CR6.6 | Radar investigations of icy and rocky (sub)surfaces
Orals |
Wed, 10:45
Wed, 14:00
Radar investigations of icy and rocky (sub)surfaces
Co-organized by PS7
Convener: Anja RutishauserECSECS | Co-conveners: Rebecca Schlegel, Renée Mie Fredensborg HansenECSECS, Kirk M. ScanlanECSECS, Kristian Chan
Orals
| Wed, 30 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST)
 
Room L2
Posters on site
| Attendance Wed, 30 Apr, 14:00–15:45 (CEST) | Display Wed, 30 Apr, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5
Orals |
Wed, 10:45
Wed, 14:00

Orals: Wed, 30 Apr | Room L2

Chairpersons: Anja Rutishauser, Rebecca Schlegel, Kristian Chan
10:45–10:50
Radar Investigations of Large Ice Sheets and Glaciers
10:50–11:10
|
EGU25-4553
|
solicited
|
On-site presentation
Joseph A MacGregor, Mark A Fahnestock, Andy Aschwanden, John D Paden, Jilu Li, Jeremy P Harbeck, and Constantine Khrulev

Radar sounding across a wide range of frequencies regularly generates rich datasets for local-to-regional-scale investigation of the properties and processes that govern ice flow. However, beyond measurements of ice thickness, little of this richness is directly incorporated into continental-scale models that project the future of Earth’s ice sheets amid anthropogenic climate change. Ice sheets have long memories, and their isochronal radiostratigraphy memorializes and integrates an ice sheet’s response to past centennial-to-millennial-scale climatic and dynamic events. These memories are often cast aside in modeling studies to focus on reproducing recent observations of dramatic change, but at the expense of a more reliable initial state. Isochronal radiostratigraphy is thus an obvious target for next-generation continental-scale validation of the initial state of ice-sheet models and evaluation of their sensitivity to past climate changes. Here we describe the second version of a VHF radiostratigraphy of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 26 NASA and NSF airborne campaigns between 1993 and 2019 and its value for identifying well-tuned modern instances of the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM). We incorporated several lessons learned from the generation of the first version (1993–2013), improved quality control, reviewed and augmented the entire 1993–2013 radiostratigraphy, and applied an independently developed method for predicting radiostratigraphy (ARESELP) to the previously untraced campaigns (2014–2019) to accelerate their semi-automatic tracing. The result is a substantially more robust and accessible radiostratigraphy of the Greenland Ice Sheet that highlights the tradeoff between speed and sophistication for generating continental-scale observational constraints from radar sounding. We upgraded PISM to generate and record ice age non-diffusively, and then generated an ensemble of PISM simulations initialized during the Last Glacial Period through to the present. This ensemble is compared against our new radiostratigraphy to evaluate its basin-level sensitivity to deglaciation and to identify a best-fit simulation to use as an initial state for future projections.

How to cite: MacGregor, J. A., Fahnestock, M. A., Aschwanden, A., Paden, J. D., Li, J., Harbeck, J. P., and Khrulev, C.: An improved radiostratigraphy of the Greenland Ice Sheet and its value for ice-sheet model initialization, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-4553, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-4553, 2025.

11:10–11:20
|
EGU25-14008
|
On-site presentation
Duncan Young, Shuai Yan, Alejandra Vega González, Shivangini Singh, Megan Kerr, Duyi Li, Gregory Ng, Dillon Buhl, Scott Kempf, and Donald Blankenship
Internal reflecting horizons (IRH) seen in ice penetrating radar data are key markers of ice sheet mass balance and strain [1].  Additional units lacking horizons, but sometimes with diffuse echoes, are also seen at depth in the ice sheet. IRH are characterized by a specular radar response at VHF frequencies. Existing approaches for broadly characterizing IRH [ILCI, 2] focus on their appearance in time delay, but do not exploit azimuth information. In the along track direction, azimuth information can be extracted from delay doppler processing [3,4], and used to constrain roughness and geometric information about the subsurface [4,5,6,7].  We find that basal ice can be cleanly separated from stratigraphic on the basis of its delay doppler appearance in 60 MHz MARFA data.

