EPSC Abstracts
Vol. 19, EPSC2026-887, 2026, updated on 02 Jul 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2026-887
Europlanet Science Congress 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 10 Sep, 18:00–19:30 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 10 Sep, 08:30–19:30| Foyer 3, F3.27
Influence of orbital perturbations on the Polar Motion of the Galilean satellites
Alexis Coyette1, Rose-Marie Baland2, Marie Yseboodt2, and Tim Van Hoolst2,3
Alexis Coyette et al.
  • 1naXys Institute, UNamur, Namur, Belgium (alexis.coyette@unamur.be)
  • 2Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
  • 3Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

The oblateness of Jupiter, the perturbations induced by the Sun, and the mutual perturbations between the Galilean satellites, cause their orbital motion to deviate from a purely Keplerian orbit. In particular, the inclination, eccentricity, node and pericenter precession rates of each moon vary with time. These non-uniform orbital motions can be represented through periodic series expansions. From these series, corresponding periodic terms in the rotational response of the satellites can be derived. In the case of orbital node precession, the spin axis response consists of a dominant precessional motion accompanied by smaller nutation terms.

In this work, we extend the rotation model presented by Coyette et al. (2026), in which we assumed osculating orbits, to account for these orbital perturbations. Our dynamical model, based on an angular momentum formalism, couples the polar motion to the precession and nutation of the spin axis. Solving the equations up to second order in small quantities for osculating orbits allowed us to identify two polar motions: one at the diurnal frequency and another associated with the frequency of the precession of the pericenter longitude.

Using periodic series expansions for the orbital elements, we further identify additional polar motion terms superimposed on the two previously identified contributions. Some of these newly identified terms can reach amplitudes comparable to, or even larger than, those of the original polar motions.

References:

Coyette, A., Baland, R.-M., Van Hoolst, T., 2026. Second-order modeling of the Cassini states of large satellites: I. Influence of triaxiality and a subsurface ocean. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 138:3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-025-10269-9

How to cite: Coyette, A., Baland, R.-M., Yseboodt, M., and Van Hoolst, T.: Influence of orbital perturbations on the Polar Motion of the Galilean satellites, Europlanet Science Congress 2026, The Hague, The Netherlands, 7–11 Sep 2026, EPSC2026-887, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2026-887, 2026.