T10-21 | Inclusive science-policy-society interfaces

T10-21

Inclusive science-policy-society interfaces
Orals
| Fri, 06 Jun, 10:30–12:00 (CEST)|Room 4
Orals |
Fri, 10:30
Further information on the theme is available at: https://one-ocean-science-2025.org/programme/themes.html#T10

Orals: Fri, 6 Jun | Room 4

Chairperson: Carlos M. Duarte
10:30–10:40
|
OOS2025-830
|
ECOP
Larisse Faroni-Perez and Omar R. López Alfano

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) marked a milestone in 2023 when the 19 Member States approved the creation of the Transdisciplinary Ocean Science Program during its Conference of the Parties (IAI CoP 31). Since then, the IAI has established itself as a leading regional platform addressing critical challenges at the ocean-climate-biodiversity-governance nexus, while also considering socio-economic issues impacting coastal communities. This presentation highlights the advancements made under the Transdisciplinary Ocean Science Program, showcasing ongoing collaborations, strategic partnerships, and upcoming funding opportunities across the Americas and beyond, particularly through the Collaborative Research Action Oceans 2 call by the Belmont Forum. 
 
The IAI’s Transdisciplinary Ocean Science Program promotes solutions-oriented research and actions by fostering collaboration among diverse stakeholders, including scientific communities, local populations, and indigenous knowledge systems. Among the key initiatives supported by the IAI is the Sargassum project, funded by the Development Bank of Latin America (CAF). This project tackles the ecological and socio-economic impacts of Sargassum blooms in the Caribbean. Another standout initiative is the Blue One Health project, led in Brazil by Fiocruz. This networking initiative investigates the interconnections between ocean health, biodiversity, and human health to strengthen governance frameworks across Latin America and the Caribbean.  
 
Additionally, the Science, Technology, and Policy (STeP) program has empowered science diplomacy fellows to address marine pollution, with a particular focus on plastic policies. These fellows have analyzed initiatives at international, national, and subnational levels to advance knowledge and develop innovative governance models, culminating in the publication of two influential policy articles. The STeP program equips emerging leaders with the skills necessary to effectively integrate scientific evidence into policymaking, thereby enhancing the capacity of countries across the Americas to tackle complex environmental challenges effectively.  
 
The IAI’s Science Diplomacy Center continues to strengthen its role by convening multi-stakeholder dialogues and building capacity. A recent training session in Panama exemplified this commitment, uniting policymakers, scientists, and community leaders to address governance challenges in estuarine regions. This initiative highlighted the critical importance of science diplomacy, promoted regional collaboration, and strengthened evidence-based decision-making, culminating in the publication of a comprehensive white paper.   
 
Looking ahead, the IAI is actively preparing for the CRA Oceans 2 call by the Belmont Forum, emphasizing the training of researchers for transdisciplinary initiatives and the funding of collaborative research projects aligned with global priorities. These efforts aim to enhance the IAI’s transdisciplinary ocean science framework, driving critical research at the nexus of ocean health, climate change, biodiversity, and governance, while addressing socio-economic challenges in coastal communities.  
 
In summary, the IAI is a key intergovernmental regional actor in bridging science, policy, and societal needs to advance sustainable ocean governance, fostering resilient and equitable futures for coastal communities across the Americas and beyond.

How to cite: Faroni-Perez, L. and López Alfano, O. R.: Integrating Science, Policy, and Society for Ocean Governance and Sustainability , One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-830, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-830, 2025.

10:40–10:50
|
OOS2025-1478
The Ocean Panel as an example of successful ocean science diplomacy 
(withdrawn)
tom pickerell and oliver ashford
10:50–11:00
|
OOS2025-1097
|
ECOP
Ginevra Capurso, Emiliano Ramieri, Laura Bastide, Antti Belinskij, Laura Friedrich, Sašo Gorjanc, Cristian Passarello, Froukje Maria Platjouw, Pulina Ramirez-Monsalve, Niko Soininen, Pierre Strosser, Seline Trevisanut, Saskia Trubbach, and Andrea Barbanti

Science-policy-society interfaces (SPSI) are defined as social processes that encompass relations between scientists and other actors in the policy process, allowing for exchange, co-evolution, and joint construction of knowledge to enrich decision-making (Van Den Hove, 2007). When optimal, SPSIs support sound policy formulation, implementation, and adaptation processes, and can help address different challenges, such as incomplete knowledge, unpredictability, uncertainty, and ambiguity. In this way, SPSIs can improve coherence and cross-compliance in ocean governance. Science, in this framework, is responsive to societal needs (including values and concerns), to public engagement, and to the role of society as a provider of data, information, and knowledge.

CrossGov is a Horizon Europe-funded project aiming to evaluate how the coherence and cross-compliance of marine-related policies and legislation affect the ability to realise the European Union Green Deal (EGD) goals for the protection of marine ecosystems and biodiversity, zero pollution, and nature-based climate adaptation and mitigation. In the frame of this project, we analysed how efficiently and effectively SPSIs can contribute to sound policy-making and decision-making and enhance policy coherence and cross-compliance.

For this aim, a comprehensive, flexible and original methodology for SPSI self-assessment and the identification of gaps and related solutions was developed. This methodology can be applied to single or multiple marine policies and proposes a step-by-step operational procedure for the analysis. At the core of the methodology are 6 Building Blocks, i.e. the main constituent elements of SPSI that are potentially relevant to EGD-related marine legislation and other policies at different scales, ranging from data to assessments, models of scientific advice and knowledge transfer mechanisms, SPSI platforms, competence framework and funding and resources.

The methodology was applied to assess SPSIs both at the policy formulation (on specific policy clusters) and policy implementation stages (through case studies in different EU sea basins). The aim was to research: (i) how SPSIs are regulated and what scope they are designed for; (ii) under which conditions scientific knowledge is taken up in policy formulation/implementation; (iii) which tools and approaches supporting the transfer of knowledge for policy-making are prevalent in various policy areas; (iv) which practical challenges arise for SPSIs in a variety of institutional, cultural and policy contexts; (v) how these challenges affect directly or indirectly policy coherence and what are solutions for addressing them.

The analysis was co-developed involving experts and stakeholders, from local to EU. It highlighted the diversity of existing science-for-policy ecosystems, of practices related to SPSI functioning, of (likely) effectiveness and their impacts as well as of solutions that can strengthen SPSI so as to best contribute to policy coherence. It highlighted the added-value and relevance of the proposed SPSI assessment for both ex-ante and ex-post (single and multiple) policy evaluation.

The portfolio of solutions and recommendations to respond to the needs identified in the analysis is being developed through a co-creation process engaging SPSI experts at the EU level through focus groups and will be compiled in a structured blueprint, to then emphasize how better SPSI may contribute to effective ocean governance.