Here we present an automatically generated volume of basal and stratigraphic ice for the Dome A region using NSF Center for Oldest Ice Exploration (COLDEX) radar data collected in between 2022 and 2024, based on delay doppler thresholding, and compare this to manual interpretation of COLDEX radargrams [8].  We also demonstrate the approach on selected other regions of Antarctica, and examine how as a quality estimate this delay doppler approach complements the ILCI approach.
 
1. Bingham, Bodart, Cavitte, Chung, Sanderson, Sutter et al., in review; doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-2593
2. Karlsson et al, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2012.04.034
3. Raney, 1998; doi:10.1109/36.718861
4. Peters et al., 2005; doi:10.1029/2004JB003222
5. Schroeder et al. 2014; doi:10.1109/LGRS.2014.2337878
6. Castelletti et al., 2019; doi:10.1017/jog.2019.72
7. Arenas-Pingarrón et al., 2023; doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2856
8. Young, Paden et al, 2024; doi:10.18738/T8/J38CO5

How to cite: Young, D., Yan, S., Vega González, A., Singh, S., Kerr, M., Li, D., Ng, G., Buhl, D., Kempf, S., and Blankenship, D.: Using delay doppler processing to separate stratigraphic and basal ice at Dome A, Antarctica, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-14008, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14008, 2025.

11:20–11:30
|
EGU25-7569
|
On-site presentation
Eliza Dawson, Winnie Chu, Michael Christoffersen, and Donglai Yang

Attenuation rates derived from radar data offer valuable insights into subsurface ice sheet conditions, revealing information about the ice sheet temperature, chemical composition, and physical structure. Accurate attenuation estimates are also essential for interpreting basal conditions. However, established methods for estimating attenuation rates perform poorly in certain ice sheet regions, and uncertainties remain in the physical interpretations of attenuation results.

In this study, we develop a novel frequency-based method for deriving ice sheet attenuation rates, adapting techniques from planetary radio science and seismology. We apply this method to airborne radar sounding data collected across multiple Antarctic basins, enabling new interpretations of the englacial and subglacial environment in regions where subsurface information is sparse. Not only do these frequency-based attenuation estimates offer valuable englacial and subglacial insight in new regions of the Antarctic ice sheet, but we show how leveraging the attenuation results to train neural networks can facilitate predictions and constraints on subglacial conditions. Such constraints are useful for better resolving subsurface processes in numerical models. Our study highlights the potential of advancing conventional geophysical methods in combination with AI-driven approaches and model validation to enhance our understanding of ice sheet subsurface conditions and ice dynamics.

How to cite: Dawson, E., Chu, W., Christoffersen, M., and Yang, D.: Advancing Radar Sounding Attenuation Estimates with Frequency-Based Techniques, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-7569, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7569, 2025.

Radar Studies in Other Terrestrial Snow, Ice, and Frozen Ground
11:30–11:40
|
EGU25-277
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Lisa Michaud, Michel Baraër, Christophe Kinnard, Annie Poulin, and Mathis Goujon

Spring in cold regions is a critical time for floods, as snowmelt releases large amounts of water into watersheds. Seasonally frozen ground reduces soil infiltration and increases runoff by blocking pores in the soil. This limited infiltration causes rivers to respond faster to rain or meltwater, heightening flood risks. Most hydrological models used to project flood risks in a future climate are built on the assumption that, for a given land use, soil infiltrability is somewhat homogeneous. We challenge that assumption by measuring frozen ground thickness distribution in an agricultural field over an entire winter. For that purpose, we measured frost thickness at one specific point of the field at a sub hour frequency and over a +/- 120m transect on a weekly basis. Point measurements were done using TDR sensors.   The transect measurements were performed with a drone-based ground penetrating radar (GPR). The use of a drone based GPR allowed repetitive measurements over a given transect in a nondestructive way. Unlike a drone based GPR, the use of a ground based GPR would have altered the snow cover over the studied transect with potential perturbations of the heat exchanges at the ground surface.

Field measurements show that the ground frost depth is not spatially uniform all winter long. During the snowmelt period, the ground frost depth is particularly heterogeneous. We found that 78.11% of the transect that we were able to interpret had an unfrozen layer on top of the frozen ground. If the top layer of the ground is unfrozen during the snowmelt period, it forms a zone where there can be liquid water infiltration and/or storage. Furthermore, because of the spatial variability of ground frost, some areas thaw completely before others. The matric potential of these areas increases and allow preferential infiltration in the thawed zone while the ground is still considered frozen. We conclude that it is important to account for spatial variability of ground frost to better understand how seasonally frozen ground impacts infiltration and flooding. The study shows that drone based GPR is a well-adapted tool to evaluate frozen ground thickness variability in a repetitive and non-destructive way.

