EGU25-20681, updated on 15 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20681
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 30 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X4, X4.104
Improving Ice Segmentation in Permafrost Cores using Computed Tomography
Mahya Roustaei1, Jan Nitzbon2, Jordan Harvey3, Evan Francis3, Steffen Schlueter2, Julia Boike2, and Duane Froese3
Mahya Roustaei et al.
  • 1Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
  • 2Alfred Wegener Institute's research centre in Potsdam, Germany
  • 3University of Alberta

The segmentation of ice in X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) scans of permafrost samples has traditionally relied on the Hounsfield Unit (HU) thresholding approach while their accuracy is often limited by overlapping density ranges in complex and heterogeneous samples. Recent advances, including automated thresholding algorithms and machine learning techniques, offer improved precision by leveraging texture, contrast, and morphological features in CT images. This study investigates the evolution of ice segmentation methodologies by applying multiple approaches to a 164 cm long permafrost core drilled from a Yedoma upland in north-eastern Siberia. The core was analyzed using traditional HU thresholding, automated thresholding methods (e.g., Otsu and adaptive histogram-based segmentation), and machine learning models (e.g., random forests and convolutional neural networks). The results from CT scans and segmentation methods were validated and compared against laboratory measurements of ice content and density, ensuring a robust evaluation of each technique's accuracy and reliability.

The results provide critical insights into the strengths, weaknesses, and suitability of different segmentation methods for permafrost cores. These findings contribute to the development of standardized, high-precision methodologies for non-destructive characterization of ice-rich soils, supporting geotechnical and climate change studies in permafrost regions.

How to cite: Roustaei, M., Nitzbon, J., Harvey, J., Francis, E., Schlueter, S., Boike, J., and Froese, D.: Improving Ice Segmentation in Permafrost Cores using Computed Tomography, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20681, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20681, 2025.