NH9.15 | Drought risk, vulnerability and impact assessment: understanding cascading and systemic effects
EDI
Drought risk, vulnerability and impact assessment: understanding cascading and systemic effects
Convener: Veit BlauhutECSECS | Co-conveners: Lucia De Stefano, Michael Hagenlocher, Marthe Wens, Gustavo Naumann
Orals
| Fri, 28 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST)
 
Room 1.34
Posters on site
| Attendance Fri, 28 Apr, 08:30–10:15 (CEST)
 
Hall X4
Orals |
Fri, 10:45
Fri, 08:30
The adverse effects of droughts are felt all over the globe, especially in recent years. Droughts often lead to direct and cascading, interconnected impacts on different systems and sectors from local to global scales. The likelihood of such impacts, understood as drought risk, is caused by the combination of drought hazards, exposure and vulnerabilities of interdependent systems. To support the identification and planning of drought risk reduction and adaptation, information is needed on the root causes, patterns and dynamics of drought risk and its related impacts of the past. Even though the effects of drought are widespread and well known, research focusing on the different drought risk dimensions still lags behind other natural hazard research. While major progress has been made regarding the analysis of sectoral or system-specific drought risks over the past years, grasping the complexity of cascading, interconnected and systemic drought risks remains a challenge. This session addresses these gaps by focussing on conceptual and methodological advancements aimed at better understanding, assessing and ultimately managing cascading, interconnected and systemic drought risks . The session aims to gather examples from around the globe at different spatial and temporal scales, discussing best practices, existing gaps and challenges and potential ways forward. In doing so, the session aims to bring together scientists and practitioners to evaluate the current state-of-the-art, foster drought risk research, further establish a community of researchers and practitioners, and shape the future of drought vulnerability and risk research.

Orals: Fri, 28 Apr | Room 1.34

10:45–10:50
10:50–11:00
|
EGU23-521
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Amit Dubey, Deepak Swami, Vivek Gupta, and Nitin Joshi

Drought, a natural disaster, possess a great threat to a nation as well as to human society by stressing the water availability, agricultural production and economy of the country. As per the studies, India is highly vulnerable to droughts, occurring once in every three years from the past three decades. India receives 70-80% of its annual mean precipitation brought by south-west summer monsoon. Monsoon failure leads to the acute deficiency of available water that ultimately causes droughts and water scarce conditions. This study is an attempt to analyse the spatio-temporal variations of meteorological drought and to investigate the effect of topographical variable (elevation) on Indian summer monsoon drought characteristics over Indus River Basin. Indian extent of Indus River basin has been considered as a case. Heterogeneity of the elevation spread over the basin makes it suitable for the study. Therefore, to serve the purpose, daily gridded precipitation and temperature data at a spatial resolution of 0.120 x 0.120 for a time period of 42 years (1979-2020) is utilized to analyse the drought characterization. Modified Mann-Kendall method and Sen’s slope estimator have been used to detect significant trends in the study region. Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) has been employed to identify the dry events on the basis of climatic water-balance. Indian summer monsoon lasts for four months (June-September), thus SPEI-4 has been computed to characterize the summer monsoon droughts. Results revealed that around 18% (5%) of the stations shows wetting (drying) trends for the monsoon time series analysis. Additionally, in relation to SPEI trends, larger area (25%) of the basin depicts increasing precipitation and decreasing Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) trends. Moreover, the study region experiences 1-10% and 1-5% severe and extreme drought frequency (percentage) respectively over the time period 1979-2020. Further, the relationship of SPEI trend with respect to elevation is explored because highlands are more vulnerable to climate change as compared to low altitude regions. In case of altitude up-to 2000 m, Sen’s slope exhibits positive magnitude thus, wetting trend is observed. A very minimalistic drying trend is seen between 2000-3000 m elevation and beyond that almost no trend pattern is followed. The possible causes of this certain behaviour of SPEI trend with elevation is determined by further analysis of trend of meteorological parameters (precipitation and PET) that were used to calculate SPEI. Both precipitation and PET trends are found to be responsible for the SPEI trends.

How to cite: Dubey, A., Swami, D., Gupta, V., and Joshi, N.: Characterization of Indian Summer Monsoon Drought and its Elevation Dependance over Indus River Basin, India, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-521, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-521, 2023.

11:00–11:10
|
EGU23-9711
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Lu Tian, Jingshui Huang, and Markus Disse

Drought is typically induced by the extreme water deficit stress that cascades through the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. However, identifying individual cascade connections remains challenging due to the nonlinear interactive loops within drought cascades initiated by numerous physical elements, which hinder the emergent patterns of droughts cascade from being explored further.