How to cite: Michaud, L., Baraër, M., Kinnard, C., Poulin, A., and Goujon, M.: Variability of seasonnally frozen ground in an agricultural field using drone-based GPR, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-277, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-277, 2025.

11:40–11:50
|
EGU25-16306
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Anna Siebenbrunner, Robert Delleske, and Markus Keuschnig

Avalanche risk assessment critically depends on understanding snowpack conditions. Conventional methods, such as weather forecasts, field observations, and snow pits, provide valuable information but are limited in their ability to capture the high spatial variability often observed within the snowpack. Geophysical near-surface methods can help unveil spatial variabilities within the snowpack. This study investigates the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to characterize snowpack heterogeneity at high spatial resolution, previously unattainable using conventional methods. Our study found a high correlation (R²=0.93, r=0.97) between snow depth measurements obtained from UAV-borne GPR and conventional probe measurements, indicating a strong accuracy of the GPR method for assessing snow depth. This suggests that UAV-borne GPR can effectively and reliably measure snow depth. Data collected from multiple alpine sites in the Austrian Alps revealed pronounced spatial variability within the snowpack over short distances. The analysis unveiled considerable snow depth variability with values ranging from < 1 m to > 4 m within our largest study site (~ 0.07 km²) at Stubai Glacier, Tyrol, Austria. We furthermore observed a high degree of internal snowpack variability within short distances. These findings emphasize the importance of considering spatial variability in avalanche formation and highlight the potential of UAV-borne GPR to provide valuable insights beyond the limitations of traditional methods. The system employed in this study utilizes readily available components, making it a potentially valuable tool for both researchers and practitioners, potentially complementing conventional methods for more comprehensive snowpack analysis and avalanche mitigation. 

How to cite: Siebenbrunner, A., Delleske, R., and Keuschnig, M.: Unveiling Hidden Heterogeneity: UAV-borne GPR for Investigating Alpine Snowpack Variability, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-16306, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16306, 2025.

11:50–12:00
|
EGU25-4482
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Torbjörn Kagel and Lu Zhou

Snow on sea ice plays a critical role in modulating ice mass changes in response to anthropogenic warming, with significant implications for ocean mixed layer processes, the surface energy budget, and marine ecosystems. Most importantly, accurate snow depth measurements are essential for deriving reliable sea ice thickness estimates from all altimetry satellites. Operation IceBridge (OIB), which collected snow depth data using the airborne CReSIS FMCW C/S-band snow radar for a decade, remains a pivotal reference for understanding pan-Arctic snow depth changes and validating remote sensing snow retrievals. Despite its importance, significant concerns persist regarding snow retrieval algorithms from snow radar, particularly around algorithm performance and the representation of snow properties.

In this study, we revisit OIB snow depth retrieval algorithms by comparing them with underutilized in-situ snow depth measurements from MagnaProbe surveys conducted near Eureka, Canada, in 2016. To enhance the spatial representation of the in-situ data, we employ Kriging interpolation methods. Additionally, we make use of the co-collected conical laser scanner data. A detailed comparison of retrieval algorithms - focusing on the detection of the air-snow and snow-ice interfaces as well as the derived snow depth - reveals that the Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) algorithm performs best for the 2-8 GHz snow radar version, yielding a correlation of R=0.72 over undeformed sea ice. However, the CWT algorithm predominantly detects snow depths within the 80-90% quantile of the in-situ distribution within the radar footprint. This bias is attributed to the air-snow interface being identified as the first rise above the radar noise floor, which typically corresponds to the highest snow elevations within the footprint. Finally, we compare a subset of newly derived snow depth data from OIB  including highly-valuable uncertainties with existing datasets, highlighting potential improvements.

Looking ahead, we propose a framework to enhance snow depth retrieval algorithms, offering robust pathways for validating and improving satellite-based snow datasets. This approach holds significant promise for advancing the accuracy of snow depth measurements critical to polar science in the future campaigns.