How to cite: Capurso, G., Ramieri, E., Bastide, L., Belinskij, A., Friedrich, L., Gorjanc, S., Passarello, C., Platjouw, F. M., Ramirez-Monsalve, P., Soininen, N., Strosser, P., Trevisanut, S., Trubbach, S., and Barbanti, A.: Assessing the role and functioning of Science Policy Society Interfaces in supporting the coherent implementation of EU Green Deal-related marine policies, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1097, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1097, 2025.

11:00–11:10
|
OOS2025-611
Pierre-Yves Le Meur, Valelia Muni Toke, and Anouk Barberousse

In the wake of the update of its deep-sea national strategy in 2020, the French government commissioned a collective scientific assessment on deep sea knowledge and governance issues (2022-2025) that is carried out by the French National Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD). This scientific assessment has two objectives. 

First, it aims to present an overview of (i) the different knowledge registers (scientific, professional, administrative, legal, indigenous knowledge) relating to the deep sea, (ii) current and potential/future uses of the deep sea and associated impacts, and (iii) governance arrangements of these spaces. In addition to these three thematic areas, cross-cutting questions focus on issues of ethics, risk and uncertainty in its different guises, temporalities (the pace of scientific knowledge production as well as the unfolding of deep sea uses and impacts), justice (including epistemic justice), and inequalities (e.g. the North/South divide between knowledge producers and users). 

The second objective is to produce a set of recommendations to inform national deep-sea policy. The aim of these recommendations is not to choose a substantive option (e.g. marine conservation vs. deep sea mineral exploitation), but to propose a procedural rationale for articulating a deep-sea policy framework.

The enactment of this three-year, multidisciplinary program (anthropology, philosophy, oceanography, biology, geology, economics) actually departs from its linear design as it revealed to be a permanent work of co-construction: of the demand (what are the government’s expectations if any?), the supply (compiling existing knowledge or producing new knowledge if only by linking different sources and registers of knowledge?), process monitoring (by negotiating the inclusion of French Pacific Overseas Territories’ representatives in the steering committee), its regional resonance (through the construction of two regional dialogue platforms). This constructivist perspective on the expertise process will enrich the reflection on the epistemological and political status of the kind of initiative aiming at strengthening science-policy-society interfaces.

How to cite: Le Meur, P.-Y., Muni Toke, V., and Barberousse, A.: The Co-Construction of Everything: The Case of a Collective Scientific Assessment on Deep Sea Knowledge and Governance in the Pacific, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-611, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-611, 2025.

11:10–11:20
|
OOS2025-1140
|
ECOP
Cora Hörstmann, Erin Satterthwaite, Renis Auma Ojwala, Laura Elser, Ellen Johannesen, Maartje Oostdijk, Talen Rimmer, and Paris Stefanoudis

Given that ocean-related challenges are increasingly globalized, complex, and interconnected, international collaboration is essential to move toward a sustainable future and to achieve the overarching goals of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. To effectively address these challenges, it is crucial to engage diverse people from different regions, backgrounds, and sectors. However, there is still a lack of integration of experiential knowledge and diverse perspectives in ocean science to enhance the full participation of marginalised and economically disadvantaged groups. These experts are often excluded from discussions regarding ocean governance and management strategies in most countries globally. 

To overcome these barriers, some organizations have already established policies and practices to foster diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). However, these practices often only exist in formalized documents but are not adopted in practice due to deeply rooted organizational culture and systemic biases. Further, these practices are not transparent or easily accessible, which impedes other institutions and projects from building on existing knowledge to identify transformative and universal solutions. To increase diverse participation in ocean science, gaps should be identified and addressed. 

The UN Ocean Decade ECOP DEI task team comprises a diverse group of professionals spanning many regions of the world and connected to various Ocean Decade Programmes. Together with the endorsed Ocean Practices programme, the task team is exploring innovation in how we, as a community of ocean professionals, conduct co-design in the context of co-producing knowledge and co-developing solutions. Here, we present a gap analysis in the form of a literature review and results from a survey across all Ocean Decade actions on effective strategies to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion. We identify strategies that are cross-cutting, and interoperable and can thus become standardized best practices advancing DEI within the Ocean Decade. Our aim is to support a transformational change in how Ocean Decade Challenges can be collaboratively addressed. 

The presented results from the survey capture the needs and existing solutions for fostering diverse participation in the co-design of ocean initiatives, offering actionable insights for informed decision-making. Additionally, the survey highlights the specific needs of the ocean professional community and showcases the progress, challenges, and tools that organizations are using to achieve DEI-related goals within the Ocean Decade. Our aim is to make these practices findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR), thereby advancing inclusivity and eliminating discrimination in this transformative period. By creating avenues for collaborative knowledge-sharing relating to DEI in the Ocean Decade, this work will broadly apply to partner organizations striving to make visible and meaningful progress for a more inclusive, accessible ocean.

How to cite: Hörstmann, C., Satterthwaite, E., Auma Ojwala, R., Elser, L., Johannesen, E., Oostdijk, M., Rimmer, T., and Stefanoudis, P.: Strategies and best practices for fostering diverse engagement in international collaborations, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1140, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1140, 2025.

11:20–11:30
|
OOS2025-617
|
ECOP
|
Arne Langlet, Alice Vadrot, and Felix Wurm

The integration of marine biodiversity monitoring data into policy and decision-making has remained limited despite numerous efforts to bridge the gap between science and policy. This may be because traditional approaches to science-policy interfaces often segment stakeholders into predefined groups, such as scientists, policymakers, and civil society and assume a bi- or tri-lateral bridging to occur. But this rigid classification often falls short of capturing the complexities of how different actors engage with marine biodiversity knowledge and data. At the same time a lack of understanding persists on the actual data practices of the individuals involved in the marine biodiversity monitoring knowledge value chain from local marine observation sites to universities and national or regional decision-making bodies, i.e. how do individuals engage with marine biodiversity data, what types of data do they use, for what purposes, what challenges do they encounter and what tools do they need.

This study explores these practices through the lens of a Community of Practice (CoP), in which individuals in the marine biodiversity monitoring domain share practices through common engagement with marine biodiversity data. Based on the results of a large online survey, this study applies a latent class analysis (LCA), to examine communities of shared data practices that transcend conventional actor boundaries. We identify three latent types of engaging with marine biodiversity monitoring data: scientific data producers, data managers and analysists, and policy-oriented data appliers and find that data literacy is a major barrier of preventing increased engagement with marine biodiversity data.

