EGU25-12467, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12467
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 01 May, 15:15–15:25 (CEST)
 
Room 2.24
Using paleoclimatic range reconstructions to analyse historical space shifts of Striped and Brown Hyenas
Francisca Virtuoso1, Lizzy Brouwer1, Frank van Langevelde1, Stephanie Dloniak2, Anouschka Hof1, Andrew Jacobson3, Jente Ottenburghs1, Florian Weise4, Lars Werdelin5, Michael Westbury6, and Femke Broekhuis1
Francisca Virtuoso et al.
  • 1Wageningen, Wildlife Ecology & Conservation, Netherlands (francisca.virtuoso@wur.nl)
  • 2Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824 USA
  • 3Department of Environment and Sustainability, Catawba College, Salisbury, NC, 28144 USA
  • 4Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
  • 5Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 6Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Niche theory suggests that two species with similar ecological roles can coexist only if they exhibit sufficient differentiation in resource use; otherwise, competitive exclusion may occur. The striped and brown hyena share similar niches, particularly in terms of diet and habitat preferences. Today, the brown hyena’s range is restricted to Southern Africa, while the striped hyena occupies a larger area from Kenya to India. Yet, fossil evidence suggests that these species could have occupied wider, potentially overlapping ranges historically. Brown hyena fossils have been found in Kenya and Ethiopia, while striped hyena fossils appear as far south as South Africa. To investigate the potential historical range shifts of both species during the last 120,000 years, we developed maximum entropy species distribution models (package megaSDM). We used occurrence data collated by the IUCN SSC Hyena Specialist group and HadCM3/ HadAM3H simulated climatic, bioclimatic and vegetation variables as  predictors. Our results indicate that during the Last Glacial Maximum (~21,000BP), a potential corridor with high habitat suitability existed between their current ranges, suggesting that the striped hyena could have extended its range into southern Africa, supporting previous fossil findings. We found that habitat suitability for both species has declined over time, likely driven by changes in precipitation, temperature, and biome type. Both species show a preference for regions with relatively low annual precipitation (with 700 mm as a maximum threshold), moderate temperatures (12–18°C), and arid landscapes. These results imply that fluctuating Pleistocene climates, particularly cycles of wetter and drier conditions in East Africa, likely caused shifts in suitable habitats, contributing to the contraction of both species' ranges. Understanding these historical dynamics provides insights into the ecological and climatic factors that have shaped the current distributions of striped and brown hyenas, with implications for conservation and management in the context of future climate change.

How to cite: Virtuoso, F., Brouwer, L., van Langevelde, F., Dloniak, S., Hof, A., Jacobson, A., Ottenburghs, J., Weise, F., Werdelin, L., Westbury, M., and Broekhuis, F.: Using paleoclimatic range reconstructions to analyse historical space shifts of Striped and Brown Hyenas, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-12467, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12467, 2025.