In this study, we establish a statistical framework for characterizing the dynamic space-time behaviour of droughts to track the droughts cascade. We investigate four typical droughts: precipitation (PCP), evapotranspiration (ET), Runoff, and root-zone soil moisture (SM) throughout Central Asia, the typical arid and semi-arid area of the world. Then, this method extracts 15 emergent patterns of droughts cascading corresponding to the different temporal orders. Moreover, the 15 emergent patterns of droughts cascade are categorized further as two-phase, three-phase, and four-phase drought cascading patterns in keeping with the appearance of hydrological parameters.

The result shows the highest occurrence in the four-phase cascading pattern, manifesting that the drought in PCP, ET, Runoff, and SM are expected predominantly to occur consecutively across the study area. Additionally, we find that four variations coefficients of duration, intensity, severity, and area reveal a positive linear relationship during cascading processes. Furthermore, the distribution range and magnitude of four metrics (duration, intensity, severity, and area) of PCP droughts increase with the rising of phase number in all cascading patterns.

Traits of the drought cascade provide another perspective for the drought early-warning and impact forecast in Central Asia, which could support the decision-making on drought mitigation in the arid region under exacerbated water deficit stress from global warming.

Keywords: group behaviour of droughts, cross-temporospatial scale, arid region, water management

How to cite: Tian, L., Huang, J., and Disse, M.: Emergent pattern analysis of multiple-phase droughts cascade in Central Asia from a dynamic perspective, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-9711, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9711, 2023.

11:10–11:20
|
EGU23-13020
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
David W. Walker, Juliana Lima Oliveira, Louise Cavalcante, Sarra Kchouk, Germano Ribeiro Neto, Lieke A. Melsen, Francisco Bergson P. Fernandes, Veronica Mitroi, Rubens S. Gondim, Eduardo Sávio Passos Rodrigues Martins, and Pieter R. van Oel

Drought impacts monitoring is conducted on the ground in much of Brazil by local observers at monthly and municipality scale. The monitoring was established to contribute towards the Brazilian Drought Monitor (https://monitordesecas.ana.gov.br/, established in 2014) with a multichoice questionnaire principally aimed at ground truthing the monthly map of drought condition, but with additional questions, including an open question, about drought impacts.

Our research focussed on Ceará State in drought-prone semiarid northeast Brazil. In Ceará, over 3600 questionnaires were completed by agricultural extension officers since February 2019 based on their visits to a wide area of the municipalities. These local reports about drought impacts have been under-exploited by the Drought Monitor yet represent a rich resource of impact information. We aimed to understand what drought impacts were reported and if there were differences between these local reports and the Drought Monitor maps.

We manually coded all the reports to deductively identify impacts and other useful information. Despite some spatial and temporal gaps, the data reveal: a catalogue of the most significant impacts experienced on the ground per municipality per month, impact drivers (including non-climatic drivers), and areas of greater/lesser vulnerability (i.e. where more/less impacts were reported despite matching drought condition).

Analysis shows that impacts still occur, and are often normalised during non-drought periods. The impact drivers are either non-extreme hydrometeorological conditions or socially constructed vulnerability such as a lack of water infrastructure or poverty. The normalisation of “impacts” includes, in particular: a level of crop losses that is considered usual (up to 50% losses are acceptable) and consistently low reservoir levels (around 10% of capacity) around which the agricultural and domestic systems are adapted. The frequent non-correspondence of Drought Monitor drought severity and experienced drought severity suggests the Drought Monitor, and other Drought Monitors around the world based on traditional hydroclimatic indices, are not optimal for triggering emergency response, which they are often (mis)used for, though are relevant for triggering discussion and action on drought preparation, as is usually their principal aim.

How to cite: Walker, D. W., Oliveira, J. L., Cavalcante, L., Kchouk, S., Ribeiro Neto, G., Melsen, L. A., Fernandes, F. B. P., Mitroi, V., Gondim, R. S., Martins, E. S. P. R., and van Oel, P. R.: It’s not all about drought: what “drought impacts” monitoring reveals about semiarid northeast Brazil, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13020, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13020, 2023.

