- 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland (riku.jarvinen@fmi.fi)
- 2Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
- 3University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- 4Institute of Space Astrophysics and Planetology, INAF, Rome, Italy
- 5Space Research Institute Graz, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria
- 6Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen, Germany
- 7University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
We present a global hybrid-particle simulation study of Mercury's magnetosphere and plasma environment during BepiColombo's first three Mercury flybys, or swing-bys, (MFB1–3). We use the high-performance simulation code RHybrid (paRallel Hybrid) to model the interaction between the solar wind and the Hermean magnetosphere[1-3]. In the hybrid approach, ions are treated as macroscopic particle clouds (macroparticles), resolving the kinetic motion of ions via the Lorentz force. Electrons are described implicitly as a charge-neutralising, inertialess fluid governed by Ohm's law and a polytropic (adiabatic) closure. The kinetic ion dynamics are coupled to the evolution of the magnetic field through Ampère's and Faraday's laws. This approach allows ion velocity distributions to evolve self-consistently, capturing wave-particle interactions, finite Larmor radius effects, and other ion-kinetic processes. Mercury's surface is modelled as a particle-absorbing inner boundary, while the crust–mantle region is represented as a resistive spherical shell atop an ideally conducting core. The planetary magnetic field is modelled as a dipole offset northward from the planet's centre. The solar wind ion species include protons and alpha particles, and Na+ ions are produced by photoionisation of a neutral sodium exosphere profile.
For each flyby, we perform a dedicated simulation run using stationary upstream solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), and photoionisation conditions representative of the observed environment [3-9]. Mercury was near perihelion during MFB3, while MFB1 and MFB2 occurred when the planet was about halfway between perihelion and aphelion. Under the adopted conditions, the solar wind was densest and the IMF strongest during MFB3, the solar wind speed was highest during MFB2, and the Alfvén Mach number was highest during MFB1. From these simulations, we generate virtual spacecraft observations along the MFB1-3 trajectories and compare boundary crossings, particle populations, electric and magnetic field properties, and wave activity in different regions of Mercury's plasma environment. The study aims to investigate how variations in upstream solar wind and IMF conditions, and exospheric ion loading influence Mercury's magnetospheric structure across the three encounters. We will discuss the comparative analysis of the model runs with BepiColombo and MESSENGER observations, as well as other modelling efforts.
[1] https://github.com/fmihpc/rhybrid, https://planets.fmi.fi
[2] Jarvinen et al (2020), Ultra-low frequency waves in the ion foreshock of Mercury: A global hybrid modeling study, Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc., 491, 3, 4147-4161, doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3257
[3] Kallio et al. (2022), Ultra-low frequency waves in the Hermean magnetosphere: On the role of the morphology of the magnetic field and the foreshock, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, 24, doi:10.1029/2022GL101850
[4] Alberti et al. (2023), High-energy particle enhancements in the solar wind upstream Mercury during the first BepiColombo flyby: SERENA/PICAM and MPO-MAG observations, A&A 669, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244662
[5] Exner et al. (2020), Influence of Mercury's exosphere on the structure of the magnetosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125, e2019JA027691, 10.1029/2019JA027691
[6] Orsini et al. (2022), Inner southern magnetosphere observation of Mercury via SERENA ion sensors in BepiColombo mission, Nat. Commun. 13:7390, 10.1038/s41467-022-34988-x
[7] Rojo et al. (2025), Characterization of the solar wind context during the third Mercury flyby of BepiColombo A&A, 698, A221, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553870
[8] Teubenbacher et al. (2024), Solar wind entry into Mercury’s magnetosphere: Simulation results for the second swingby of BepiColombo, A&A, 681, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347789
[9] Teubenbacher et al. (2025), Hybrid modeling of Mercury’s magnetosphere: Assessing accuracy in ion counting statistics, A&A, 698, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453452
How to cite: Jarvinen, R., Grant, S., Kallio, E., Edwards, L., Milillo, A., Varsani, A., Exner, W., Dewey, R., Raines, J., Honkonen, I., Phillips, D. N. H., Borg, M., and Dubyagin, S.: Global hybrid modelling of Mercury's plasma environment in light of BepiColombo's first three flybys, Europlanet Science Congress 2026, The Hague, The Netherlands, 7–11 Sep 2026, EPSC2026-892, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2026-892, 2026.