EGU25-12907, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12907
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 02 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Friday, 02 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.117
Public perception on surface water-related ecosystem services in Romania
Gabriela Ioana-Toroimac1, Liliana Zaharia1, Dana Maria Constantin (Oprea)1, Tsaralaza Jorlin Tsiavahananahary2, and Dănuța Alessandra Mihalcea1
Gabriela Ioana-Toroimac et al.
  • 1University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Bucharest, Romania
  • 2Association Internationale de Climatologie, Madagascar

The general aim of the study is to analyse the public perception on the ecosystem services related to surface water (rivers and lakes). A specific objective was to assess the level of knowledge of the population on hydroclimatic phenomena and related services. The study is based on a survey including 22 examples of surface water-related ecosystem services that were listed in a questionnaire grouped in three major types: provisioning services (6), cultural services (9), and regulating and supporting services (7).  A total of 254 local residents living river or lake side were interviewed face-to-face in Southern and Eastern Romania, in both urban and rural communities. The residents had to choose from the list those ecosystems services characterizing the neighbouring surface water. The answers showed that 20% of these local residents considered ecosystem services such as climate regulation (temperature, noise), air quality regulation (carbon sequestration) or flood risk control as being characteristic for their nearby environment. Among regulating and supporting services, the role of surface water on the biodiversity production and habitat appears to be more obvious (with up to 60% of answers) than local climate related effects. Moreover, regulating and supporting services were pinpointed by a lower number of residents when compared to provisioning services or even cultural services, respectively 40%, 61% and 51%. We concluded on a poor knowledge on hydroclimatic phenomena/processes and the ecosystem services they provide that should be countered by education based on scientific proofs, but also science popularisation.

How to cite: Ioana-Toroimac, G., Zaharia, L., Constantin (Oprea), D. M., Tsiavahananahary, T. J., and Mihalcea, D. A.: Public perception on surface water-related ecosystem services in Romania, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-12907, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12907, 2025.