11:20–11:30
|
EGU23-476
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Teun Schrieks, Wouter Botzen, Toon Haer, Oliver Wasonga, and Jeroen Aerts

The Horn of Africa Drylands are increasingly experiencing severe droughts, which imposes a thread on traditional livelihood strategies of pastoralist communities. Understanding adaptation behaviour in rural communities is essential to help reducing the impact of these droughts. In this study, we identify drivers and barriers of drought risk adaptation decisions in pastoralist communities, by analysing household survey data from 502 Kenyan households. To provide theoretically sound insights into adaptive behaviour, we have grounded our empirical research in four established economic and psychological theories on decision-making under risk: Expected Utility Theory (EUT), Rank Dependent Utility Theory (RDU), Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and Theory of Planned Behaviour (PMT). The variables of all theories are measured by multiple survey questions and we have included an economic experiment in the survey to measure the risk aversion parameters of Expected Utility Theory and Rank Dependent Utility theory. With regression models, we analyse the relation between the theory variables and adaptation behaviour. To measure adaptation behaviour, we have selected 15 different adaptation measures for which we asked about current uptake and the intention to adopt these measures in the future. Regression analyses show that important factors in adaptation decisions are risk attitudes, financial constraints, perceives self-efficacy and adaptation by family and friends.  An analysis of adaptation intention for each adaptation measure separately shows that drivers and barriers of adaptation are different for different types of adaptation measures. Risk-averse pastoralists are more likely to implement adaptation measures that are adjustments to current pastoral practices, and less likely to implement adaptation measures that require a (partial) shift to other livelihood activities. A person’s belief in their own ability to implement an adaptation measure (perceived self-efficacy) is an important factor in explaining which measure people are going to adopt. Furthermore, we find that some measures are more likely to be taken by women and others more likely to be taken by men and we find significant effects for differences in education levels. Our analysis can help to gain more knowledge on the drivers of individual adaptation decisions of pastoralists, which can enhance policies promoting adaptation of dryland communities. Our results indicate that drivers and barriers of adaptation can be quite different for different groups, which suggests that policies should be carefully targeted at specific groups.

How to cite: Schrieks, T., Botzen, W., Haer, T., Wasonga, O., and Aerts, J.: Drivers and barriers of drought risk adaptation decisions by agro-pastoralists in Kenya, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-476, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-476, 2023.

11:30–11:40
|
EGU23-13372
|
NH9.15
|
On-site presentation
Mansi Nagpal, Christian Klassert, Bernd Klauer, and Erik Gawel

In Central Europe and Germany, climate change increases the risk of temperature anomalies, heat waves, and droughts. The most profound and direct impacts of such risk will be on agriculture and food systems. Climate change will adversely impact crop yields and jeopardize harvests, resulting in substantial crop production and economic losses. The expected increase in the frequency and severity of droughts in the future due to climate change can lead to significantly higher annual economic losses. To mitigate these impacts, cultivation regimes, crop rotation, and even the entire production patterns would need to be adapted. Hence, it is imperative to understand the management of risk in crop production and its role in drought adaptation in light of predicted impacts and contribute to evidence for adaptation policies.

To achieve this objective, we develop a spatial multi-agent system (MAS) model, DroughtMAS, using an Econometric Mathematical Programming (EMP) approach. The model simulates land-use adaptation to drought conditions, estimate the damages of droughts, and assesses risk management tools and strategies. The MAS model captures the biophysical and agro-economic heterogeneity of German agriculture through individually parameterized 401 land-user agents at a sub-national scale. Cropping behavior is calibrated with land-use data from high-resolution remote sensing analyses and public records. The economic parameters ground the model in a policy-relevant context while the statistical functions capture the impacts of biophysical factors on crop production. These yield functions enable the model to respond to soil moisture changes from observed data or projections from hydrological models.

The current modeling efforts are focused on extending the model to better reflect a farmer’s cropping decision at the time of planting. Specifically, using empirical data, we estimate the farmer’s expected yield factor at the planning/planting stage expressed as a function of previous drought-year yields for major agricultural crops in Germany. The aim is to explore how the dynamic interplay between the loss of income in previous droughts and resultant farmer cropping decisions affects adaptation to droughts in agriculture.  

We present the first analysis of the extension to demonstrate the ability of the model to capture farmer cropping decisions during drought and quantify their economic impacts on agriculture in Germany. The results provide bottom-up estimates of the economic damages of droughts accounting for much-needed short-run behavioral dynamics of adaptation. This provides a versatile validated cropping simulation model that can be used for realistic projections of future drought impacts of farm-specific changes aggregated at a national scale. The model also presents a spatiotemporal pattern of these impacts, showing the potential for this model to inform targeted policy interventions. The DroughtMAS provides a platform to capture additional adaptation behaviors (e.g. drought-resilient crops, irrigation systems) and integrate with other models that require empirically validated inputs about various agricultural decision-making conditions.