The findings contribute with a social scientific view, underscoring the significance of a person- and practice-oriented approach over an affiliation-oriented analysis by illustrating how certain practices extend across traditional actor boundaries, while also uncovering distinct patterns within these communities. This research advocates for a dynamic, community-driven model of science-policy-society interfaces that transcends conventional bi-or tri-lateral frameworks. By re-envisioning science-policy interfaces as inclusive data-policy interfaces, where individuals from various sectors collaboratively develop and share data practices, the study promotes a more integrated and action-oriented vision for environmental governance.

Additionally, the results highlight the pressing need for capacity building and training to enhance data literacy, empowering diverse stakeholders to engage meaningfully with marine biodiversity monitoring data. This inclusive, multi-faceted strategy supports the shift necessary to ensure that science reliably informs ocean decision-making, enabling proactive, data driven governance for sustainable and informed ocean action.

How to cite: Langlet, A., Vadrot, A., and Wurm, F.: From Science-Policy to Data-Policy Interfaces: Unpacking Biodiversity Monitoring Data Practices, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-617, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-617, 2025.

11:30–11:40
|
OOS2025-1039
Selina Stead

The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) is co-designing a new concept: Borderless Ocean Sustainability Science – an interdisciplinary systems thinking and open innovation approach for accelerating decision-making on action required to tackle ocean problems in Australia and beyond.

Climate change is warming Australia’s oceans faster than ever before.  In 2024, scientists from the AIMS’ Long Term Monitoring Program (LTMP) recorded the largest annual decline (in AIMS’ 39-years of monitoring) for hard coral cover - percentage of live coral on the reef surface - in sections of the Great Barrier Reef.

AIMS is working with indigenous communities and industry to find new ways to measure the efficacy of marine science policy.  The approach is based on rewarding good ocean governance, to understand why strategies that cut across a range of habitats, species and sectors, succeed or fail.

Australia’s oceans, like so many worldwide, face unprecedented pressure from biodiversity loss, climate change, geo-political instability, pollution, population growth and wealth inequality. Yet, tropical oceans remain under sampled and under measured relative to other parts of the earth such as the atmosphere. This lack of data makes it harder to answer important scientific questions and develop effective strategies for managing marine resources sustainably.

This presentation will share case studies to illustrate how AIMS is working with strategic partners and end-users of its marine science and marine technology innovations, to inform sustainable management, science diplomacy and science-informed policy of ocean use.

Data collection is often divided into narrow categories (e.g., coastal vs. offshore, shallow vs. deep) and at different levels (e.g., species or habitat type), without considering the broader, long-term impacts needed for effective management and policy.  AIMS is investing in applying systems thinking and open innovation through interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research methods so that its scientific knowledge addresses complex marine ecosystem issues such as coral bleaching and the effects of cyclones and excess rainfall on sedimentation and reduced water quality over large areas. 

This paper highlights how AIMS' investment in its Indigenous Partnership team helps combine scientific evidence with Indigenous knowledge. We recognise that local perceptions influence attitudes and in turn behaviours, such as choosing to comply or break regulatory or unwritten rules of sea country. The examples shared demonstrate the impact of inclusive collaboration in ocean science on partnerships between industry, policy and society when using good governance in a warming world.

How to cite: Stead, S.: Borderless Ocean Sustainability Science, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1039, 2025.

11:40–12:00

Posters on site | Poster area "La Baleine"

Display time: Tue, 3 Jun, 17:00–Thu, 5 Jun, 20:00
P758
|
OOS2025-212
Marinez Scherer

The interplay between science and policy is a complex and multifaceted relationship, particularly in dynamic fields like Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) and Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM). Drawing on nearly two years of experience at Brazil’s Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, this perspective highlights the challenges of bridging these realms. Unlike controlled scientific experiments, policymaking offers no definitive methodologies, no before-and-after comparisons, and no universal guidelines, each scientist's journey is unique, shaped by their expertise and environment. Policymaking is a high-pressure, fast-paced process where decisions often need to be made on the spot, leaving little or no time to consult academic papers or even succinct policy briefs. Managers, who are often not scientists, face significant challenges in accessing and interpreting the vast range of knowledge necessary for informed decision-making. This necessary knowledge requires an ongoing education and capacity building for managers in leadership positions. Beyond internal challenges, managers must also engage with society, ensuring that planning and decision-making processes are inclusive and participatory. Societal involvement is critical for building trust and fostering a collective buy-in for policies, particularly in fields that directly affect local communities and stakeholders, like coastal and ocean management. Transparent communication and collaborative approaches help bridge the gap between technical expertise and public needs, ultimately strengthening the legitimacy and effectiveness of policy outcomes. Moreover, planning often feels like science fiction, as urgent, high-stakes issues emerge daily, some with the potential to shift national priorities and even impact international agendas. In this context, managers cannot rely solely on individual expertise, they must build and maintain networks of scientific colleagues and collaborators who can provide rapid, reliable insights when critical decisions must be made. Ultimately, the integration of science into policymaking requires adaptability, robust networks, and an acceptance of uncertainty. For scientists entering this domain, fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, advocating for better training of policymakers, and promoting societal participation are crucial steps toward bridging the science-policy gap and ensuring evidence-informed governance as essential strategies for impactful contributions.

How to cite: Scherer, M.: Science-Policy Interface: A Scientist's Journey in Coastal and Ocean Management in Brazil, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-212, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-212, 2025.

P759
|
OOS2025-300
Francesca Santoro, Paula Morandeira Barbeito, Valentina Lovat, Ana Vitoria Tereza de Magalhães, Esteban Gottfried Burguett, Gaia Maria Sole Intonti, Alessia Tombolini, and Jack Coulton

The ocean science, society, and policy interface represents a crucial collaboration where transdisciplinary research on ocean ecosystems and climate impacts shapes policies to manage and protect ocean resources. This synergy ensures that societal needs—ranging from economic reliance on fisheries to cultural and recreational values—are integrated into policy-making processes. Essential components include robust communication and public involvement, nurturing a society committed to ocean health. Comprehending human-ocean interactions requires appreciating the ocean in terms of its biophysical, cultural, social, intrinsic and economic value, alongside local and Indigenous knowledge, all connected to global social wellbeing. Consequently, critical ocean literacy empowers communities to make informed choices and champion sustainability. This collaboration supports adaptive management strategies that integrate new scientific findings, ensuring sustainable ocean use, conservation for future generations, and cohabitation with ocean life forms. This synergy enables adaptive management strategies that evolve with new scientific discoveries, ensuring sustainable ocean use and conservation for future generations. This presentation will illustrare how establishing cross-sectorial, national and cross-national partnerships to advocate for governance structures that  prioritize health of both humans and the ocean and that also address underlying political, economic, and ethical causes of planetary crisis will support the creation of effective science-society-policy interfaces

How to cite: Santoro, F., Morandeira Barbeito, P., Lovat, V., de Magalhães, A. V. T., Gottfried Burguett, E., Intonti, G. M. S., Tombolini, A., and Coulton, J.: Enhancing the science-society-policy interface through ocean literacy with and for all , One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-300, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-300, 2025.

