S-wave reflection seismic imaging has emerged as a fundamental tool in near-surface geophysical investigations due to its superior resolution and increased sensitivity to lithological and geotechnical properties, compared to P-wave methods. These advantages make it particularly effective for resolving detailed subsurface structures, which are crucial for applied investigations in fields such as neotectonics and subrosion/karst, where accurate delineation of structural and stratigraphic features is essential. However, near-surface S-wave data acquisition and processing face numerous challenges, including complex wave-propagation, strong velocity contrasts, scattering, and noise contamination. These issues are further compounded by unconsolidated sediments, complex layering, and deformation features.
Advanced processing techniques are essential to overcome these obstacles, but when dealing with reflection seismic S-wave data, very often a simple, general processing sequence, e.g. involving classical NMO-correction, CMP stacking and post-stack FD time migration is applied, as described in, e.g., Krawczyk et al. (2012)1, Pugin et al. (2013)2 and Wadas et al. (2016)3. In the case of good data quality and a simple geology, these workflows might yield sufficient results, but in the case of poor data quality, in combination with a complex geological setting, more sophisticated processing sequences, such as DMO-correction, specialized filters, CRS analysis, pre-stack time/depth migration, and even full-waveform inversion, are required.
This study presents reflection seismic S-wave data from various locations in Germany that deal with different complex geological issues, i.e., neotectonics and subrosion/karst. The data were acquired using LIAG's electrodynamic micro-vibrator ELVIS (with a source spacing of 2 m or 4 m and a sweep frequency range of 20 Hz to 160/200 Hz) and a landstreamer equipped with horizontal geophones (receiver spacing of 1 m) in a roll-along configuration. Data quality varied significantly due to factors such as environmental noise, surface waves, scattering, and attenuation.
A comparison of results from conventional and advanced processing approaches of the S-wave data demonstrates the value of sophisticated imaging techniques in enhancing S-wave imaging for near-surface applications, and thus the structural and physical characterization of the underground.
1 doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.02.003
2 doi:10.3997/1365-2397.2013005
3 doi:10.5194/se-7-1491-2016