How to cite: Nagpal, M., Klassert, C., Klauer, B., and Gawel, E.: Simulating economic impacts of droughts on agriculture using DroughtMAS, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13372, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13372, 2023.

11:40–11:50
|
EGU23-2168
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
|
Muhammad Sajjad

While droughts pose notable socio-economic impacts on societies, most of the related research has focused on droughts as a hazard. It is imperative to think beyond the in-practice approaches to provide more integrated tools and solutions for effective drought risk management. In connection with this, the present study introduces an integrated drought risk assessment framework to evaluate multi-dimensional high-resolution drought risk.  A Drought Risk Index (DRI) is computed at the tehsil level in Pakistan — a sub-administrative division under the district government where localized planning and decision-making take place. The DRI is based on Drought Hazard (DHI), Drought Vulnerability (DVI), and Drought Resilience (DReI) indices, which are systematically computed using a diverse range of data (i.e., the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration, soil, land-use land-cover, night-time light, population, and socio-economic variables among others). Furthermore, spatial modelling techniques (i.e., spatial autocorrelation and the Local Indicators of Spatial Association) are applied to locate and highlight statistically significant risk regions. In addition, this preliminary effort engages the state-of-the-art space-time pattern mining technique for the simultaneous spatial-temporal dynamics investigation of droughts. Pakistan exhibits a large geographical heterogeneity in terms of drought risk. Comparatively, the regions from Balochistan province are at the highest risk followed by Sindh. Notably, approximately one-third of Pakistan is identified as the hot spot with the highest drought risk (95% confidence). To an agrarian nation with ~220 million people and among the top 10 most vulnerable countries to climate change impacts, this situation ascertains grave threats under global warming. The comprehensive results from this study are expected to provide important and useful insights to prepare for drought mitigation, adaptation, and systematic impact evaluation in the face of environmental changes.

How to cite: Sajjad, M.: Towards hazard, vulnerability, and resilience-based assessment of spatial-temporal trends, patterns, and disparities in drought risk, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2168, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2168, 2023.

11:50–12:00
|
EGU23-7991
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
Virtual presentation
Davide Cotti, Anne-Sophie Sabino Siemons, Gustavo Naumann, Marthe Wens, Hans de Moel, Veit Blauhut, Kerstin Stahl, Lauro Rossi, Willem Maetens, Andrea Toreti, and Michael Hagenlocher

In recent years, research on drought risk has expanded to include multiple types of drought hazards, various exposed elements and a multitude of factors that determine the vulnerability of a given system or sector. This has resulted in a call from the scientific community to adopt a systemic risk perspective on drought. However, a thorough understanding of how drought risks manifest, cascade and interact across different systems and sectors is still lacking, and methodological guidance on how to analyse and represent these interdependencies does not yet exist.  In order to explore these gaps, we have developed conceptual models of drought risks for key selected systems and sectors in the European Union. 

For each system and sector considered (rain fed and irrigated agricultural systems, forest ecosystems, freshwater ecosystems, public water supply, inland water transport and the energy sector), a conceptual model was constructed to depict how drivers and root causes interact to create drought risk. The models are based on the impact chains methodology and are informed by literature review and multiple expert consultations (including a series of validation workshops). Subsequently, the system-specific models were used to build an overarching conceptual model of the critical interdependencies that exist between all the systems and sectors considered. 

The analysis has revealed that, in each system, drought risks manifest through a complex web of interactions between drivers of risk, which are in part system-specific and in part shared across the systems considered. From this, multiple considerations for drought risk assessment and management can be derived. In particular, special attention should be placed in defining and representing what drought risk is in each system, as the underlying characteristics might greatly differ. Additionally, the use of conceptual models can constitute an important first step for risk assessment, as they contribute to addressing the complexity of drought risks. Finally, the existence of commonalities and interdependencies between systems implies that interventions can and must be designed so as to consider multiple systems at once, thus avoiding maladaptive solutions. In this sense, the conceptual models can serve as entry points for the identification of risk reduction and adaptation measures which go beyond the single-risk and single-sector perspective, thus contributing to a more systemic view on drought risk management and adaptation, as well as highlighting persisting knowledge gaps.