P760
|
OOS2025-633
Dawn Wright

This presentation shares insights from the recent experience of the author as a US State Department Science Envoy for Ocean Sustainability participating in Partnership Opportunity Delegation (POD) visit to the small island developing state (SID) of Cabo Verde, Africa. PODs are highly curated, multi-day agendas of bilateral meetings, roundtables, and private networking events to explore areas for meaningful collaboration and partnerships to advance priorities in specific sectors and policy areas. They include a diverse range of ocean experts from industry, start-ups, academia, financial institutions, philanthropic organizations, non-profits, ecosystem developers, diasporans, and other government partners. The theme of the POD was Blue-Green Futures, held also under the auspices of the first Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation (a multilateral forum of 42 countries – Atlantic coastal N America, S America, Africa, Europe, Caribbean, putting the ocean at the center of US Atlantic diplomacy). We created SDG14-focused business-to-government, business-to-business, and scientific academic partnerships in marine and climate research, renewable energy, ports and shipping, aquaculture and seafood processing and packaging, eco-tourism, and information technology. In addition, we learned much about how the Cabo Verdean diaspora, especially in the northeastern US, is a critical and strategic pillar in the country’s conservation science and economic development. For example, 18% of the country’s GDP comes the diaspora in terms of remittances, purchases of goods and services, and direct investments, and will be a key driver in the growth of eco-tourism. Discussions with the Minister of the Sea, the Minister of Tourism, Minister of Finance, the Secretary of State for Digital Economy, and the Prime Minister himself were productive in further understanding the aspirations and activities of Cabo Verde in developing all aspects of their Blue Economy, on issues of biodiversity assessment and protection, their national strategies and action plans therein, and how this will be important for the economies across the entire Atlantic Cooperation. In sum, I argue that the example of a partnership opportunity delegation should proliferate all the more during the UN Ocean Decade as part of the vibrant science needed to inform, support, and accelerate ocean action.

How to cite: Wright, D.: Partnership Opportunity Delegations as an Inclusive and Effective Means of Science-Policy-Society Interfacing, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-633, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-633, 2025.

P761
|
OOS2025-668
Vanessa Sarah Salvo, Karen Soacha, Ana Alvarez, and Jaume Piera

The current environmental urgency means that we need data on the ocean, to understand its changes and potential solutions. Although citizen science data have been identified as a potential contribution to meeting international requirements (Fraisl et al., 2020; Fraisl et al., 2023; Danielsen et al., 2024), there is still a long way to go. The reporting requirements of official monitoring programmes, e.g. under MSFD 2008/56 EC or WFD 2000/60 EC, are still reluctant to integrate citizen science data, while some successful experiences at national level are already in place (e.g. descriptor 10 MSFD). On the other hand, due to the establishment of data libraries for the digital twin of the ocean there is an urgent requirement for data, including citizen science. Furthermore, consolidated structures are gathering and validating  citizen science data, such as specialised structures such as the MINKA citizen science observatory, or international aggregators such as EMODnet and GBIF. However, there are still some gaps in the data pipeline from data to policy mainly for the data citation and data providers acknowledgement. Despite significant data collection efforts and standardization initiatives, achieving consistent data quality remains challenging in citizen science due to diverse stakeholder requirements and varying accuracy levels across projects (Balázs et al, 2021; European Commission, 2021). However, several European-funded projects are currently working on data validation, accreditation and data provider recognition such as MINKE Project (Metrology for Integrated Marine Management and Knowledge-Transfer Network), ENFORCE (Empowering Citizen for Environmental Action), Guarden (safeGUARDing biodiversity and critical ecosystem services across sectors and scales) and Marine biodiversity monitoring harmonisation. Nevertheless, in order to achieve official recognition of citizen science, it is essential that international, European institutions and Member States facilitate its integration into monitoring programmes and environmental agreements within the regulatory framework. The research infrastructures could have the potential to facilitate data accreditation for end-users in terms of the data management processes. A showcase of best practices on how citizen science can shape environmental compliance supporting legislative requirements will be provided, focusing on both realised benefits and untapped potential.   

Reference

B Balázs, P Mooney, E Nováková, et al, 2021, Data Quality in Citizen Science Chapter 8 in K. Vohland et al. (eds.), The Science of Citizen Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_8

Danielsen, F, Ali, N, Andrianandrasan, H.T., et al, 2024. Involving citizens in monitoring the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Nat Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01447-y

European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Mitton, I., Tricarico, E., Schade, S., Lopez Canizares, C. et al., Data-validation solutions for citizen science data on invasive alien species, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/694386

Fraisl, D, Campbell, J, See, L, et al., 2020. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15(6): 1735–1751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7

Fraisl,D, See, L, Campbell, J, et al, 2023, The Contributions of Citizen Science to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and Other International Agreements and Frameworks Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 8 (1): 27. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.643

How to cite: Salvo, V. S., Soacha, K., Alvarez, A., and Piera, J.: Integrating citizen science data into European legislation: a critical examination of the pathway from data to policy., One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-668, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-668, 2025.

P762
|
OOS2025-710
Piero Lionello, Salpie Djoundourian, Maria Carmen Llasat, Mohamed Abdrabo, Murat Belivermis, Z Selmin Burak, Dario Camuffo, Nathalie Hilmi, José A. Jimenez, Suzan Kholeif, Stefano Moncado, Anna Pirani, Agustin Sanchez-Arcilla, Athanasios T. Vafeidis, Julie Gattacceca, Kasia Marini, and Joel Guiot

The Mediterranean Experts on Climate and Environmental Change — MedECC —is an independent scientific network focused on assessing available scientific knowledge on climate and environmental change and its associated risks in the Mediterranean basin. MedECC is a unique science-policy interface in the Mediterranean that aims to provides essential, region-specific information to stakeholders, governments, and citizens, enabling to make effective, informed decisions. In 2024, MedECC published the Special Report on Climate and environmental coastal risks in the Mediterranean basin, which assesses the scientific, technical and socio-economic literature on the multiple drivers of change affecting the Mediterranean (climate, pollution, biologic and socio-economic processes), their evolution, impacts on ecosystems and people, the risks that are posed and solutions to reduce them, together with pathways for sustainable development.

