Under climate change, semi-arid Mediterranean regions such as the Quípar basin (SE Spain) are increasingly exposed to the combined risks of floods and droughts, further exacerbated by land-use changes. Addressing these interconnected hydroclimatic extremes requires integrated, catchment-scale strategies that combine biophysical effectiveness with social acceptability. This study presents a participatory co-design process to develop contrasting climate adaptation scenarios in the Quípar basin, combining Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and grey infrastructure. The ultimate aim is to enhance stakeholder understanding of local and regional impacts and support the selection of effective adaptation pathways.
Through semi-structured interviews, 35 stakeholders from key sectors (farmers, policymakers, NGOs, researchers, and local communities) were engaged to identify flood and drought hotspots, perceived drivers of hydroclimatic risk, and existing and potential adaptation measures. Stakeholders also assessed their preferences, spatial suitability, and key barriers to implementation. In total, 54 land-based measures were identified, including 34 NbS and 20 grey infrastructure measures (21 addressing both floods and droughts, 9 targeting floods only, and 4 droughts only). The most widely supported measures included ground cover practices, reforestation, and terracing. The main flood hotspot was consistently located in the middle reach of the Quípar River, while drought risk was perceived as affecting the entire catchment. Key perceived drivers of increasing hydroclimatic risk included climate change, land-use change, and shifts in agricultural practices, while major perceived barriers to implementation were limited social awareness, economic constraints, and bureaucratic complexity.
Building on these results, two co-design workshops (n = 35) were conducted to develop three contrasting adaptation scenarios based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs): (i) an NbS-oriented scenario (SSP1), (ii) a business-as-usual scenario combining NbS and grey infrastructure (SSP2), and (iii) a technology-driven scenario focused on grey infrastructure (SSP5). Participants collaboratively prioritised and spatially allocated adaptation measures, fostering integrated spatial thinking, social learning, and awareness of synergies and trade-offs.
Although the three scenarios differ in their chosen measures, several functions overlap: all address flood-prone areas through targeted interventions; river and floodplain restoration in the NbS scenario, channelisation in the technological scenario, and vegetation clearance in the business-as-usual scenario. Upstream water retention is promoted through ponds and landscape features in the NbS scenario, and through check dams in the technological and business-as-usual scenarios. Similarly, aquifer recharge is enhanced through wetlands in the NbS scenario and through managed infiltration in the technological scenario.The scenarios also diverge: the NbS scenario prioritises reducing water demand and restoring vegetation (reforestation, cover crops, pastoralism), the technological scenario focuses on increasing water supply through infrastructure (reservoirs, water transfers, desalination, wastewater reuse, expanded drip irrigation), while the business-as-usual scenario occupies an intermediate position, with practices such as grazing, drought-tolerant crops, and swales without substantially reducing irrigation or enhancing vegetation cover.
In a next phase, the impacts of these scenarios will be quantified using hydrological modelling to assess their performance under current and future climate conditions. Model results will be shared and discussed with the stakeholder groups to further support integrated spatial planning for effective climate adaptation.