How to cite: Cotti, D., Sabino Siemons, A.-S., Naumann, G., Wens, M., de Moel, H., Blauhut, V., Stahl, K., Rossi, L., Maetens, W., Toreti, A., and Hagenlocher, M.: Conceptual models of drought risks for Europe: a step towards a systemic perspective on drought, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-7991, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7991, 2023.

12:00–12:10
|
EGU23-198
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Luigi Piemontese, Stefano Terzi, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Giulio Castelli, and Elena Bresci

Climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of droughts across drylands, with negative consequences on local communities. Small water infrastructure (e.g. wells, ponds and small dams) are increasingly supported by many NGOs and national governments to increase water availability and help pastoralists cope with the effects of climate change. However, as opposed to large dams, very little is known about the potential cumulative impact of small water infrastructures and their cascading effects on the resilience of pastoral communities. Pastoralists of drylands across the world, who constitute large, marginalized groups in many low-income countries, practice mobility as one of the main adaptation strategies to water variability and uncertainty. Here we show that while developing fixed water points in dryland can provide additional water to pastoral communities, these short-term benefits can be offset by counterintuitive long-term effects such as the erosion of mobility practices and over-reliance on agriculture, thus decreasing resilience to climate change. Combining system dynamics and resilience thinking approaches, we explain the complex consequences of different water resource development strategies and their long-term cascading effects on the resilience of pastoral communities. We then show how our model can capture early signals of resilience loss in Angolan drylands, where water infrastructures are being planned at a large-scale in the pursuit of increasing climate resilience, with unclear long-term understanding of the effects of socio-hydrological dynamics on communities’ resilience.

How to cite: Piemontese, L., Terzi, S., Di Baldassarre, G., Castelli, G., and Bresci, E.: Over-reliance on water infrastructure can erode resilience of drylands pastoralists, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-198, 2023.

12:10–12:20
|
EGU23-484
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Yonca Cavus, Hafzullah Aksoy, and Kerstin Stahl

Impacts of a drought on society and hydrological processes cover a wide range of issues such as environment, economy, management and water structures. Here we present a case study addressing challenges in water management under drought conditions and human influence by focusing on developing a storyline for future reflections. With rich and fertile lands, the Seyhan River Basin in Turkey has an international importance for agricultural production as large quantities of vegetables are exported globally. The basin was exposed to an extreme drought at various intensities in the year 2008 when the river basin received the lowest precipitation ever recorded. The drought reduced total water availability throughout the river basin by triggering a series of cascading impacts such as reducing agricultural yield, increasing food prices, adversely affecting farmers’ income, leading a migration of regional farmers from rural regions toward urban centers. The migration caused population growth in big cities, alterations in water consumption habits by increasing socioeconomic development, and growth in urbanization and water-dependent sectors. These cascading impacts of the drought showed that the event indirectly fed back to affect the river basin hydrology as well. In order to avoid or minimize drought impacts, decision-makers and water managers implemented a number of water supply techniques and adopted temporary management policies, which resulted in increasing and unsustainable water demand under drought conditions. The paradoxical intervention can only mitigate negative effects of drought at short term but we need long-term drought mitigation measures. In addition, we understood that such short-term interventions should be avoided in the absence of an effective water management plan under drought conditions. An effective management plan requires that water managers, city planners, and all related governance levels interpret solutions together without challenging the entire system.

How to cite: Cavus, Y., Aksoy, H., and Stahl, K.: Human intervention against drought in Seyhan River Basin, Turkey, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-484, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-484, 2023.

12:20–12:30
|
EGU23-13476
|
NH9.15
|
On-site presentation
Jacek Stankiewicz, Ariane König, and Stefan Weiss

Since the turn of the 21st century, the capacity of many terrestrial ecosystems to withstand pressures is being eroded, with severe water stress in summer being one of the significant causes and consequences. With droughts projected to become more frequent, and to have more severe impacts, coping strategies must be in place. Some effects of droughts on human water and food systems and from ill-adapted human use of water can be mitigated through the implementation of early warning systems (EWS), which can predict the severity and duration of a drought. However, these systems should also elicit a response, delivering timely information to decision makers, including all involved in land and water management. This will allow for proactive risk management measures and appropriate emergency response programs. To comprehensively deal with such complex problems, innovative and integrated governance approaches are necessary. An approach put forward to manage complex social-environmental problems such as droughts is adaptive governance, which calls for more flexible and learning-based collaborations and decision-making processes involving all relevant actors and stakeholders across different governance levels.

