magellan and Venus Express mission are used around the equator and at the poles for maximum and minimum-intermediate solar cycle conditions. 

The results of these improvements, tuning and comparisons will be presented in this study.

 

  • Recent improvements and tuning

Improvements have been made on the parameterization of non-LTE CO2 near-infrared heating and on the parameterization of non-orographic gravity waves. To reproduce O and CO number densities in the thermosphere, a tuning was done by increasing significantly (by a factor 10) the photodissociation of CO2 into CO and O for altitudes above 135 km. This raises many questions that we are currently investigating: role of the ionospheric chemistry and uncertainties associated with the molecular diffusion. The validation was performed using temperature, number densities and mass density data from the Pioneer Venus, Magellan and Venus Express missions.

 

  • Results and raised questions

Despite the initial underestimation of the atomic oxygen number density above 130-140 km by a factor of 10, the increase by the same factor of the CO2 photodissociation into O and CO above these altitudes range allow to fit very well the vertical profile of the PV-ONMS number density and to reproduce the temperature and density evolution of the Venusian thermosphere during high solar activity (180-230 s.f.u). The reduction of the nightside temperature compared to [3] comes mainly from changes in the non-orographic gravity wave parameterization. Our results suggest that the increase of their amplitude and the altitude where the waves break (above 130 km) have weakened the day-to-night transport. The difficulty in tuning the GW parameterization comes from the lack of systematic GW observations which are necessary to constrain the model parameters. However, observations of wave structure at 140 km altitude and above 160-200 km altitude at the poles led us to parameterize our GWs so that they propagate above 140 km.

  • Acknowledgements

The PV-ONMS neutral densities are obtained from the Planetary Data System (PDS) (https://pds.nasa.gov/). The authors thank Robert H. Tolson for providing Magellan aerobraking and PV-OAD data, Moa Persson, Ingo Müller-Wodarg and Pascal Rosenblatt for providing the Venus Express VExADE datasets, as well as François Lott for his advices on the GW parameterization. This work was funded by ESA under the contract No. 4000130261/20/NL/CRS. The IPSL VGCM simulations were done thanks to the High-Performance Computing (HPC) resources of Centre Informatique National de l'Enseignement Supérieur (CINES) under the allocation n°A0100110391 made by Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif (GENCI).

 

  • References

[1] Lebonnois, S., Hourdin, F., Eymet, V., Crespin, A., Fournier, R., Forget, F., 2010. J. Geophys. Res. (Planets) 115, 6006. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003458.

[2] Lebonnois, S., Sugimoto, N., Gilli, G., 2016. Icarus 278, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.06.004.

[3] Gilli, G., Lebonnois, S., González-Galindo, F., López-Valverde, M.A., Stolzenbach, A., Lefèvre, F., Chaufray, J.-Y., Lott, F., Icarus, Vol 281, 2017, 55-72, 0019-1035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.09.016.

How to cite: Martinez, A., Lebonnois, S., Moisan, E., Millour, E., Pierron, T., Gilli, G., and Lefevre, F.: Exploring the variability of the Venusian Thermosphere with the IPSL Venus GCM, Europlanet Science Congress 2022, Granada, Spain, 18–23 Sep 2022, EPSC2022-542, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2022-542, 2022.

Discussion

We are sorry, but the discussion is only available for users who registered for the conference. Thank you.