Climate change is already affecting both the terrestrial and marine components of the Mediterranean coastal zone. Projections show an increase in surface air temperatures, frequency and intensity of hot extremes, sea level, evapotranspiration and a decrease of precipitation, which, depending on the level of future greenhouse gas emissions will pose serious risks for ecosystems and important economic sectors (summer beach tourism, agriculture, aquaculture and fisheries). Along the Mediterranean coastlines, rising sea levels will exacerbate the risks of coastal floods, permanent inundation of some areas, and coastal erosion, with impacts on ecosystems and coastal structures, such as airports, transport networks, ports, and cultural heritage sites. Growing urbanisation will further increase the risk posed by flash floods in some coastal areas.

Risks of water scarcity in the coastal areas of the Mediterranean are expected to increase in the future. They are caused by the overall drying trend affecting the region, salinisation of coastal aquifers, increasing demand associated with population growth, irrigation, tourist use, industry and the energy sector. Adaptation options consist in increasing water supply, improving water quality, supporting measures and governance, and to a lesser extent, reducing water demand.

Recent past mass mortalities in coastal waters and the decline of coastal wetlands have been already partially attributed to marine heat waves and are expected to increase in the future. The efficiency of the conservation measures strongly depends on the success of climate change mitigation and an increasing number of hard limits will be reached for every increment of global warming.

In the Mediterranean coastal zone, present actions towards solutions to environmental problems, adaptation to climate change and its mitigation are insufficient to attain the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s) and transformative actions across all sectors, systems, and scales are required to meet the SDG’s will not be met. These requires the proper identification of vulnerabilities related to human activities and climate change impacts, and assessment of options to reduce risks to the affected communities and ecosystems. A mix of legal, policy and economic instruments, and behavioural nudges are available at local, national, and regional level to promote effective and resilient development pathways in the Mediterranean coastal zone. 

How to cite: Lionello, P., Djoundourian, S., Llasat, M. C., Abdrabo, M., Belivermis, M., Burak, Z. S., Camuffo, D., Hilmi, N., Jimenez, J. A., Kholeif, S., Moncado, S., Pirani, A., Sanchez-Arcilla, A., Vafeidis, A. T., Gattacceca, J., Marini, K., and Guiot, J.: A new assessment of climate and environmental coastal risks in the Mediterranean, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-710, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-710, 2025.

P763
|
OOS2025-903
|
ECOP
Jyotsna Chandrababu, Bhaskar Sinha, and Jigyasa Bisaria

Climate risks threaten the coastal areas all over the world. For a country like India, with a densely populated coastline, developing effective policies and management strategies to cope with the current and future climate risks is of vital importance. This paper examines the critical intersection of climate risks and coastal management in India, focusing on how inclusive science-policy-society interfaces can enhance actions supporting coastal climate resilience. Through a systematic literature review spanning three decades, it identifies the major climate risks affecting India's extensive coastline, which collectively pose significant threats to ecological and socio-economic stability. The paper further evaluates the current policies and frameworks on climate action and coastal management in India—such as the National and State Action Plan on Climate Change, Coastal Zone Management Notification and Disaster Management policies using the concept matrix approach to assess their effectiveness in addressing these emerging risks. The findings indicate a lack of comprehensive national policies specifically targeting coastal climate adaptation, with existing frameworks often subsuming coastal issues under broader categories. While the climate action plans of coastal states have components to address coastal vulnerabilities and adaptations, the lack of a national-level coastal adaptation policy is daunting. In addition, there has been a sustained dilution of conservation principles in the coastal zone management acts, as evidenced by the reduction in the no-development zones over the years. The paper carries out an in-depth policy analysis of the states and centres’ progress and preparedness in addressing the emerging coastal climate risks and emphasises a focus on a scientific understanding of the challenges and opportunities on the basis of which the policy and coastal management mechanisms have to be aligned. The disaster management policies and acts highlight the need for micro-level planning that integrates climate resilience into disaster management and coastal governance strategies, emphasizing the importance of fostering synergies among various sectors and institutions to enhance adaptive capacity and promote sustainable livelihoods for vulnerable coastal communities. The overall analysis of the national and state action plans, disaster management policies, and coastal regulation zone notifications in India shows that the integration of climate risk assessments into coastal adaptation planning is imperative for improving coastal resilience and sustainable development of coastal societies.

How to cite: Chandrababu, J., Sinha, B., and Bisaria, J.: Bridging the Science-Policy Gap for Coastal Resilience in India, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-903, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-903, 2025.

P764
|
OOS2025-970
|
Marco Boccia, Ji Sun Hwang, and Francois Bailet and the Marco Boccia

Life depends on the ocean, with societal health, cultural systems and national economies reliant on ocean processes and resources. To fully understand the current state of the ocean and the actions needed to address its many stressors, science must meet the needs of policy and decision makers by providing comprehensive multidisciplinary information and examples of implementable practices that support future sustainability. Information must also increase general awareness of the importance of a healthy ocean and effective management as keys to a viable future. The World Ocean Assessment (WOA) is the international mechanism for delivering robust knowledge and evidence to the governments of the world for ocean sustainability. 

 Based on the information provided, and lessons learned over three cycles, the WOA provides trends in the physical and chemical state of the ocean and major changes observed in marine organisms and habitats. Recognising the ocean as an interconnected socio-ecological system, the third WOA extends this knowledge to include social, economic and cultural aspects and identifies pathways for sustainability and associated best practices to 2024. 

By engaging in a process that is mandated by and delivers to the UN General Assembly, scientists have the opportunity to influence policy and decision-making. Through integrating input from multiple sectors and stakeholders via regional workshops, and via the involvement by 100’s of contributors, the WOA facilitates the introduction of innovations, multiple knowledge systems, new understanding and diversity of perspectives on a regular basis for consideration by the world’s countries. The WOA delivers information relevant to new international treaties being developed and for the incorporation of specific elements relating to the ocean into internationally set goals and targets. 

Through the evolution of the assessment over its three cycles we have identified three key elements that are needed to facilitate the transfer of scientific knowledge into decision-making.  

First, mechanisms implemented ensure that there are multiple points at which the governments and the scientific community of the world can contribute to both the scoping and drafting of the assessment. 

Second, the assessment provides an overall perspective at the global level, but importantly includes regional content that is relevant to governments in identifying needs at national scales. 

Third by identifying key knowledge gaps, the assessment provides guidance to the global community on where to focus efforts in the near future in order to implement management frameworks that enable use of the ocean in a more sustainable way.  

In this presentation, we further identify the work that still needs to be done in filling gaps to achieve a coordinated, comprehensive mechanism for connecting science with decision-making and action for ensuring future sustainability of the ocean.   