Here we present the concept for an integrated drought EWS that provides prestructured accessible data and actionable knowledge across actors at different levels of governance. We propose the development of an accessible multiple-source-design web platform with a structure to cater for different user groups. The monitoring and associated EWS would allow data and scenario visualisation, along with ongoing networked and collaborative experimentation with adaptation and mitigation measures. The platform would also include an interactive blogging domain. In co-designing the EWS with stakeholders the project aims to create a sense of co-ownership to encourage active engagement, bringing together interest groups in agriculture and water to prioritize future challenges concerning resilience of ecosystems involving water, soil and agriculture.

The concept is developed based on the case of Luxembourg as a small country, but the innovative approach to co-creating knowledge for action across different scales is relevant in diverse contexts. The proposed EWS would function across scales, offering access to different spatial and temporal scales of representations of circumstances relating to drought risks, accessible to various actors across different levels of governance. For contiguous spatial representations relating to the entire territory of the nation state (and surroundings), remote sensing data from satellites would be used, such as EU and national data on land cover and land use and satellite based soil moisture. Official measurement stations and monitoring programmes on river levels and precipitation levels provide additional information at the spatial scale of individual larger rivers at the catchment level. With decreased spatial scales, municipalities or individual plots of land of farmers become the focus. The remote sensing and modelled data would need to be supplemented with ground truthing to increase the levels of accuracy, precision, and geographic scale, to reflect the real drought impacts on the ground. Citizen science can provide these data sets necessary to complement the official ones. The various levels are not intended to be discrete, but to form elements of a complete system.

How to cite: Stankiewicz, J., König, A., and Weiss, S.: Developing drought resilience through Early Warning System with knowledge for action in multi-level governance, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13476, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13476, 2023.

Posters on site: Fri, 28 Apr, 08:30–10:15 | Hall X4

X4.104
|
EGU23-5915
|
NH9.15
|
Highlight
Tobias Conradt

The 2018–2019 drought was probably the most severe in Central Europe since the first half of the 16th century. What effects were caused in North-Eastern Germany including the capital city region and the driest part of the country where sandy soils predominate? This is illustrated using both observations from the environment and data from statistical offices.

A couple of indicators – SPEI (meteorological drought), SMI (soil moisture), GGI (groundwater), SSI (streamflow), and PPI (plant physiology) – show the drought propagation from meteorology into the eco-hydrological system. Soil moisture and plant physiology showed decreasing tendencies already before 2018 when the study region was challenged by massive crop yield losses (−40% for maize compared to the 2012–2017 yield average). Forest trees suffered with delay – drought-triggered bark beetle attacks caused emergency logging and forest diebacks especially in spruce trees still in 2021.

Agriculture and forestry represent only about 1% of the regional economy (measured by gross value added), and drought effects were hardly noticeable in industry and service sectors, though. This is in remarkable contrast to the economic shocks caused by the 2008–2009 global financial crisis and the recent pandemic which left their marks in the economic time series. The question remains whether the apparent stability of the regional socio-economic system against extreme drought can still be maintained in the next decades with higher probabilities for extreme events.

How to cite: Conradt, T.: Impacts of the 2018–2019 Central European drought in North-Eastern Germany, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-5915, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-5915, 2023.

X4.105
|
EGU23-13632
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
Veit Blauhut, Ruth Stephan, and Kerstin Stahl

Drought is one of the most disastrous natural hazards in Europe, affecting a broad range of systems directly and indirectly, tangible and intangible. The complex nature of the hazard drought, its associated and cascading risks and the occurrence of compound hazards often hinder a precise assignment and quantification of drought impacts. Especially for the case of inland transportation, where different types of drought affect the strongly interconnected modes of transport, only little is known on the effects of drought. This contribution presents an analysis of the effects of drought on European inland navigation, road, and rail transport based on the European Drought Impact report Inventory 2.0 (EDII). The EDII is a standardised collection of drought impact information from a variety of sources. Impact information is classified to one of >100 drought impact types, referenced in space and time and complemented with additional reported impact information such as secondary impacts and response measures where applicable. The second public version of the EDII extends the initial database until 2021. The results show strong effects on inland navigation, in particular along major navigable European rivers. Especially cargo transport is impacted by drought, but impacts on public transport via ferries (rivers and lakes) have also been reported. For road and rail traffic, drought induced land degradation and soil shrinkage are reported as causes for damaged roads and deformation of rail tracks. Furthermore, heat waves associated with drought can lead to “melting of road surfaces” and road blow-ups, as well as track deformation and buckling. Moreover, forest and embankment fires are reported as short-term impacts on rail traffic, whereas information on secondary impacts and compound effects are generally scarce. Drought impacts on inland navigation (reduced cargo) are reported to raise market costs of goods and increase traffic on roads and rails. The results also highlight strong spatial disparity in the occurrence of drought impacts on inland transport, which either are a results of strong differences in national drought risks, reporting behaviour or information collection practice. In order to increase the resilience of transport systems to drought, a comprehensive overview on the direct and indirect impacts of the past is essential. Thus, there is a need for a common pan-European investigation of impacts on inland transportation to inform a central database.

