EGU25-3744, updated on 14 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3744
EGU General Assembly 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 01 May, 09:35–09:45 (CEST)
 
Room 0.94/95
Towards an understanding of the morphology of Jupiter’s magnetic field
Jeremy Bloxham1, Hao Cao2, David Stevenson2, John Connerney4, and Scott Bolton5
Jeremy Bloxham et al.
  • 1Harvard University, Earth & Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States of America (jeremy_bloxham@harvard.edu)
  • 2UCLA, Earth, Planetary & Space Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America (hcao@epss.ucla.edu)
  • 4NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States of America (John.e.connerney@nasa.gov)
  • 5Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States of America (scott.bolton@swri.org)

As has been recognized since the completion of Juno’s first nine orbits, Jupiter’s magnetic field is morphologically distinct from that of the other planets. Six years later, with over 50 additional orbits, that picture has not fundamentally changed. While, like Earth, the field has a strong axial dipole component, the most intense field occurs in two distinct regions: the Great Blue Spot (GBS) and the Northern Hemisphere Flux Band (NHFB). Elsewhere, there are large regions of very low flux. What processes drive this field morphology?  While the axial dipole is almost certainly the result of a global dynamo (though of uncertain depth extent), these other features likely result from more localized dynamical processes. We consider various possibilities to explain the GBS, including flux expulsion, but only concentration of flux by a convergent (i.e. downwelling) flow seems plausible. For the NHFB, enhanced convection at the outer edge of the tangent cylinder to a deep stably stratified region is one possibility, though this does not explain the lack of such a feature in the southern hemisphere. Here, too, flux concentration by convergent flow is also a possibility. The regions of low flux may indicate the regions from which flux has been swept by divergent flow towards the regions of convergent flow. We will also discuss whether such processes are consistent with predominantly zonal flow in the presence of possible stable stratification.

How to cite: Bloxham, J., Cao, H., Stevenson, D., Connerney, J., and Bolton, S.: Towards an understanding of the morphology of Jupiter’s magnetic field, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-3744, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3744, 2025.