How to cite: Kagel, T. and Zhou, L.: Revisiting NASA's Operation IceBridge Snow on Sea Ice Radar Measurements in the Arctic, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-4482, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-4482, 2025.

12:00–12:10
|
EGU25-13781
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Annie Cheng, Dustin Schroeder, Natalie Wolfenbarger, and Riley Shaper

Estimating water content in ice is critical to our understanding of subsurface conditions and processes in both terrestrial and planetary ice masses. Knowledge of ice sheet hydrology, rheology, and thermal configuration can define more accurate models for informing sea level projections. Additionally, the presence and distribution of liquid water in ice serves as an important indicator for habitability on other planetary bodies. Past attempts to quantify water content using ice-penetrating radar tools of reflectivity, attenuation, and polarimetry have not accounted for melt inclusion geometry, leading to observational uncertainties. For instance, recent discussions regarding Mars and the Devon ice cap have highlighted the non-uniqueness of highly reflecting radar signals as being indicative of large water bodies. Other radar observables such as attenuation and polarimetry – commonly attributed to englacial water and ice fabric, respectively – may be similarly non-unique. Here, we use geometric mixing models to show how a variety of geophysical conditions can be replicated by small volume fractions of geometrically oriented melt, with strong implications for water content in both temperate and sub-temperate ice as well as ice fabric orientation. We further discuss how the combination of geometric mixing models with polarimetric radar can be a valuable tool in clarifying melt volume fraction and orientation.

How to cite: Cheng, A., Schroeder, D., Wolfenbarger, N., and Shaper, R.: The effect of melt geometry in ice on radar reflectivity, attenuation, and polarimetry, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-13781, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13781, 2025.

Planetary Radar Applications
12:10–12:20
|
EGU25-14090
|
On-site presentation
Availability of LRO Mini-RF S- and X/C-band Data for Landing Site Characterization
(withdrawn)
Wes Patterson, Gareth Morgan, Angela Stickle, Tanish Himani, Caleb Fassett, Edgard Rivera-Valentín, Arnav Agrawal, Ali Bramson, Santa Lucia Pérez-Cortés, Lizeth Magaña, Bradley Thomson, Tamal Samaddar, Thomas Frueh, Cole Nypaver, and Joshua Cahill and the the Mini-RF team
12:20–12:30
|
EGU25-20315
|
On-site presentation
Bradley Thomson, Cole Nypaver, G. Wes Patterson, Angela Stickle, Thomas Fruh, and Josh Cahill

A major milestone for the commercial lunar sector was attained by Intuitive Machines’ lander Odysseus (IM-1), which successfully soft-landed near the lunar south pole on February 22, 2024. The Odysseus mission was the second launch of the NASA’s lunar CLPS (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) program and the first to successfully reach the Moon. Despite coming to rest at an unplanned angle of ~30°, the spacecraft was able to communicate with Earth and remained operational for a week on the lunar surface.

 

Here we use available orbital data to characterize the geologic context of the IM-1 landing site, with an emphasis on Mini-RF bistatic radar data, LROC image data, and LOLA and LROC topographic data. One of the science goals of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)’s extended mission is to support future lunar landings by analyzing orbital data over future, current, and past landed missions in order to better constrain and “ground truth” the orbital data. Landing site characterization is a key element in planetary surface exploration as a mission that does not land safely is over before it begins.

 

Odysseus touched down in an intercrater region about 10° latitude from the lunar south pole (~300 km) at 80.13°S, 1.44°E. The landing site lies on a ~12° slope east of the irregular, degraded Malapert A crater (33 km in diameter) and roughly equidistant between craters Malapert B, Malapert C, and Malapert K (32, 38, and 39 km in diameter, respectively). Notably, the site is very close to the ring of discontinuous massifs that constitute the outer rim of South Pole-Aitken Basin.

 

The landing site was as expected in that it is a typical highlands site that consists of mostly low, rolling terrain, formed by an accumulation of ancient ejecta and interrupted by craters; steep slopes are largely limited to crater interior walls. Odysseus landed adjacent to the rim of an ancient crater measuring about 1.2 km in diameter. No high concentrations of rough-textured ejecta or hazardous boulders that are commonly found surrounding fresh craters were observed in the Mini-RF radar data, a finding consistent with the view from the lander. Unlike on the mare, small craters in the highlands (<5 to 10 km in diameter) tend not to excavate many boulders. Therefore, the lack of a radar signature consistent with abundant rocks is in agreement with Diviner-derived rock abundance measurements for non-polar terra regions that are generally low (rocks occupy <0.5% of the surface). If Odysseus had been a sample-centric mission, those samples would likely have been regolith-dominated (unlike Apollo 16 in the highlands where there were abundant boulders).