How to cite: Blauhut, V., Stephan, R., and Stahl, K.: Impacts of drought on European inland transportation – insights from the European Drought Impact Inventory 2.0, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13632, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13632, 2023.

X4.106
|
EGU23-2122
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
Monika Bláhová, Markéta Poděbradská, Ondřej Janoušek, Anna Machátová, Filip Hlavinka, and Miroslav Trnka

Drought events are becoming one of the costliest phenomena under changing climate conditions, affecting almost every field of human activity and many ecosystems. Increasing severity and frequency of drought occurrence have led to the development of drought monitoring and predicting tools on both regional and global scales. Together with monitoring and analyzing drought risk and occurrence comes the necessity to monitor and evaluate single and multisectoral drought impacts. Aiming for early detection and a detailed description of drought impacts, we decided to design a system combining semi-automated online media scraping with a participative questionnaire accessible through Windy.com. Each week we perform an automatic search of media through automated scripts that are then read, evaluated, and sorted into impact categories and assigned geographic regions. The questionnaire allows users from around the world to describe drought impacts currently observed on the local scale. This method is unique in its combination of both regional impacts from media with direct inputs from volunteers worldwide, using a straightforward online questionnaire. The information from both sources is organized into seven impact categories (e.g., Agriculture, Wildfires, Business), and together they form an up-to-date global drought impact database that is visualized into drought impact maps. The spatiotemporal distribution of global drought impacts can then be compared with various drought indices and tools that characterize drought distribution and severity. After more than a year of active data collection in the system, we achieved a very good spatiotemporal match of reported impacts with drought events occurrence and severity (as observed by the SoilClim model). Compared to methods depending only on automated media analysis, our approach can get more detailed information from possibly underrepresented regions and create a comprehensive drought impact database.

Acknowledgement: This study was conducted with support of SustES - Adaptation strategies for sustainable ecosystem services and food security under adverse environmental conditions (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797).

How to cite: Bláhová, M., Poděbradská, M., Janoušek, O., Machátová, A., Hlavinka, F., and Trnka, M.: Global drought impact monitoring system based on online media mining and participative data collection, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2122, 2023.

X4.107
|
EGU23-2286
|
NH9.15
Emilia Karamuz, Tesfaye Senbeta, Ewa Bogdanowicz, and Jarosław Napiórkowski

The ongoing climate change disrupts the water cycle and alters the hydrometeorological patterns at global and regional scales. The alarming intensification of droughts in Europe in recent decades may become the future new norm.

This study aims to assess the future spatio-temporal drought variability in the River Vistula basin, the largest river in Poland. This basin’s vulnerability to drought is also investigated. Two drought indices, namely the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) are evaluated using the observed climatic data and meteorological projections for the 21st century. These projections of climatic variables are obtained from the EURO-CORDEX initiative based on fourteen climate models for the period 1971–2100 for the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios. Drought vulnerability analysis is carried out by combining exposure, adaptive capacity and sensitivity metrics, using the vulnerability scoping diagram (VSD) method.

Preliminary results show that projected changes in precipitation and air temperature result in significant variations in temporal drought patterns in the River Vistula basin. The divergent results were obtained for the two analysed drought indices. The SPEI projections indicate drier conditions in the basin to be expected in the far-future period, whereas the SPI indicates wetter conditions. The analysis shows that areas in the central and southern parts of the basin are more vulnerable to drought.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project HUMDROUGHT, carried out in the Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences and funded by National Science Centre (contract 2018/30/Q/ST10/00654).

How to cite: Karamuz, E., Senbeta, T., Bogdanowicz, E., and Napiórkowski, J.: Changes of drought vulnerability in the 21st century - the case study of the Vistula catchment in Poland, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2286, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2286, 2023.