How to cite: Boccia, M., Hwang, J. S., and Bailet, F. and the Marco Boccia: Delivering scientific evidence to address the needs of policy, decision making and society: the role of the World Ocean Assessment, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-970, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-970, 2025.

P765
|
OOS2025-996
Elisabetta Bonotto, Kirsten Isensee, and Valentina Lovat

Coastal blue carbon ecosystems – mangroves, seagrasses and tidal marshes – are the most efficient natural carbon sinks on Earth on a per area basis, which makes them a key component of nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation. These ecosystems provide a wide range of additional benefits, contributing to climate change adaptation, biodiversity, ocean economies and livelihoods of coastal communities.

In line with its mission to promote international cooperation in ocean science to improve management of the ocean, coasts and marine resources, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO has supported scientific efforts aimed at increasing knowledge of the potential of coastal blue carbon ecosystems for climate change mitigation and adaptation for over a decade. Since 2010, the IOC has co-sponsored the Blue Carbon Initiative together with Conservation International and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

As the scientific understanding was increasing and the policy request for guidance on blue carbon action increased, IOC joined Australia as one of the founding Partners of the International Partnership for Blue Carbon (IPBC) in 2015,  and since 2020 is sharing the Coordinator role with the Australian Government. The aim of the Partnership is to provide an open forum for governments (currently 18) to connect with experts and practitioners in the field of blue carbon, including the BCI, allowing for an open dialogue between science and policy with the aim to strengthen global action towards the protection of these ecosystems. Building on the collaboration initiated within the IPBC, a group of countries following the leadership of France have formed a High-Level Ambition Group on blue carbon (HILAG), which aims at enhancing commitments to better integrate blue carbon efforts in the ocean-climate-biodiversity nexus at the highest political level and to develop innovative public-private finance approaches to accelerate blue carbon project development and showcase best practices.

The United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030, the Ocean Decade) has recently provided an additional opportunity for blue carbon scientists and experts from across the world to come together under the common framework of the Global Ocean Decade Programme for Blue Carbon (GO-BC), where IOC, the BCI and the IPBC are all partners to ensure blue carbon efforts are streamlined globally, while enhancing the scientific capacity worldwide implemented at the regional level. In line with the objectives of the Ocean Decade’s Challenge 10 "Restore society's relationship with the ocean", the IOC has also engaged local communities in ocean literacy and citizen science initiatives to empower them in becoming ocean stewards. Through strategic collaboration with local institutions, partners, and experts as part of the Save the Wave project, these efforts aim to strengthen society’s connection to the ocean, complementing the other initiatives at the science-policy interface.

How to cite: Bonotto, E., Isensee, K., and Lovat, V.: The role of the UN in promoting science-policy-society dialogue to accelerate the protection of coastal blue carbon ecosystems globally, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-996, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-996, 2025.

P766
|
OOS2025-1013
|
ECOP
Kelli Johnson, Joanna Staneva, Emma Reyes, Joaquin Tintore, Antonio Bonaduce, Giorgia Verri, Ivan Federico, Pavel Terskii, Alena Bartosova, Kai Christensen, Quentin Jamet, Angelique Melet, Lorinc Meszaros, Ghada El Serafy, Vassiliki Kourafalou, Pierre De Mey-Frémaux, Alexander Kurapov, and Wei Chen

The Horizon Europe FOCCUS project (Forecasting and Observing the Open-to-Coastal Ocean for Copernicus Users, foccus-project.eu), is enhancing the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) for coastal zones. In collaboration with European Member State Coastal Systems (MSCS) and users, FOCCUS aims to improve and advance the coastal dimension of CMEMS by enhancing existing capability, developing innovative coastal products focusing on three key pillars: i) improving new coastal observations by fusing high-resolution remote sensing and in-situ data and implementing new technologies and approaches, including the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods to improve accuracy; ii) developing advanced hydrology and coastal models including a pan-European hydrological ensemble for improved river discharge predictions, and establishing a unified coastal system by testing new methodologies in MSCS production chains while taking advantage of stochastic simulation, ensemble approaches, and AI technology; and iii) demonstrating innovative products and improved co-produced services that address both Environmental and Societal Challenges, enhancing the performance and societal relevance of coastal ocean forecasting systems in and downstream of CMEMS. As an endorsed action under the UN Ocean Decade’s CoastPredict program, FOCCUS aligns its efforts with international initiatives, fostering collaboration to address the complex challenges of coastal regions worldwide. FOCCUS collaborates with relevant international initiatives, such as the COSS-TT (Coastal Ocean and Shelf Seas Task Team under OceanPredict) and UN Decade programmes (such as CoastPredict, DITTO, and the Decadal Collaborative Center on Coastal Resilience (DCC-CR)). The project emphasizes co-production and collaboration with end-users, policy-makers, and local communities. Through stakeholder engagement and the development of new science-policy interfaces, FOCCUS enhances the societal relevance of coastal forecasting systems, supporting decision-making processes for sustainable coastal management and climate adaptation strategies. Ultimately, FOCCUS provides high-quality, trusted marine knowledge needed for evidence-based management, supporting a sustainable blue economy, and building climate resilience for European and global communities. The consortium consists of 19 partners from 11 countries bringing together a diverse range of expertise in oceanography, observational science, advanced modeling, and technology development, exemplifying the power of international collaboration in advancing ocean sciences and technologies.

FOCCUS is funded by the European Union (Grant Agreement No. 101133911). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

How to cite: Johnson, K., Staneva, J., Reyes, E., Tintore, J., Bonaduce, A., Verri, G., Federico, I., Terskii, P., Bartosova, A., Christensen, K., Jamet, Q., Melet, A., Meszaros, L., El Serafy, G., Kourafalou, V., De Mey-Frémaux, P., Kurapov, A., and Chen, W.: FOCCUS: supporting ocean action with improvements to European coastal monitoring and forecasting, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1013, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1013, 2025.

P767
|
OOS2025-1279
Coline Léandre, Nathalie Morata, Adèle Fardoux, Julie Hammer-Monart, Marie-Hélène Schwoob, Françoise Gaill, Tanya Brodie Rudolph, Frédérique Chlous, Victoire Provost, and Maxime De Lisle

Biodiversity loss and climate change: the two major environmental challenges of our time. To help address these challenges, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and the IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) were created, with a mandate to strengthen the science-policy interface on climate and biodiversity, helping ensure these issues are better considered in public and private decision-making. Biodiversity loss and climate change are inextricably linked. This interdependence, which may have been overlooked in the past, has now been established in scientific and, increasingly, political circles. 

