- 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (linda.laikre@popgen.su.se)
- *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract
Genetic diversity underpins all biodiversity but has long been overlooked in policy and practice. A major step was taken at COP15 of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, where Goal A, Target 4, and dedicated indicators for genetic diversity were adopted. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework explicitly states that sufficient genetic diversity must be maintained to secure the adaptive potential of populations within species, both wild and domesticated. Its monitoring framework includes headline indicator A.4: the proportion of populations within species with an effective population size Ne > 500 (Ne500) and complementary indicator A.CY.22, the proportion of populations maintained (PM). Parties are expected to report on these indicators from 2026. Our project supports European countries in initiating assessments and preparing for reporting. Within the EU COST Action GENOA and linked to the Biodiversa+ project GINAMO, we build on previous work (Mastretta-Yanes & da Silva et al., 2024) that assessed Ne500 and PM in nine countries, including Belgium, France, and Sweden. We now present improved assessment tools and results from over twelve additional European countries, covering continental Europe, Fennoscandia, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. A key challenge addressed here is assessing species with transboundary distributions and reporting indicator values at the EU level. We also describe collaborative interactions with CBD National Focal Points in the focal countries. Our results reveal substantial variation in uptake of genetic monitoring approaches across Europe. Based on this, we propose a roadmap to improve assessment and reporting of genetic diversity indicators at both national and EU scales. We also discuss extending these approaches to domesticated species, with examples from Belgium and Sweden. Take-home contributions include: 1) Demonstrating a practical pan-European approach to GBF genetic diversity indicator implementation; 2) Providing a replicable methodology and assessment tools ready for national reporting in 2026; 3) Highlighting challenges and proposing solutions for transboundary populations and EU-level reporting, facilitating harmonised reporting across countries; 4) Offering a roadmap to integrate domesticated species in national genetic diversity reporting, extending GBF applicability.
Viktoria Köppä 1) Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (Viktoria.koppa@zoologi.su.se) Joachim Mergeay, 2) Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium (joachim.mergeay@inbo.be) Alicia Mastretta-Yanes 3) Kew Royal Botanic Gardens, UK, (A.MastrettaYanes@kew.org) Tsipe Aavik, 4) Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia (tsipe.aavik@ut.ee) Filippos Aravanopoulos 5) School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece (aravanop@auth.gr) Elena Buzan, 6) Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia (elena.buzan@upr.si) Vlatka Cubric-Curik, 7) University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia, (vcubric@agr.hr) Maria Kachamakova, 8) Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria (maria.n.kachamakova@gmail.com) Colin Kelleher, 9) DBN Herbarium and Plant Molecular Laboratory, National Botanic Gardens of Ireland, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland (colin.kelleher@opw.ie) Peter Kling 10) Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 01, Zvolen, Slovakia (peter.klinga@gmail.com) Maciej K. Konopiński, 11) Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland (konopinski@iop.krakow.pl) Alexander Kopatz, 12) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway (alexander.kopatz@nina.no) Caroline Mouton, 2) Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium (caroline.mouton@inbo.be) David O´Brien, 13) NatureScot, Inverness, UK Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (David.OBrien@nature.scot) Joost Raeymaekers, 14) Nord University, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Bodø, Norway (joost.raeymaekers@nord.no) Emina Šunje, 15) Evolutionary Ecology Group, Faculty of Science, University of Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina (sunje.emina@gmail.com) Philippine Vergeer 16) Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (philippine.vergeer@wur.nl) Marta Vila, 17) Faculty of Sciences, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain (mvila@udc.es) Isa-Rita Russo, 18) School of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom (RussoIM@cardiff.ac.uk) Ancuta Fedorca 19)National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry Marin Dracea, Brasov, Romania (ancutacotovelea@yahoo.com) GENOA COST Action https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA23121/
How to cite: Laikre, L. and the 20 coauthors: Implementing the indicators for genetic diversity of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework across Europe, World Biodiversity Forum 2026, Davos, Switzerland, 14–19 Jun 2026, WBF2026-667, https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-667, 2026.