X4.108
|
EGU23-6451
|
NH9.15
Ewa Bogdanowicz, Emilia Karamuz, Jarosław Napiórkowski, and Tesafaye Senbeta

Global warming and resulting climatic changes have altered the hydrological regime of Polish rivers, especially in winter season. Precipitation in the winter period may increase, but warming causes a greater share of rain in the total precipitation amounts, much shorter duration of snow cover and a disappearance of spring thaws, which are an important source of water at the beginning of the vegetation of plants. In Poland two types of low flows of different origin were observed. The summer low flows, preceded by atmospheric and soil drought, begin with a depletion of the catchment retention resources. Summer low flows are generally long-lasting, large-scale and dominant in the lowland part of the country. They often extend into the autumn period and are then called summer-autumn low flows. Winter low flows are characteristic mainly of mountain rivers, although they can also occur in lowland rivers. Their occurrence is associated with longer periods of negative air temperature. In those conditions the surface runoff is stopped, and inflows of groundwater to the riverbeds are severely limited. Ice phenomena in rivers - frazil, pans ice cover, frazil hanging dam, shore ice and anchor ice as well as ice cover and ice jam can block the flow. Winter low flows are usually short-lived and end with a thaw. Nowadays winter low flows rarely occur. Due to the changes in winter runoff processes a soil drought is frequently observed at the end of winter and the beginning of summer season which seriously threatens plants and yields. Summer or summer-autumn droughts do not change their character.

Enhancing drought resilience is a complex multidisciplinary task involving legal, organizational, technical, financial, research and methodological aspects, although the main measure to cope with drought is to increase basin retention. The use of various forms of retention allows for multifaceted effects because each method of collecting water allows for a different scope of its use. We focus here on micro- and small, soil and landscape retention with its main role to retain water in the environment and slow down its outflow from the catchment area. An equally important role of these forms of retention is to restore small water cycles when water that falls there sticks around and comes back to earth in the form of rain, dew, mist and fog.

In this study, we carry out the assessment and analysis of the amount of water that should be stored in vernal ponds to imitate to some extent the former winter runoff regime. Water deficits for the most severe summer-autumn hydrological droughts are calculated and analysed along the course of the River Vistula.

In Poland, there is no coherent policy for counteracting the effects of drought and building retention. Competences are blurred, and drought as a natural disaster is not defined in Polish legislation.

Keywords: drought resilience, climate change

Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the project HUMDROUGHT, carried out in the Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, funded by National Science Centre (contract 2018/30/Q/ST10/00654). 

 

How to cite: Bogdanowicz, E., Karamuz, E., Napiórkowski, J., and Senbeta, T.: Hydrological basis of possible water management measures for enhancing drought resilience, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-6451, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6451, 2023.

X4.109
|
EGU23-11974
|
NH9.15
|
ECS
|
Elin Stenfors, Malgorzata Blicharska, Thomas Grabs, and Claudia Teutschbein

In a changing climate, drought risk and vulnerability assessments are becoming increasingly important. Following the global call for proactive drought risk management, drought vulnerability assessments are progressively taking its stage in the drought research community. As the manifestation of drought vulnerability is dependent on the social, ecological and hydroclimatic context in which it occurs, identifying vulnerability factors relevant for specific climatological and ecological regions may improve the quality of vulnerability assessments. Meanwhile, a holistic overview of factors affecting vulnerability in polar and cold climates is currently lacking, although recent events (such as the 2018 European drought affecting large parts of Scandinavia) have reminded us that droughts are a prevalent risk even in colder climate zones. These regions are home to large socio-hydrological systems including urban areas, energy systems, agricultural practices, and the boreal forest. By conducting an interdisciplinary systematic literature review, the manifestation and conceptualization of drought vulnerability was identified for forested ecoregions in the Köppen-Geiger D and E climates. Vulnerability factors, as described by several scientific disciplines, were identified and combined into a conceptual framework for drought vulnerability in the study region. The results demonstrate the wide range of conceptualizations that exist for assessing drought vulnerability, the key sectors studied in the region, as well as the thematic differences between sectors such as forestry, water supply and agriculture. The developed conceptual framework adopts a novel approach, categorising vulnerability factors by their location in a socio-hydrological system, and their relation to blue or green water sources. This allows for identification of systemic vulnerability patterns for different drought types as well as vulnerability factors that may be universal for these socio-hydrological systems independent of the drought type they are exposed to. The results provide new insights into regional differences in drought vulnerability and a base for stakeholders performing proactive drought risk assessments in the study region.

How to cite: Stenfors, E., Blicharska, M., Grabs, T., and Teutschbein, C.: Incorporating socio-hydrological contexts for systemic drought vulnerability in forested cold climates - a conceptual framework., EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-11974, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11974, 2023.