How to cite: Thomson, B., Nypaver, C., Patterson, G. W., Stickle, A., Fruh, T., and Cahill, J.: Characterization of the Intuitive Machines (IM-1) Lunar Landing Site Near the South Pole, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-20315, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20315, 2025.

Posters on site: Wed, 30 Apr, 14:00–15:45 | Hall X5

Display time: Wed, 30 Apr, 14:00–18:00
Chairpersons: Anja Rutishauser, Rebecca Schlegel, Kristian Chan
X5.191
|
EGU25-6196
|
ECS
|
Akash Patil, Christoph Mayer, Thorsten Seehaus, and Alexander Groos

The role of firn structure and density in glacier mass balance estimation has been constrained, with studies in alpine conditions primarily limited to models. Our research focuses on understanding firn structures and firn density-depth profiles in the Aletsch Glacier's accumulation area. This is achieved through field methods, Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) as a geophysical tool, glaciological methods, and firn compaction models.

We aimed to characterize the firn structure and determine the spatial firn density-depth profiles by estimating electromagnetic wave velocities by identifying reflection hyperbolae via semblance analysis, using data collected with the common midpoint (CMP) method. Three density-depth profiles were obtained at various locations within the accumulation area, providing firn density profiles up to 35 meters deep. Firn compaction models Ligtenberg (LIG) and Kuipers Munnekee (KM), were selected from the community firn models (CFM), to evaluate how well the model results match the observations. These models were adjusted to fit the estimated 1-D firn density profiles from CMP gathered by tuning model parameter coefficients based on regional climatic conditions.

We developed a method to estimate accumulation history by chronologically identifying GPR-derived internal reflection horizons (IRHs) as annual firn layers. This method was validated against estimated snow water equivalent (SWE) from long-term stake measurements. Our findings emphasize the importance of direct measurements, such as snow cores, firn cores, and isotope samples, in identifying the previous summer horizon. We demonstrated the spatial firn density distribution and the glacier's accumulation history over the past 12 years using a 1.8 km GPR transect, supported by CMP-derived density-depth profiles. Our study underscores the potential of integrating GPR, direct measurements, and firn compaction models in monitoring firn structures and density, ultimately enhancing glacier mass balance estimation in future research.

How to cite: Patil, A., Mayer, C., Seehaus, T., and Groos, A.: Investigating firn structures in the Aletch glacier’s accumulation area using Ground Penetrating Radar , EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-6196, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-6196, 2025.

X5.192
|
EGU25-13480
|
ECS
Rodrigo Correa Rangel, Benjamin M. Jones, Andrew D. Parsekian, Andrew Mahoney, Melissa W. Jones, Todd Sformo, Brian Person, and Craig George (in Dedication)

Lake ice pressure ridges are compression ruptures that typically form due to large air temperature variations, occurring mostly on large lakes in cold environments such as the Arctic tundra and boreal regions. Quantifying pressure ridge occurrence is important for societal (e.g., natural hazards) and ecological (e.g., fish habitat) reasons. Lake ice pressure ridges can be categorized into two main types: overlapped and folded. Overlapped ridges, the more common type, occur when one side of the rupture shifts upward and overrides the other. In contrast, folded ridges develop when both sides of the rupture buckle, creating upward or downward folds. Here, we document the presence and dynamics of an annual Arctic lake ice pressure ridge in Teshekpuk Lake, Alaska, which is the largest (~830 km2) thermokarst lake in the world. We combine (1) field observations, including photos, time-lapse camera, temperature and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurements, and (2) remote sensing observations, including satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys. GPR (800 MHz) data was acquired on April 29 and May 4, 2022, along several transects perpendicular and parallel to the pressure ridge, showing its internal structure and thickness (up to ~3 m) variation. Lake ice temperature dataset, time-lapse camera images, and UAV orthoimages from late April and early May 2022 revealed that the pressure ridge activity increased as the ice surface temperatures warmed. Moreover, we compiled spaceborne SAR data between 2007 and 2025 to document the distribution of pressure ridges in 5 km grid cells over the time series, revealing that ridges occurred across most of the lake area but preferentially along the lake center and north and south margins. Finally, interferometric SAR (InSAR) data between April 19 and May 1, 2022, shows a common "split bullseye" pattern, indicating failure and buckling of the ice under compressive stress. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the formation, dynamics, and spatial distribution of lake ice pressure ridge formation in Teshekpuk Lake, offering critical insights into their ecological and societal implications in the context of a changing climate.

