EGU25-2319, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2319
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 02 May, 15:10–15:20 (CEST)
 
Room 1.85/86
Regional and Temporal Variability of Atmospheric River Seasonality: Influences of Detection Algorithms and Moisture Transport Dynamics
Diya Kamnani1, Travis A. O'Brien1,2, Samuel Smith3, Paul W. Staten1, and Christine A. Shields4
Diya Kamnani et al.
  • 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, United States of America (dkamnani@iu.edu)
  • 2Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, United States of America
  • 3Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States of America
  • 4Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States of America

Understanding the regional and temporal variability of atmospheric river (AR) seasonality is crucial for preparedness and mitigation of extreme events. While ARs were thought to peak in winter, recent research shows they exhibit region-specific seasonality and are heavily influenced by the chosen detection algorithm. This study examines the link between the year-to-year consistency of peak AR activity to the presence of a dominant seasonal pattern, considering both location and algorithm choice. Regions are categorized by their temporal characteristics: consistent patterns (e.g., India, Central Asia), patterns with occasional outliers (e.g., British Columbia coast, Gulf of Alaska), and regions lacking a clear dominant peak season (e.g., South Atlantic, parts of Australia). Hence, not all regions display a consistent seasonal cycle of AR activity. This study quantifies the extent to which a region experiences a dominant peak season of AR activity (or lacks one) and offers insights to enhance decision-making in water management, natural hazard preparedness, and forecasting. Furthermore, given our finding that detection algorithms influence the peak season of AR activity, we also examine two diagnostic variables representative of moisture transport to corroborate our results. Integrated Vapor Transport, which captures meridional and zonal moisture transport, and Moist Wave Activity, representing moisture intrusions from lower to higher latitudes, are examined. Our analysis indicates that inconsistencies in the seasonal cycle of AR activity are not solely due to discrepancies in detection algorithms but also arise from changes in moisture transport.

How to cite: Kamnani, D., O'Brien, T. A., Smith, S., Staten, P. W., and Shields, C. A.: Regional and Temporal Variability of Atmospheric River Seasonality: Influences of Detection Algorithms and Moisture Transport Dynamics, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-2319, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2319, 2025.