The ocean is at the crossroads of climate change and biodiversity loss. IPCC and IPBES assessments have demonstrated the impact of climate change on oceans, leading to a decrease in marine biodiversity. However, the biodiversity-climate-ocean nexus remains underexplored. These assessments have highlighted key solutions, such as marine spatial planning, the establishment of marine protected areas, and the adoption of ecosystem-based approaches to fisheries management. For these solutions to be effective and inclusive, close collaboration between scientists, policymakers, and civil society stakeholders is essential. 

In this context, an event was organized in September 2024 by the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB), in partnership with the national IPBES and IPCC focal points and Towards IPOS (International Panel for Ocean Sustainability). This event brought together French IPBES and IPCC communities to focus on ocean issues, facilitating a deeper understanding of biodiversity-climate links and initiating discussions around the upcoming ocean science conference’s priorities. The exchanges focused on integrating diverse knowledge systems (scientific, Indigenous, and local) to create a more inclusive and equitable approach to ocean management. Discussions explored how ocean-based climate solutions can align with both mitigation and adaptation goals, advocating for solutions that consider social equity alongside environmental outcomes. This event therefore highlighted the critical role of collaborative, dynamic science in shaping policies that protect marine ecosystems while upholding the rights and wellbeing of human communities. Achieving sustainable ocean governance will depend on inclusive, transformative actions that work across scales, bridging local and global priorities. 

How to cite: Léandre, C., Morata, N., Fardoux, A., Hammer-Monart, J., Schwoob, M.-H., Gaill, F., Brodie Rudolph, T., Chlous, F., Provost, V., and De Lisle, M.: Climate-Biodiversity Nexus: Scientific and Policy Perspectives on Ocean Conservation, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1279, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1279, 2025.

P768
|
OOS2025-1290
|
ECOP
Deutz Régis Zafimamatrapehy, Stephano Duolah Fanambinantsoa, Nicolas Jaosedy, Daniel Raberinary, Christian Chaboud, Thierry Razanakoto, Jamal Mahafina, Olivier Thébaud, Tony Charles, and Marc Léopold

Small-scale fisheries are critical to food security, livelihoods, and employment for millions of people globally. However, their management faces significant challenges due to complex socio-ecological dynamics, limited long-term data availability, and ineffective governance, particularly in developing countries. This study presents findings from an ongoing action research initiative aimed at informing decision-making in small-scale fisheries in Madagascar. The approach has combined participatory monitoring of the fisheries with stakeholder engagement processes since 2017. A collaborative online fisheries information system was developed to aggregate data and visualize key bioeconomic fishery indicators that revealed stock decline. Regional and national stakeholder platforms were established and addressed critical management issues, particularly the harvesting and marketing of juvenile crabs. They recommended improving gear selectivity to protect juvenile crabs, among other actions. A participatory fishing experiment was then designed and demonstrated that increasing gear mesh size would effectively decrease undersized catch. A bioeconomic model was further developed using a participatory framework and showed that this rule would positively impact both resource biomass and fishers’ income compared to the status quo. This harvest strategy was validated through a national workshop in 2022 with government support. Consequently two ongoing collaborative projects were launched in 2024 to evaluate the social and economic acceptability of this transformation in real-world conditions. Overall this case study demonstrates that the research initiative has structured interactions between scientists, stakeholders, and government at multiple scales, which has built trust and social learning created incentives for collective action. How such science-society-policy interactions may be institutionalized is under discussion. The findings provide a promising proof of concept for generalizing the approach to other resource use contexts in the South and the North to effectively address the complex challenges of small-scale fisheries and marine coastal biodiversity sustainability.

How to cite: Zafimamatrapehy, D. R., Fanambinantsoa, S. D., Jaosedy, N., Raberinary, D., Chaboud, C., Razanakoto, T., Mahafina, J., Thébaud, O., Charles, T., and Léopold, M.: Mobilizing participatory science for inclusive governance of small-scale fisheries in developing countries, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1290, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1290, 2025.

P769
|
OOS2025-1308
|
ECOP
Assessing Factors and Processes for Effective Co-Development and Transfer of Inter- and Transdisciplinary Knowledge for Mitigating Marine Biological Hazards
(withdrawn)
Christina Hörterer, Lena Rölfer, Martin Engler, and Gesche Krause
P770
|
OOS2025-1313
Jen McRuer, Diz Glithero, and Natalie Hart

The United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (hereafter, “Ocean Decade”) provides a collaborative framework and critical opportunity for the global community to rally behind a core mission–transformative ocean science solutions for sustainable development, connecting people and the ocean. Launched in 2023 and led by IOC-UNESCO and 10 Working Groups of diverse experts across geographies, cultures, generations, and genders, the Vision 2030 process identified key recommendations and priority activities with tangible measures of success for each of the 10 Ocean Decade Challenges. As part of a set of White Papers, the Challenge 10 White Paper, Restoring Society’s Relationship with the Ocean, identified four key drivers to achieve this aim. The drivers include: 1) multiple knowledge systems; 2) communications; 3) education; and 4) cultural connections. The Challenge 10 White Paper, more broadly, positions ocean literacy as a societal outcome, indicative of greater understanding, value, and care for the ocean across all sectors of society. Achieving this ambition requires not only intentional, but informed and actionable collaboration among all ocean stakeholders. Importantly, this collective effort must be guided by science-policy-society linkages that directly inform, motivate, and enable the deepening of human-ocean relationships and pro-ocean behaviour to help close the knowledge-action gap. Understanding public perceptions, attitudes, knowledge, and values that connect us with (or disconnect us from) the ocean, including coastal and freshwater environments, can help to ground collective efforts in public resonance and societal relevance, informing direction and impact over time. Aligned with Theme 10: Vibrant science to inform and support ocean action, this session discusses the role of Public Ocean Perceptions Research (POPR)—a form of ocean literacy research—as a means to a) capture societal sentiments to provide baseline data across geographies, cultures, and sectors; b) illustrate how many POPR studies may unintentionally/unknowingly engage themes and dimensions of ocean literacy; and c) track changes in perceptions over time to assess the barriers, motivators, and enablers that impact the behavioural intentions needed to galvanize pro-ocean action. Importantly, we provide an overview of a substantive POPR global collaboration- the Ocean & Society Survey, sharing the design methodology and preliminary findings from the first 15 countries. Moreover, we will illustrate the value of evidence-based insights for shaping strategic communications and policy-making; for example by: a) identifying key levers and obstacles to ocean connection in order to inform communication approach; b) deepening audience understanding and enable audience segmentation; and c) contributing to measurement of campaign (and wider ocean literacy) impact. There is already an appetite for such data. A communications symposium held as an official satellite event of the Ocean Decade Conference in Barcelona 2024 (as part of the Advancing Strategic Ocean Communication project, with 500+ global communicators) identified a collaborative research base as one of the key requirements to develop more impactful communications that ultimately mobilize public engagement toward an ocean-connected society. 