How to cite: Rangel, R. C., Jones, B. M., Parsekian, A. D., Mahoney, A., Jones, M. W., Sformo, T., Person, B., and George (in Dedication), C.: Annual dynamics of Arctic lake ice pressure ridge formation in Teshekpuk Lake, Alaska, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-13480, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13480, 2025.

X5.193
|
EGU25-21329
|
ECS
Investigating fabric signatures in the South Pole - Dome A sector, Antarctica
(withdrawn)
Shivangini Singh, Duncan Young, Donald Blankenship, and Benjamin Hills
X5.194
|
EGU25-12305
Carlos Martin, Robert Mulvaney, Howard Conway, Reinhard Drews, and Anja Rutishauser

The climatic conditions over ice sheets at the time of snow deposition and compaction imprint distinctive crystallographic properties to the resulting ice. As it gets buried, its macroscopic structure evolves due to vertical compression but retains traces of the climatic imprint that generate distinctive mechanical, thermal, and optical properties. Because climate alternates between glacial periods, that are colder and dustier, and interglacial periods, the ice sheets are composed from layers with alternating properties. Here we compare ice core climatic information with polarimetric radar data acquired with phase-sensitive radar (ApRES) at 5 sites on Antarctica (EPICA Dome C, Beyond EPICA – Oldest Ice, EPICA Dronning Maud Land and South Pole Ice Core) and Greenland (Camp Century). We use a new method to invert the polarimetric radar data and extract bulk crystallographic information. We conclude that there is a strong correlation in all our sites between radar anisotropic scattering and glacial to interglacial transitions. This correlation is particularly strong in the bottom half of the ice column. Our hypothesis is that this anisotropic scattering is the result of the subtle but sharp transition in crystallographic properties during glacial to interglacial transitions. To conclude, we propose to use polarimetric information to locate glacial to interglacial transitions and guide models for future ice core site exploration.  

How to cite: Martin, C., Mulvaney, R., Conway, H., Drews, R., and Rutishauser, A.: Climatic imprint in the optical properties of ice sheets: polarimetric radar as a tool for oldest ice exploration, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-12305, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12305, 2025.

X5.195
|
EGU25-10601
|
ECS
Falk M. Oraschewski, Anja Rutishauser, Reinhard Drews, Nanna B. Karlsson, Keith W. Nicholls, and Andreas P. Ahlstrøm

The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) is losing mass at accelerating rates, currently contributing ~25% to global mean sea-level rise. About half of this mass loss stems from surface melting and runoff into the ocean. In the accumulation zone, firn can buffer surface meltwater runoff, but this capacity is constrained by available pore space and presence of impermeable ice layers. As surface melting intensifies with climate warming, the future ability of firn to mitigate runoff remains uncertain, largely due to limited understanding of firn hydrological processes.

Here, we present results from autonomous phase-sensitive radio-echo sounders (ApRES) deployed at three sites in the GrIS percolation zone: KAN-U, Dye-2 and Camp Century. Installed in spring 2023, the instruments collected hourly data throughout the year, capturing the summer melt season. We analyze the ApRES time series to infer firn-meltwater interactions in the near-surface, including changes in water saturation, downward percolation of meltwater, and ice layer formation. This study demonstrates the potential of autonomous radio-echo sounding to monitor firn hydrology and provides new insights to improve predictions of firn evolution under a warming climate.

How to cite: Oraschewski, F. M., Rutishauser, A., Drews, R., Karlsson, N. B., Nicholls, K. W., and Ahlstrøm, A. P.: Unveiling firn hydrological processes in Greenland’s percolation zone with continuous radar monitoring, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-10601, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-10601, 2025.

