Have we misunderstood the Shields curve?
- 1Texas A&M University, Ocean Engineering, College Station, United States of America (oduranvinent@tamu.edu)
- 2Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Ocean College, Zhejiang University, 310058 Hangzhou, China (tpaehtz@gmail.com)
The Shields curve, which compiles measurements of fluvial sediment transport thresholds in terms of the nondimensionalized threshold fluid shear stress and shear Reynolds number, is a standard reference in geophysics and hydraulic and coastal engineering and commonly thought to describe the critical flow conditions that are required for flow-driven entrainment of bed sediment. However, recent findings from several independent research groups have challenged this belief on various grounds: (i) particle-bed impacts predominately trigger sediment entrainment [1]; (ii) such impact-triggered entrainment can sustain continuous transport even when flow-driven entrainment events are (almost) completely absent [2, 3, (4)]; and (iii) extrapolating measurements of the transport rate of such impact-sustained continuous transport to zero yields transport thresholds that still fall on the Shields curve [5]. The question that thus emerges from these findings is, if not flow-driven entrainment, then what is the physics behind the thresholds shown in the Shields curve? We will try to give an answer to this question based on our latest research.
[1] Vowinckel et al., Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00221686.2016.1140683
[2] Pähtz & Duran, Physical Review Fluids, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.074303
[3] Lee & Jerolmack, Earth Surface Dynamics, doi: 10.5194/esurf-6-1089-2018
[4] Heyman et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2016, doi: 10.1002/2015JF003672
How to cite: Duran Vinent, O. and Pähtz, T.: Have we misunderstood the Shields curve?, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-2218, 2020