How to cite: McRuer, J., Glithero, D., and Hart, N.: Transdisciplinary Collaboration on Public Ocean Perception Research: Engaging Society to Inform Communication Campaigns and Policy, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1313, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1313, 2025.

P771
|
OOS2025-1320
Deniz Karaca Halén, Artur Palacz, Joana Soares, Dominik Krzymiński, Nina Lepola, and Lina Mtwana Nordlund

To effectively address the challenges of biodiversity loss and the compounded impacts of various anthropogenic stressors, including climate change and ecosystem disturbances, a coordinated and systematic approach to ocean observation and policy alignment is essential. The current fragmented landscape of observation efforts hinders collective progress in advancing scientific understanding and responding to critical ecosystem tipping points.

To bridge these gaps, we are co-designing a comprehensive strategy that integrates policy recommendations with the development of standardized guidelines and regulations aimed at harmonizing and strengthening global and regional observation networks. This strategy focuses on enhancing evidence-based decision-making by fostering the co-creation and demonstration of operational, interconnected workflows. These workflows will cover the entire spectrum from observation system assessment and design to policy application, ensuring that collected data is robust, accessible, and directly applicable to management and governance frameworks in alignment with FAIR data principles.

Central to this vision is the co-creation of a comprehensive, fit-for-purpose, and inclusive Blueprint for Integrated Ocean Science (BIOS). This blueprint promotes a holistic approach and encourages effective communication and collaboration among stakeholders and sectors, enabling interoperability across systems. The production of white papers and policy recommendations will bolster European leadership in the ocean-climate-biodiversity nexus.

The EU-funded Co-Creating Transformative Pathways to Biological and Ecosystem Ocean Observations (BioEcoOcean) project leverage collaborative networks to promote best practices aligned with EU directives, such as the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), focusing on enhanced ocean observation, data curation, and standardization. A Community of Practice Forum (CoPF) will coordinate multi-disciplinary ocean observing efforts, engaging researchers, NGOs, industries and authorities. This co-creative approach bridges scientific research with practical application, fostering evidence-based policymaking and sustainable solutions. By integrating regional knowledge and promoting cross-sectoral partnerships, it enhances ecosystem services, socio-economic resilience, and long-term human well-being through impactful, science-based policies and sustainable environmental stewardship.

 

How to cite: Karaca Halén, D., Palacz, A., Soares, J., Krzymiński, D., Lepola, N., and Mtwana Nordlund, L.: Blueprint for Integrated Ocean Science (BIOS): Advancing Harmonized Observation Systems and Policy Coordination for Sustainable Ecosystem Management, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1320, 2025.

P772
|
OOS2025-1389
Building a Coalition and National Strategy to Advance Ocean Literacy in Canada–Lessons Learned, Adaptations, and Next Steps
(withdrawn)
Diz Glithero and Jen McRuer
P773
|
OOS2025-1458
|
ECOP
Niccolo Bassan

The proposal for a United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ocean Decade) in 2016 emerged to elevate ocean science’ presence in global policy, promoting the ocean’s essential role in achieving all SDGs, such as those related to climate, biodiversity, and food security. With its vision of “the science we need for the ocean we want,” the Ocean Decade has since established an agile framework to promote and prioritize inclusivity, equity, and diversity to advance transdisciplinary and collaborative ocean science.

Launched in 2021 and now the largest global ocean science initiative, the Ocean Decade has catalyzed over 50 international programs, 400 national and regional projects, and fostered collaboration among over 4,500 institutions and 20,000 individuals. One of the Decade’s commitments is to co-design and co-produce actions empowering diverse actors, including scientists, Indigenous communities, policymakers, industry, and civil society, to shape and implement actions jointly. By actively involving all relevant stakeholders, the Ocean Decade builds science that is both locally and globally applicable, fostering a science-policy-society interface rooted in shared goals and needs.

Most Decade Actions aim at advancing transdisciplinary knowledge exchange, enhancing the global ocean community’s ability to address complex issues like climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss. To achieve this co-design and co-production are essential elements since they integrate local perspectives into global conservation and policy frameworks, making ocean science not only accessible but also actionable and sustainable. By fostering partnerships among different actors, co-design and co-production bring diverse knowledge systems into ocean science, ensuring solutions are scientifically robust and culturally relevant and that the stakeholders’ needs are met by actively involving them in the design and implementation processes.

To facilitate and support these bottom-up collaborations, the Ocean Decade developed several frameworks for capacity development, knowledge exchange and digital engagement across different disciplines and geographies, strengthening the science-policy-society interface and enhancing the relevance of ocean science in sustainable development.

Several co-designed and co-produced Decade Actions support community-driven, inclusive solutions to global and local ocean challenges. These Actions represent a model to be followed for a shift toward ocean science that is actionable, accessible, and culturally sensitive, promoting equitable ocean stewardship at a global, regional and local scale.

How to cite: Bassan, N.: Co-design and co-production in the Ocean Decade, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1458, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1458, 2025.

P774
|
OOS2025-1503
Esméralda Longépée, Cristele Chevalier, Pascale Chabanet, Lionel Bigot, Claire Gollety, Flore Moreau, Damien Devault, Catherine Villaret, and Mathieu Leborgne

The island of Mayotte has been experiencing water shortages for a number of years; the two hill reserves, as well as local boreholes and the only desalination plant on the island, are no longer sufficient to supply the population, particularly during droughts such as the one in 2023. Repeated water cuts and more or less scheduled water turns, coupled with the day-to-day living conditions of a large proportion of the population (including illegal immigrants), are now part of the destabilising factors on the island. Faced with what is proving to be an increasingly structural challenge to living conditions on the island of Mayotte, and in the wake of the drought following the 2023 rainy season, the government has issued a prefectoral decree, known as a ‘civil emergency’, to speed up the project to build a second desalination plant. Behind this political decision, taken under social pressure from a thirsty population, there are different relationships to temporality in the management of public affairs: the short, or even very short, timeframe of the civil emergency; the long, or even very long, timeframe of the construction and ecological dynamics of lagoon environments; and finally, the timeframe of science and the construction of its knowledge on an issue where the necessary multidisciplinary expertise comes up against the emergency context and the difficulty of sharing its conclusions with the general public. The way in which the project has unfolded over the months illustrates this.

How to cite: Longépée, E., Chevalier, C., Chabanet, P., Bigot, L., Gollety, C., Moreau, F., Devault, D., Villaret, C., and Leborgne, M.: The desalination plant project in Mayotte: an ideal-typical example of the confrontation of political, scientific and environmental temporalities, specific to climate change and its effects., One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1503, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1503, 2025.