EGU25-17612, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-17612
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 17:20–17:30 (CEST)
 
Room -2.43
Future Mining Scenarios: A Forward-Looking Exploration of the Mining Industry through 2050
Vitor Correia1, Christopher Keane2, Marko Komac1, Eberhard Falck1, Zubeyde Oysul3, and Stephan Schuele4
Vitor Correia et al.
  • 1International Raw Materials Observatory, Brussels, Belgium (vcorreia@intraw.eu)
  • 2American Geosciences Institute
  • 3Center for Critical Minerals Strategy, SAFE
  • 4Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO

Overview/Background

The global mining sector faces unprecedented challenges as it navigates intensifying geopolitical tensions, opaque markets, mounting environmental concerns, and increasingly complex social license issues. This research presents a comprehensive scenario analysis examining potential futures for the mining industry through 2050, developed through a rigorous methodology combining expert knowledge with strategic foresight methods.

 

Methods

The study employed a structured scenario technique leveraging the PESTEL framework and incorporating input from industry experts across Europe and the United States. Through workshops conducted in 2023 and 2024, researchers identified 20 main factors driving the mining industry's future. These factors were analysed using Cross-Impact Balances methodology and the ScenarioWizard Tool, initially generating nine scenarios that were subsequently consolidated into four distinct futures.

 

Results

The analysis yielded four contrasting scenarios: (1) "The Advancement Wave", characterised by technology-driven progress but widening inequality; (2) "Divided Dominions", depicting fragmented trade blocs and market distortion; (3) "Downward Spiral", showing widespread resource nationalism and environmental degradation; and (4) "The Great Transition", presenting unprecedented international cooperation following a global catastrophe. Each scenario explores interconnected dimensions including international cooperation, economic conditions, social dynamics, environmental aspects, and technological development within the mineral raw materials sector.

 

Conclusions

The research identified five fundamental differentiators determining the extractive industry’s trajectory: technological innovation adoption, societal acceptance of mining operations, stability of policy frameworks, management of demand volatility, and degree of international cooperation. The findings emphasise that while the industry's future remains malleable, success requires sustained political commitment and policy stability across electoral cycles, alongside careful balance between domestic security and international cooperation, environmental protection and economic development, and local impacts versus global benefits.

 

Policy Implications

Evidence from all scenarios demonstrates that geopolitics is the primary factor shaping the future of the mining sector. Moving towards more positive outcomes requires decisive actions: maintaining strong public support for R&D, improving societal acceptance through reformed permitting processes, creating mechanisms to minimise market cyclicity, enhancing multilateral cooperation, and developing long-term strategic planning beyond electoral cycles. These findings provide valuable insights for policy-makers in shaping resilient strategies to secure the supply of mineral raw materials.

How to cite: Correia, V., Keane, C., Komac, M., Falck, E., Oysul, Z., and Schuele, S.: Future Mining Scenarios: A Forward-Looking Exploration of the Mining Industry through 2050, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-17612, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-17612, 2025.