EGU25-277, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-277
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 30 Apr, 11:30–11:40 (CEST)
 
Room L2
Variability of seasonnally frozen ground in an agricultural field using drone-based GPR
Lisa Michaud1, Michel Baraër1, Christophe Kinnard2, Annie Poulin1, and Mathis Goujon1
Lisa Michaud et al.
  • 1École de Technologie Supérieure (Montreal, Canada), Génie de la construction, Canada (lisa.michaud.1@ens.etsmtl.ca)
  • 2Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (Trois-Rivières, Canada), Sciences de l'environnement, Canada

Spring in cold regions is a critical time for floods, as snowmelt releases large amounts of water into watersheds. Seasonally frozen ground reduces soil infiltration and increases runoff by blocking pores in the soil. This limited infiltration causes rivers to respond faster to rain or meltwater, heightening flood risks. Most hydrological models used to project flood risks in a future climate are built on the assumption that, for a given land use, soil infiltrability is somewhat homogeneous. We challenge that assumption by measuring frozen ground thickness distribution in an agricultural field over an entire winter. For that purpose, we measured frost thickness at one specific point of the field at a sub hour frequency and over a +/- 120m transect on a weekly basis. Point measurements were done using TDR sensors.   The transect measurements were performed with a drone-based ground penetrating radar (GPR). The use of a drone based GPR allowed repetitive measurements over a given transect in a nondestructive way. Unlike a drone based GPR, the use of a ground based GPR would have altered the snow cover over the studied transect with potential perturbations of the heat exchanges at the ground surface.

Field measurements show that the ground frost depth is not spatially uniform all winter long. During the snowmelt period, the ground frost depth is particularly heterogeneous. We found that 78.11% of the transect that we were able to interpret had an unfrozen layer on top of the frozen ground. If the top layer of the ground is unfrozen during the snowmelt period, it forms a zone where there can be liquid water infiltration and/or storage. Furthermore, because of the spatial variability of ground frost, some areas thaw completely before others. The matric potential of these areas increases and allow preferential infiltration in the thawed zone while the ground is still considered frozen. We conclude that it is important to account for spatial variability of ground frost to better understand how seasonally frozen ground impacts infiltration and flooding. The study shows that drone based GPR is a well-adapted tool to evaluate frozen ground thickness variability in a repetitive and non-destructive way.

How to cite: Michaud, L., Baraër, M., Kinnard, C., Poulin, A., and Goujon, M.: Variability of seasonnally frozen ground in an agricultural field using drone-based GPR, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-277, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-277, 2025.