EGU25-17014, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-17014
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 09:25–09:35 (CEST)
 
Room L1
Spatiotemporal dynamics and controls of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural ditches
Khadija Aziz1, Joachim Audet2, Hannah Conroy3, Pia Geranmayeh1, Katarina Kyllmar4, Michael Peacock1,5, Sebastian Sobek6, and Marcus Wallin1
Khadija Aziz et al.
  • 1Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (khadija.aziz@slu.se)
  • 2Department of Ecoscience - Catchment Science and Environmental Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (joau@ecos.au.dk )
  • 3University of Washington, Seattle, USA (hconroy@uw.edu)
  • 4Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (Katarina.Kyllmar@slu.se )
  • 5Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • 6Department of Ecology and Genetics; Limnology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (sebastian.sobek@ebc.uu.se)

Agricultural ditches have been identified as emission hotspots of the three main atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs) i.e., carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). However, due to lack of representative GHG emission data from these small waterbodies, their contribution to the total GHG emissions from the agricultural sector are reported as highly uncertain. In this study the aim was to 1) quantify the magnitude of GHG emissions and understand their spatiotemporal dynamics in agricultural ditches, and 2) identify gas specific controls that regulate those dynamics.

In our two-year field study, dissolved concentrations and fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O were measured in ditches, as well as concentrations in groundwater, of a clay soil dominated agricultural catchment located in central Sweden. Sampling was carried out biweekly during the growing season (April–November). Additional sampling for water chemistry and runoff was made to aid assessment of GHG controls. Local floating chamber-based GHG fluxes were further scaled for the entire ditch network for representative catchment scale emission estimates.

The results showed that both dissolved GHG concentrations and their respective fluxes were highly variable in space and time. In general, higher GHG concentrations and fluxes were observed during the summer and after rain events, but patterns were gas and site-specific. Across all sites, N2O concentrations were positively related to dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), and CO2 to total organic carbon (TOC), whereas patterns for CH4 were more unpredictable. Groundwater data also revealed highly variable gas-specific patterns over time. While groundwater N2O concentrations was on average close to concentrations observed in the ditch, CO2 was 5-fold and CH4 1000-fold higher in groundwater indicating a gas-variable terrestrial source contribution to observed ditch emissions. Our study identified ditches as significant but also highly variable sources of CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions to the atmosphere. This further highlights the need for appropriate sampling and scaling designs that can capture these high spatiotemporal dynamics to provide representative catchment-based emission estimates.

How to cite: Aziz, K., Audet, J., Conroy, H., Geranmayeh, P., Kyllmar, K., Peacock, M., Sobek, S., and Wallin, M.: Spatiotemporal dynamics and controls of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural ditches, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-17014, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-17014, 2025.