EGU25-13493, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13493
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 29 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 29 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X1, X1.122
Adapting Controlled-Source Seismic Techniques for Earthquake Reflection Imaging in Complex Environments: Insights from Krafla Volcano, NE Iceland
Regina Maaß1, Ka Lok Li1, Christopher J. Bean1, Benjamin Schwarz2, and Ivan Lokmer3
Regina Maaß et al.
  • 1Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin, Ireland (regina_maass@outlook.de)
  • 2Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems IWES, Bremen, Germany
  • 3School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Volcanoes generate complex seismic wavefields due to their heterogeneous geological structure, making it challenging to obtain accurate reflection images of their interiors. However, understanding the internal structure and dynamics of volcanoes is essential for enhancing monitoring capabilities and improving eruption forecasting. In this study, we apply controlled-source seismic techniques to passive reflection imaging at Krafla volcano, NE Iceland. Krafla is globally recognised as one of the few sites where magma was directly encountered during drilling at the IDDP-1 borehole at a depth of 2.1 km. Using the known magma location as a reference, we employ common-depth-point binning and stacking for preconditioned seismic data from over 300 earthquakes recorded by more than 100 short-period (5 Hz) seismic nodes. At first, we computed theoretical arrival times for various P- and S-wave reflections, including both primary and multiple reflections, using a ray-tracing algorithm and local 1D velocity models. The computational domain was discretized between the surface and a depth of 6 km, using a grid of 80x80x20 m cells. For each grid cell, common-depth-point gathers were generated, and amplitudes were stacked along the reflection trajectories. We further use synthetic waveforms to systematically evaluate the challenges and limitations of this approach in our study area. We observe that the specific distribution of earthquakes and stations causes direct waves (e.g., P- and S-waves) to constructively interfere, creating  spurious reflectors in the imaging results. To mitigate this effect, we exclude time windows corresponding to the arrival of direct waves. We also investigate the effect of various waveform attributes—such as absolute amplitudes, envelopes, and their derivatives—on the stacking process and the final imaging results. Preliminary results indicate that the second derivative of seismic trace envelopes might be particularly useful in complex environments characterized by a high degree of incoherent scattering and diverse earthquake source mechanisms. This approach has successfully revealed several discontinuities at shallow depths, offering new insights into the local structure of the Krafla geothermal system.

How to cite: Maaß, R., Li, K. L., Bean, C. J., Schwarz, B., and Lokmer, I.: Adapting Controlled-Source Seismic Techniques for Earthquake Reflection Imaging in Complex Environments: Insights from Krafla Volcano, NE Iceland, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-13493, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13493, 2025.