X5.196
|
EGU25-10716
Anne Solgaard, Synne Svendsen, Nanna Karlsson, Aurélien Quiquet, Catherine Ritz, and Marion Leduc-Leballeur

A primary objective of CryoRad, a candidate mission for ESA's Earth Explorer 12, is to provide ice sheet wide satellite-derived observations of englacial temperatures and basal thermal states. These parameters are critical for modeling ice flow dynamics but remain significant unknowns for both the Greenland and the Antarctic Ice Sheets with implications for projections of future sea level rise.

In this study, we use PISM (Parallel Ice Sheet Model) and GRISLI (Grenoble ice sheet and land ice) for the Greenland Ice Sheet to evaluate the potential benefits and challenges of an observed englacial and subglacial temperature dataset for ice sheet modelling purposes. We provide PISM with synthetic englacial temperature fields mimicking the product derived from future CryoRad observations.  By perturbing the input temperature field and varying its horizontal resolution we investigate the response of the simulated ice dynamics and basal states, and assess the minimum required information level for usability in ice sheet model simulations. Furthermore, we examine the impact of uncertainties and systematic biases on modeled basal states and model drift.  Our results will help guide mission design and requirements.

How to cite: Solgaard, A., Svendsen, S., Karlsson, N., Quiquet, A., Ritz, C., and Leduc-Leballeur, M.: Assessing the usability of remotely sensed ice temperatures for ice sheet modelling, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-10716, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-10716, 2025.

X5.197
|
EGU25-5430
Daniel Farinotti, Raphael Moser, Ilaria Santin, Christophe Ogier, Huw Horgan, Faezeh M. Nick, Nanna Karlsson, Andreas Vieli, Anja Rutishauser, and Hansruedi Maurer

The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) presently loses mass at a rate of ~200 Gt/yr, impacting anything from ocean circulation and sea levels, over sea-ice extents and surface albedo, to the functioning of local ecosystems and human activities. Half of the loss is due to surface melt, while the other half stems from direct ice discharge into the ocean. The latter is essentially the product of the ice flow velocity and the ice thickness of so-called outlet glaciers, i.e. glaciers that transport ice from the GrIS’s interior to the ocean. While ice flow velocity can be determined via remote sensing, the ice thickness is much harder to constrain. This is particularly true in the southern Greenland, where ice thickness surveys have been rare and often unsuccessful in the past.

Here, we report on a pilot project by which ETH Zurich’s Airborne Ice penetrating Radar (AIRETH) was deployed over four outlet glaciers using Narsarsuaq airport, southern Greenland, as base for the operation. More specifically, we used AIRETH’s 25MHz configuration to conduct a set of dedicated, helicopter-borne GPR surveys over (i) Qooqqup Sermia, (ii) an unnamed glacier terminating into Lake Motzfeldt, (iii) Eqalorutsit Kangilliit Sermiat, and (iv) Sermilik Bræ. These sites are of specific interest in the frame of ongoing partner projects and had seen unsuccessful airborne GPR investigations in the past. Our contribution will provide details on the used GPR system and present first results, particularly focusing on both the encountered challenges and the interpretation of the retrieved data. A comparison to previously-existing, model-based ice thickness estimates will be presented too, providing hints on the need of further investigations.

How to cite: Farinotti, D., Moser, R., Santin, I., Ogier, C., Horgan, H., Nick, F. M., Karlsson, N., Vieli, A., Rutishauser, A., and Maurer, H.: Can we see through the ice of Greenland’s outlet glaciers? A helicopter-borne GPR investigation in southern Greenland, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-5430, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-5430, 2025.

X5.198
|
EGU25-18193
|
ECS
Three-dimensional full-waveform inversion of asteroid interiors from monostatic radar data
(withdrawn)
Zhiwei Xu, Fengzhu Zhang, Peimin Zhu, Yuefeng Yuan, Zi'ang Li, Shi Zheng, Ruidong Liu, and Shuanlao Li
X5.199
|
EGU25-13558
|
ECS
Enhancements to Mini-RF X/C-band Data Quality through Cross-Channel Calibration and Reprocessing Strategies
(withdrawn)
Kristian Chan, G. Wesley Patterson, J. Robert Jensen, F. Scott Turner, Nicholas T. Dutton, and the Mini-RF Team